have you noticed this fact?

Rednecks have the best phrases... My old roommate's brother came out from North Georgia for a couple weeks and that was a RIOT.

My favorite is, "I'm fuckin this chicken, you just hold the wings." (Layman: I know what I'm doing, stop instructing me.)
 
Rednecks have the best phrases... My old roommate's brother came out from North Georgia for a couple weeks and that was a RIOT.

My favorite is, "I'm fuckin this chicken, you just hold the wings." (Layman: I know what I'm doing, stop instructing me.)
I told someone here, a long time ago, to "Go piss up a rope" and there was this discussion on what that meant lol (in case you don't know, it is the polite way to tell someone to go fuck themselves.)
 
As far as women on this forum, there are two kinds: newbs and grinders.

If you are a newb, being a female is to your advantage because people will give you stuff and help you out. Male newbs are told to use the search button and insulted where female newbs are helped ad nauseum. small-town-boy was right that there are advantages to being female here, he just miscategorized me as someone needing the help of a BHW man for some reason..
There is a current thread here that is a perfect example of this :


http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/blackhat-lounge/391723-im-new-need-help.html
 
I almost gave you thanks for your post until I read this. You fall in to the same category as men that think less of women. You're only doing it from a woman's POV.

Au contraire, I clearly said SOME men. I always have and always will think less of men who believe they are superior to women simply because they have a penis.

Keep your thanks, until I earn them.
 
Last edited:
Here, I fixed it for you.


251b8c3c6e.jpg
 
Au contraire, I clearly said SOME men. I always have and always will think less of men who believe they are superior to women simply because they have a penis.
Fair enough. I would agree with that. However, do you feel the same way towards women that feel they should get special or preferential treatment because they rock a tight vagina and rotund perky boobies?
 
Cool argument dude. Where do your facts come from? Mine come from evolutionary biology. You apparently resort to ad hominems. Great discussion tactic, from the thanks I can see ass kissers agree with you there.


Actually I took fun4uoc's assessment of you as fairly objective and very accurate. If you want to discuss evolutionary biology, perhaps you would like to enlighten us what made you grow up with your head in your ass, to make statements like the following:

"As the guy your worth is made up from your status, money, looks, style, etc...Woman's worth is made up of her looks. PERIOD!

The only women who really succeed at businesses are most of the time ugly ones who once at life have realized that no man will pay their bills."

Was it nature, or nurture, or perhaps both?

Or perhaps it would be better for ya to quit while you're ahead, unless you're trying to break the board record for neg rep (you're getting close).
 
(I've worked with a number so I'm going off what I understand from them).

Man do you have an advantage... LOL

With that, women are probably more likely to succeed because they are not going to jump at the next shiny linkbuilding/site building/traffic program that comes along.

OP you are also an idiot, there may well be more men owning or creating the tops sites but how do you know that they were not bankrolled by women investors. Was it not just this last year that a woman came up with a site that sold for billions and was a new site comparatively?
 
For shits and giggles just checked:

FoP4q


Pretty good, #5 in neg rep. Abit to go before you will be #1 though, cabren is at -30.

(I'm assuming concentustech's rep is a glitch, pretty sure it's impossible to have Reputation: -49967656)
 
Or perhaps it would be better for ya to quit while you're ahead, unless you're trying to break the board record for neg rep (you're getting close).
Sure. Imaginary numbers on a forum mean a lot to me. I'd want to have the most negs possible. Please go ahead.
 
Sure. Imaginary numbers on a forum mean a lot to me. I'd want to have the most negs possible. Please go ahead.

Let us know how that imaginary number works out for ya next time you try to do business on here, bud.
 
Wow. Just wow.

I guess it was only a matter of time before a thread like this surfaced, considering the number of guys on here who make sexist remarks and start flirting as soon as they see a post from someone they think is a woman (I say that because I believe that half the usernames which appear "girly" are actually set up by blokes thinking they'll get more help - as LBrown said, most women who are genuinely interested in IM tend not to advertise their gender)

I don't think it's right, but it's a statistical fact that certain industries are still extremely male orientated, Nascar was an example which someone brought up in one of the posts in this thread, and I guess IM, and possibly business in general, lean significantly towards males as well.

However, I don't think they're as one sided as some people seem to think (business and IM, not Nascar), I would say it's probably about a 70-30 split or maybe 65-35 (no evidence to back that up, just a general opinion). This is a huge shift from say 50 years ago, and an even bigger shift from 100 years ago, when the split of businessmen to businesswomen was probably more like 95-5, in many cultures it was almost frowned upon for a woman to run a business, and in most cultures the business would have lost integrity if a woman was in charge. Fortunately, times have changed and so have people's opinions (most of us at least).

To the guy who said it was all down to evolution - what kind of evolution could possibly make a man better at IM than a woman? If anything, women tend to be more organised and better at planning for the future than men (I did say "tend to", I'm not saying that's the same with all women/men), and since equal opportunities acts etc came in and education was made equal for both genders, women learn exactly the same stuff as men.

There are certain jobs where evolution does play a part in the gender divide - unless there's a significant shift in the evolutionary pattern, men will always be naturally better equiped to play physical sports such as boxing, rugby and American Football. That's the only area I can think of where evolution plays a part.

And before you say it, I am not one of the "white knight manginas", I only posted this because mindsets like yours are what sets the human race back 100 years.
 
Last edited:
Wow, you're the biggest fucking idiot I've seen on here in a long time.

And that's really saying something.

You see, there's a big problem with your argument.

Studies show that during the human evolution, the female gender, in almost every phase
of the evolution has very different abilities, obligations and place in society from men.

Men were obligated to hunt and bring food, build homes, tools and boats.
Fight and protect the family. Men has always been the head of the family and bring all the decisions, except in matriarchal period.
Men were obligated to think where to move, where to establish a village, where they will find all the resources, animals, food.

Women were obligated to take care of the children and raze them properly to be brave warriors and hunters.
Women had to make clothes and wash them, cook food, or collect natural resources found close to the caves or villages in different ages of evolution.

From a physical aspect, men have a much more developed body and muscular structure than women.
Man carry more genes about leadership and establishment than women.
But women are smart as equally as men.
Some studies show that women are smarter, more organised and careful, they are the piece keepers of mens wild spirit.

The new age of evolution brings new types of women. Strong characteristics.
Intelligent with leadership abilities. Self sustaining and know how to care for them self.

But the thing is, men have always been explorers, they always wanted to find something new.
Even from the earliest ages, men explored land, sea and sky because of curiosity, progress, adrenaline.
Men discovered ships, islands, land, discovered ways to transport, how to fly, industrial age...

Women don't carry such genes. They don't wanna take risks, they wanna walk smooth and steady towards any kind of development.
They are not as curious as men in discovering new elements in the world.
They want to enjoy life peacefully, settle down, have a family and raze children.
This has been going for thousands of years during evolution.

The guy had a point with his post. We don't know what the future beholds but so far this has been going on.
Calling him an idiot without any arguments against is so disappointing. :(
You should read more in order to be able to bring more arguments next time.
 
@spasovski, you seem like a decently reasonable guy, do you really want to be defending small_town_boy? I will chalk it up to you not reading through everything he was saying, things like:

Men give everything to women, so they do not feel the need to work.

As the guy your worth is made up from your status, money, looks, style, etc...Woman's worth is made up of her looks. PERIOD!

The only women who really succeed at businesses are most of the time ugly ones who once at life have realized that no man will pay their bills.

I hope you're not subscribing to that thinking as well (if you are, I retract my comment about you being reasonable).
 
@spasovski, you seem like a decently reasonable guy, do you really want to be defending small_town_boy? I will chalk it up to you not reading through everything he was saying, things like:



I hope you're not subscribing to that thinking as well (if you are, I retract my comment about you being reasonable).

Ups, I didn't read that.

But, I'm not defending him. I read his first post and it had a point, I don't know why someone called him an idiot because of that.

I don't approve his other opinions though.
I believe that women's success has nothing to do with looks.
It has everything to do with personality.

He is probably placing such opinions because of the "gold diggers".
 
Why are females not success and money driven you ask?

Simple.

They haven't evolved to be thinkers, workers and hustlers.


Oh. My. Fucking. God.

Did you actually just say say women haven't evolved to think? *facepalm*

It's just beyond words. If I were a women I would reach through my monitor and strangle you for that cheeky, sexist, unsubstantiated comment.

Please, show me some authoritative sites that say women haven't evolved to think?

They haven't evolved to be workers? What? What do you think women did 1000's of years ago? Sat about meditating?

Hustlers? wtf? You're saying ANY of us have evolved to become hustlers? Seriously, I think you're retarded. I saw earlier you were boasting about being an expert in evolutionary biology, yet you make a comment about evolving to be a hustler, when it takes at least 100's of thousands of years to evolve, generally millions of years.

You think you're some sort of special creature that's evolved to hustle? I think the only thing you've evolved to do is to alienate yourself from other humans.
 
Hell, less than a week ago, someone called me a "scary ugly fat slut bitch" on my youtube channel.

Aw, that's really lame. I fucking hate guys that just pull out the "slut" card to any girl that won't do what they want.

You seem like a really laid back, hard working sweetheart to me.
 
Back
Top