This Pervert MUST Be Found!

[rakoom2002]

I dont get how the hell some of you people are defending this creepo. There is nothing nurturing or fatherly about this guy. He is taking advantage of these girl's innocence while their mothers sit there doing nothing.
He tricks them into giving them him a kiss. "oooh you have green eyes there, let me look closer" kiss, on the lips. The girls are obviously extremely comfortable with what is going on. "You can win the show if I have a kiss" that?s extremely manipulative and disgusting behavior. I think it?s odd enough when family kisses on the lips let alone some fucking 50 year old man kissing these young girls.

How does the era even come close to justifying this creepy fucks actions? Just because certain inappropriate behavior didn?t have as much exposure as they do now DOES NOT justify the actions. Pedophiles are pedophiles no matter what era they lived in.

 

[Kickflip]

The way this guy is continually trying to sneak kisses when these little girls obviously don?t want him too and continually trying to make these girls feel sexually threatened by invading there personal space and asking them odd questions related to dating and adult relationships isn?t right.

The YouTube clip condenses 4 years of footage and 400+ episodes into just a few minutes. It wasn't like he was kissing every girl on ever episode. The YouTube video is TRYING to make him look bad, because they want lots of views for posting something controversial. He didn't write all of the questions I am sure, he is simply a host, a personality.

Haven't you guys ever seen videos of people chasing little girls with snakes? It's trying to get their reaction for a laugh. This is a VERY common thing for people to do! Should we compare a person who literally tortures little kids, to a guy who chases a girl with a snake when she doesn't like snakes? Is that the same thing at all?

 

[rakoom2002]

So I just want to make it clear: If you kissed a little girl in a joking manner, you wouldn't get turned on, right? So why exactly do you believe THIS particular guy is getting turned on? What evidence are you using to come to that conclusion?

If I were on a Game Show today, and I had a 10 year old daughter, and Brad Pitt or Alex Trebek was the host, and the game show asked if I would approve of them giving a quick kiss to my daughter as a laugh, I honestly wouldn't have a problem with it because I trust that Brad Pitt and Alex Trebek aren't getting aroused by it.

I don't know this host personally, but I give him the benefit of the doubt because I believe that the hundreds of people involved in producing the show knew him better then I do.

When I was younger, I got MUCH more creeped out from relatives trying to kiss me on the lips or even the cheek, then I would if a stranger did it, such as a babysitter or something.

Lol, your logic is ridiculous. So you trust brad pitt and alex trebek because they are celebrities and completely exempt from criminal thoughs or actions?



There is a huge epidemic of pedophilia amongst the child star community exactly because of this thought process. ?Well, they?re famous, they wont do anything wrong?.


There might not have been an issue if the host sneaked in one kiss on the cheek as a light hearted joke. But to repeatedly pressure these girls and put them in the extremely uncomfortable situations is despicable.

 

[James2]

Me thinks Kickflip doth protest too much.

 

[Kickflip]

@Kickflip:
Will you will send your daughter to this show once they decide to re-run with a new host?

YES! I already answered that. If I don't see any reason to think the host is being turned on by it, then I don't see a problem. I would want to meet the host before hand and speak with them, but I don't see the problem. Would you think its wrong if it was a very attractive woman kissing a 10 year old and the audience giggling?

There is nothing nurturing or fatherly about this guy. He is taking advantage of these girl's innocence while their mothers sit there doing nothing.
He tricks them into giving them him a kiss. "oooh you have green eyes there, let me look closer" kiss, on the lips. The girls are obviously extremely comfortable with what is going on. "You can win the show if I have a kiss" that?s extremely manipulative and disgusting behavior. I think it?s odd enough when family kisses on the lips let alone some fucking 50 year old man kissing these young girls.

Pedophiles are pedophiles no matter what era they lived in.

Why even mention pedophilia in this thread? There is nothing here to suggest he is getting turned on by kissing the girls! Whether you agree with his actions or not, you have to admit there is NO evidence which suggests he is actually a pedo. Any thoughts of pedophilia are in your OWN minds.

The man is actually a father himself, with a daughter who is involved in Television herself.

He is quite obviously joking about letting them win the show in exchange for a kiss, just trying to get the kids to give a funny or cute response for the audience to react to. He doesn't expect the kids to give him permission for a kiss, he actually WANTS to be rejected, because it is a much better response for television.

 

[rakoom2002]

The YouTube clip condenses 4 years of footage and 400+ episodes into just a few minutes. It wasn't like he was kissing every girl on ever episode. The YouTube video is TRYING to make him look bad, because they want lots of views for posting something controversial. He didn't write all of the questions I am sure, he is simply a host, a personality.

Haven't you guys ever seen videos of people chasing little girls with snakes? It's trying to get their reaction for a laugh. This is a VERY common thing for people to do! Should we compare a person who literally tortures little kids, to a guy who chases a girl with a snake when she doesn't like snakes? Is that the same thing at all?

Chasing girls with snakes doesn't have a sexual connotation unless you're referring to an innuendo. So your point is invalid.

 

[Kickflip]

There is a huge epidemic of pedophilia amongst the child star community exactly because of this thought process. ?Well, they?re famous, they wont do anything wrong?.

There might not have been an issue if the host sneaked in one kiss on the cheek as a light hearted joke. But to repeatedly pressure these girls and put them in the extremely uncomfortable situations is despicable.

Could you please enlighten me as to evidence f this epidemic of pedophilia amongst the child star community? Would love to hear more about this.

The entire point was to put the kids in uncomfortable situations. That is the point of the show. The audience gets entertainment out of seeing the kids in these situations and giving responses that are completely unexpected.

 

[Kickflip]

Chasing girls with snakes doesn't have a sexual connotation unless you're referring to an innuendo. So your point is invalid.

So physical and mental torture is acceptable to you, but sexual behavior is unacceptable?

 

[rakoom2002]

Could you please enlighten me as to evidence f this epidemic of pedophilia amongst the child star community? Would love to hear more about this.

The entire point was to put the kids in uncomfortable situations. That is the point of the show. The audience gets entertainment out of seeing the kids in these situations and giving responses that are completely unexpected.

Sure. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=hollywood+pedophilia+epidemic

You're not going to win your argument. More importantly I don't get why you feel strongly about this defending this guy...

 

[rakoom2002]

So physical and mental torture is acceptable to you, but sexual behavior is unacceptable?

lol, getting off topic huh. I never said it was, did I. Your comparison is invalid, doesn't make sense.

 

[Brainstorming]

The YouTube clip condenses 4 years of footage and 400+ episodes into just a few minutes. It wasn't like he was kissing every girl on ever episode. The YouTube video is TRYING to make him look bad, because they want lots of views for posting something controversial. He didn't write all of the questions I am sure, he is simply a host, a personality.

Haven't you guys ever seen videos of people chasing little girls with snakes? It's trying to get their reaction for a laugh. This is a VERY common thing for people to do! Should we compare a person who literally tortures little kids, to a guy who chases a girl with a snake when she doesn't like snakes? Is that the same thing at all?

What are you talking about!?!?!?! The guy chasing little girls with snakes is probably sick in the head too! I don't understand how you are defending this guy. I'm sure there was a lot more stuff than was just in this video. Even if he just did this once, it would be terrible, let alone us seeing him do it multiple times and I'm sure there were more that the uploader just didn't find/put on this video.

Whenever I see you in threads like this, half the time I agree with you, the other half I feel like you're just here to argue with people. I don't understand how anyone in their right mind could defend this guys actions.

 

[virtual.indiano]

Yes I would feel wrong even if it was a girl kissing a small boy. Also I think you were sleeping all these years when Michael Jackson was on trail.

According to your theory he was Rich and Famous and all what he was doing was taking kids to Neverland.

Ps: I am sure you are the perfect audience for such kind of a show. No wonder it ran for fucking 4 years.

 

[Kickflip]

lol, getting off topic huh. I never said it was, did I. Your comparison is invalid, doesn't make sense.

The guy chasing little girls with snakes is probably sick in the head too!

So would you guys make the comparison between someone who chases a girl with a snake, when she clearly is terrified of snakes, and someone who physically and mentally tortures people? Do you guys feel that is a fair comparison? Because I can tell you this is a VERY common practice. Search youtube and you can find tons of videos involving snakes and spiders etc.

Don't avoid the question, just answer it.

What makes THIS guy a pedophile pervert for kissing girls?

Also, answer this question: If you saw Brad Pitt playing a father of a 10 year old girl in a movie, and he kissed the girl on the lips, would you think he is a pedophile who should be hanged?

 

[James2]

"Also, answer this question: If you saw Brad Pitt playing a father of a 10 year old girl in a movie, and he kissed the girl on the lips, would you think he is a pedophile who should be hanged?"


Yes.

 

[rakoom2002]

 

[Brainstorming]

So would you guys make the comparison between someone who chases a girl with a snake, when she clearly is terrified of snakes, and someone who physically and mentally tortures people? Do you guys feel that is a fair comparison? Because I can tell you this is a VERY common practice. Search youtube and you can find tons of videos involving snakes and spiders etc.

Don't avoid the question, just answer it.

What makes THIS guy a pedophile pervert for kissing girls?

Also, answer this question: If you saw Brad Pitt playing a father of a 10 year old girl in a movie, and he kissed the girl on the lips, would you think he is a pedophile who should be hanged?

How can you compare someone scaring a little girl with a snake, to some random guy kissing a little girl on the lips? Either way, the guy scaring the little girl with the snake is probably sick in the head also.

NO ONE IS SAYING THIS MAKES HIM A PEDOPHILE! We are saying this guy is a pervert. He's clearly a pervert as everyone but you can see in this video. If you condone the activities in this video, then that is sad.

Now let me ask you one question (YES/NO): If you were approached to be the host on this talk show and the producers told you to be in the little girls faces, asking inappropriate questions and to kiss and attempt to kiss little girls, would you?

NOTE: Even though there are no facts that say the producers actually asked him to do this and I highly doubt they would.

Why do you keep using Brad Pitt as an example? Because he is famous and good looking? Lets say John Doe is in a movie and kissed a little girl on the lips. That would mean that the actor had consent from the little girls parents and that it was relevant to the story being told in the movie. A talk show host kissing a random little girl is in no way a comparison to something being portrayed in a movie where the little girl would be being paid to ACT and the actor kissing her, having consent from the parents.

 

[Kickflip]

Yes I would feel wrong even if it was a girl kissing a small boy. Also I think you were sleeping all these years when Michael Jackson was on trail.

According to your theory he was Rich and Famous and all what he was doing was taking kids to Neverland.

Ps: I am sure you are the perfect audience for such kind of a show. No wonder it ran for fucking 4 years.

I watched the entire Michael Jackson trial, and I think he is still very misunderstood. I think he was not mentally developed to be an adult due to his messed up childhood and he was very confused about his identity and never felt like he really belonged in the adult world.

Michael Jackson is loved and missed by MILLIONS of people. There is NOTHING socially wrong with liking and supporting Michael Jackson. We will never know what truly happened in Michael Jacksons house, but I tend to believe it was a lot of bed sharing/hugging/wrestling and nothing explicitly sexual.

Adults shouldn't need to be afraid of spending time with children.

Haven't you guys ever babysat someone elses child? What would you say if someone walked in on you blowing on a childs belly and thought you were molesting them? There is absolutely nothing you can do to defend yourself against that, because society will always think the worst of you. Do you think it would be fair to be charged as a pedophile in that situation?

 

[Kickflip]

It was sexual because it involved Kissing. and it definitely was unwanted. Even if it had not been unwanted these girls are too young to understand sexual advances from a creepy old man.

If it were a movie both parties would know about the kiss prior to filming and would have the chance to think about it and agree to it. It wouldnt be forced upon the little girl.

If Brad Pitt were to accept a role in a movie that required a scene where he was kissing a younger girl, it would be a small part of something bigger. Its not the same as a host seeking out opportunities repeatedly to kiss these girls.

So any kissing is sexual? So the guy who was kissing his own daughters on the first page was being sexual with them? I think you will find most people in this thread agree that there is sexual AND not sexual kissing. Many cultures greet each other, men and women alike, with a kiss or two, on the lips as well.

You are ASSUMING that there was no knowledge or permission given by the parents and girls before hand. You have NO idea what they discussed off camera. You are basing EVERYTHING on a few minutes of YouTube clips. What if the man discussed it with the parents and kids before hand, and they TOLD the girls to act like they did and reject him?

He wasn't just seeking out opportunities to kiss little girls. He was seeking opportunities to create entertainment for the audience. Simple as that.

How can you compare someone scaring a little girl with a snake, to some guy kissing a little girl on the lips? Either way, the guy scaring the little girl with the snake is probably sick in the head.

Why do you keep using Brad Pitt as an example? Because he is famous and good looking? Lets say John Doe is in a movie and kissed a little girl on the lips. That would mean that the actor had consent from the little girls parents and that it was relevant to the story being told in the movie. A talk show host kissing a random little girl is in no way a comparison to something being portrayed in a movie where the little girl would be being paid to ACT and the actor kissing her, having consent from the parents.

I compare them because they are the same type of thing. Again, just because some chases a girl with a snake doesn't mean he is sick in the head. He is fully in control of the situation and himself. He isn't necessarily doing it for his own sick satisfaction, but for the entertainment of others watching. He knows that the girl wont be harmed long term, and will get over it very quickly.

The talk show host isn't kissing random little girls. He is doing his job, and teasing the contestants of a gameshow to get a rise out of them. If the parents weren't comfortable with what happened, there would have been MUCH more outrage during the time that this show aired.

I would kiss a guy in a movie, doesn't mean I am gay.

 

[Brainstorming]

I watched the entire Michael Jackson trial, and I think he is still very misunderstood. I think he was not mentally developed to be an adult due to his messed up childhood and he was very confused about his identity and never felt like he really belonged in the adult world.

Michael Jackson is loved and missed by MILLIONS of people. There is NOTHING socially wrong with liking and supporting Michael Jackson. We will never know what truly happened in Michael Jacksons house, but I tend to believe it was a lot of bed sharing/hugging/wrestling and nothing explicitly sexual.

Adults shouldn't need to be afraid of spending time with children.

Haven't you guys ever babysat someone elses child? What would you say if someone walked in on you blowing on a childs belly and thought you were molesting them? There is absolutely nothing you can do to defend yourself against that, because society will always think the worst of you. Do you think it would be fair to be charged as a pedophile in that situation?

You can't defend yourself? You can't take that to court where I'm 99.99% sure that playing around blowing on a kids belly would be thrown out in court, that is if someone would ever even think that was child molestation, which who would? Comparing that to Michael Jackson sleeping in bed with children who were not his is completely different. Your comparisons are absolutely horrendous.

You go from doing comparisons about what if someone was blowing on a child's belly and the parents said it was child molestation to defending a guy who is kissing random little girls on the lips. I just don't understand....

 

[rakoom2002]

So any kissing is sexual? So the guy who was kissing his own daughters on the first page was being sexual with them? I think you will find most people in this thread agree that there is sexual AND not sexual kissing. Many cultures greet each other, men and women alike, with a kiss or two, on the lips as well.

You are ASSUMING that there was no knowledge or permission given by the parents and girls before hand. You have NO idea what they discussed off camera. You are basing EVERYTHING on a few minutes of YouTube clips. What if the man discussed it with the parents and kids before hand, and they TOLD the girls to act like they did and reject him?

He wasn't just seeking out opportunities to kiss little girls. He was seeking opportunities to create entertainment for the audience. Simple as that.



I compare them because they are the same type of thing. Again, just because some chases a girl with a snake doesn't mean he is sick in the head. He is fully in control of the situation and himself. He isn't necessarily doing it for his own sick satisfaction, but for the entertainment of others watching. He knows that the girl wont be harmed long term, and will get over it very quickly.

The talk show host isn't kissing random little girls. He is doing his job, and teasing the contestants of a gameshow to get a rise out of them. If the parents weren't comfortable with what happened, there would have been MUCH more outrage during the time that this show aired.

I would kiss a guy in a movie, doesn't mean I am gay.

*Face Palm* Your points = Fail.

I'm done, I've said enough.

There's obviously no convincing you what this guy did was wrong. And you're not going to convince EVERY OTHER person on BHW what he did was appropriate.