Any reviews for high pr society?

[davids355]

So far so good. I signed up few days ago, had a couple of issues to begin with but their support system is super quick!

I have scheduled 20 articles and also setup about 10-15 links with various pr.

I will post any movements in the next few weeks

 

[DamageX]

OK, my review.

Good diversity, good average PR.

EXPENSIVE though. With UAW I can submit pretty much unlimited number of articles per day, for a fixed cost per month. The articles get published on 400+ sites each time, at no additional cost.

With highprsociety, you get charged for every blog on which your article gets published. So say I want to publish 2 articles a day, to be listed on 400 sites each. This would add up to 3 credits/article x 2 articles x 400 (blogs) = 2400 credits. At $0.025/credit, 2400 credits would run you $60. PER DAY.

Sorry, I'll be cancelling and going back to UAW. Had good results with it and I see no reason to overpay so grossly, for basically the same service.

 

[Ranko Jones]

Thanks for bringing this to my attention

 

[dunk15us]

I have a question for existing customers. How is the article quality control on the network? One of the biggest reasons people pay more for BMR and not networks like UAW or seolinkvine is because of the quality of the articles and hence the overall network. Does high pr society let just about any crappy 30% unique spun onto the network? If this is the case then the cost is not justified IMO.

OK, my review.

Good diversity, good average PR.

EXPENSIVE though. With UAW I can submit pretty much unlimited number of articles per day, for a fixed cost per month. The articles get published on 400+ sites each time, at no additional cost.

With highprsociety, you get charged for every blog on which your article gets published. So say I want to publish 2 articles a day, to be listed on 400 sites each. This would add up to 3 credits/article x 2 articles x 400 (blogs) = 2400 credits. At $0.025/credit, 2400 credits would run you $60. PER DAY.

Sorry, I'll be cancelling and going back to UAW. Had good results with it and I see no reason to overpay so grossly, for basically the same service.

 

[DamageX]

Thanks for bringing this to my attention

You're welcome. I was actually hoping of bringing it to the attention of the people behind HighPRSociety as well.

I mean, seriously, this must be a mistake? 'Cause if I do a run of 10 articles daily, to 400 blogs, I end up paying $9,000 per month. That just can't be right, can it?

If it is then it makes highway robbery look like petty theft.

 

[Poppa Rotzee]

OK, my review.

Good diversity, good average PR.

EXPENSIVE though. With UAW I can submit pretty much unlimited number of articles per day, for a fixed cost per month. The articles get published on 400+ sites each time, at no additional cost.

With highprsociety, you get charged for every blog on which your article gets published. So say I want to publish 2 articles a day, to be listed on 400 sites each. This would add up to 3 credits/article x 2 articles x 400 (blogs) = 2400 credits. At $0.025/credit, 2400 credits would run you $60. PER DAY.

Sorry, I'll be cancelling and going back to UAW. Had good results with it and I see no reason to overpay so grossly, for basically the same service.

Hello, first I would like to point out that comparing UAW and HighPRSociety is apples to steaks.. not even on the same playing field. All UAW articles are on sites that are PR0 and PR N/A.

High PR Society post your articles on sites with PR1 - PR6. Of course its going to cost more and no, it is not the same thing. I mean, if your looking at just cost and don't care about quality, you can go on fiverr and get 10,000 blog comments for $5

You have your good links and you have your cheap links. The good balances out the bad, but you cant except to take a UAW budget and expect to apply it on High PR articles for the same AMOUNT of links. Thats like going into a steak restaurant and complaining about spending $40 on one steak and saying "HEY, wtf... I can get 40 hamburgers at McDonalds for $40." Yeah, you can but if your goal is to impress the girl (Google)...what do you think is going to get you in her pants, putting 40 McDonald hamburgers on her plate, or one nice $40 dollar steak? lol

Disclaimer: Not that guys ever do that ;P

 

[DamageX]

Hello, first I would like to point out that comparing UAW and HighPRSociety is apples to steaks.. not even on the same playing field. All UAW articles are on sites that are PR0 and PR N/A.

High PR Society post your articles on sites with PR1 - PR6. Of course its going to cost more and no, it is not the same thing. I mean, if your looking at just cost and don't care about quality, you can go on fiverr and get 10,000 blog comments for $5

Cool, let's say you're actually offering higher quality, which I won't argue against, I don't have time for that crap.

However, comparing the costs of your "Rolls Royce" with the costs of the "Toyota" I'm currently driving, I'm looking at a $8933 difference, per month.

For the same amount of articles submitted through UAW for $67/mo, I would have to pay you $9,000/mo. That's almost 135x my current cost.

I assume using your "Rolls Royce" will also increase my rankings/profits by a factor of 135? I mean, it surely must, or you wouldn't think of overpricing it so grossly, would you?

 

[DamageX]

You have your good links and you have your cheap links. The good balances out the bad, but you cant except to take a UAW budget and expect to apply it on High PR articles for the same AMOUNT of links. Thats like going into a steak restaurant and complaining about spending $40 on one steak and saying "HEY, wtf... I can get 40 hamburgers at McDonalds for $40." Yeah, you can but if your goal is to impress the girl (Google)...what do you think is going to get you in her pants, putting 40 Mcdonal hamburgers on her plate, or one nice $40 dollar steak? lol

Disclaimer: Not that guys ever do that ;P

Google: "Oh shit, this guy pays out the ass for his backlinks, let's give him a good rank! That's the least we can do, since the moron is paying 135x the going price!"

Yeah, that's gonna happen... :sgrin:

 

[Poppa Rotzee]

Cool, let's say you're actually offering higher quality, which I won't argue against, I don't have time for that crap.

However, comparing the costs of your "Rolls Royce" with the costs of the "Toyota" I'm currently driving, I'm looking at a $8933 difference, per month.

For the same amount of articles submitted through UAW for $67/mo, I would have to pay you $9,000/mo. That's almost 135x my current cost.

I assume using your "Rolls Royce" will also increase my rankings/profits by a factor of 135? I mean, it surely must, or you wouldn't think of overpricing it so grossly, would you?

Yeah, thats why I can rank a site with just 10 High PR links. Especially post panda. BUT if its volume your after...we can give you 60,000 links a month for 65.00 at our other service

http://www.dripfeedlinks.com/


I'm not telling you this stuff because I'm bias.. We sell High Quality links AND low quality links...what I'm telling you is based on experience from not only ranking our own clients...but selling tools to SEO guys and seeing the effects from different tools, keywords and link types. We track EVERYTHING we've ever done, good or bad. The key is diversity, brother.

 

[DamageX]

Yeah, thats why I can rank a site with just 10 High PR links. Especially post panda. BUT if its volume your after...we can give you 60,000 links a month for 65.00 at our other service

DripFeedLinks


I'm not telling you this stuff because I'm bias.. We sell High Quality links AND low quality links...what I'm telling you is based on experience from not only ranking our own clients...but selling tools to SEO guys and seeing the effects from different tools, keywords and link types. We track EVERYTHING we've ever done, good or bad. The key is diversity, brother.

Honestly, I think you're full of shit. But I'll humour you.

I'm gonna run a campaign with UAW for a month and target a single page. I'm gonna run a campaign with your service for a month and spend the same on it, targeting a different (but equivalent) page. Both pages will have equal on-page SEO and target the exact same keyword, I'll pick something easy.

My money's on UAW wiping the floor with your service. Wanna put your money where your mouth is?

 

[Poppa Rotzee]

Google: "Oh shit, this guy pays out the ass for his backlinks, let's give him a good rank! That's the least we can do, since the moron is paying 135x the going price!"

Yeah, that's gonna happen... :sgrin:

A more accurate analogy is would you trust 4000 unknown (PR0) reviews telling you that "penis enlarger pills really work!!!!! We Swear!!!" or 3 close friends (PR3) telling you those pills are full of crap, and that stuff doesn't work.

Disclaimer #2: I doubt 3 of your guy friends would admit to needing those and then falling for the ads lol


Look, don't take our word for it. Do a reasonable test. Run 3 or 4 articles through UAW and then do 200 articles through us. We've done it. We had UAW before and after Panda.

 

[Poppa Rotzee]

Honestly, I think you're full of shit. But I'll humour you.

I'm gonna run a campaign with UAW for a month and target a single page. I'm gonna run a campaign with your service for a month and spend the same on it, targeting a different (but equivalent) page. Both pages will have equal on-page SEO and target the exact same keyword, I'll pick something easy.

My money's on UAW wiping the floor with your service. Wanna put your money where your mouth is?

Absolutely...in fact, I'll actually give you free credits to do the test. Let us know when you want to start the test. But we will need to know the keyword and the URLs so we can run rank tracker.

We don't lie, we do case studies all the time and we note failures and successes and have been open to the public with both. =)

 

[Gary Becks]

I can see where DamageX is coming from with this one. I didn't really pay much attention to this, but the procing scale for the system is screwed IMO. Lets stop and not copare it to UAW for a sec, but a more comparible and reputable service - BMR. For 59$ per month you can build a lot more links (though you should consider the writing a cost as well) on established sites with PR and almost guaranteed indexing.

Based on your pricing scheme to build just 1500 links per month using your service would cost 112$ which really makes no sense to me considering there are almost identical networks out there like traffic kaboom, blog blueprint, etc that charge a set price of around 50-60$ per month for the same thing.

Care to elaborate on why you feel your pricing is fair when compared to these other networks?

 

[DamageX]

Look, don't take our word for it. Do a reasonable test. Run 3 or 4 articles through UAW and then do 200 articles through us. We've done it. We had UAW before and after Panda.

Wait, wait, you want me to run a handful of articles through UAW and 200 through you? Hmmm, wasn't it you who said volume is crap and quality is what matters? :sgrin:

Absolutely...We'll even give you free credits to do the test. Let us know when you want to start the test. But we will need to know the keyword and the URLs so we can run rank tracker.

Now that wouldn't be fair if I let you know what I'm doing while I'm doing it, would it? I know you're not biased, but who's do say you won't make a slight mistake and massively backlink "your" target page accidentally?

Don't worry, I'll do a full disclaimer once the test is done. But there's no way in hell you get to know what's going on in the meantime.

 

[DamageX]

I can see where DamageX is coming from with this one. I didn't really pay much attention to this, but the procing scale for the system is screwed IMO. Lets stop and not copare it to UAW for a sec, but a more comparible and reputable service - BMR. For 59$ per month you can build a lot more links (though you should consider the writing a cost as well) on established sites with PR and almost guaranteed indexing.

Based on your pricing scheme to build just 1500 links per month using your service would cost 112$ which really makes no sense to me considering there are almost identical networks out there like traffic kaboom, blog blueprint, etc that charge a set price of around 50-60$ per month for the same thing.

Care to elaborate on why you feel your pricing is fair when compared to these other networks?

"Comparing apples to steaks" my friend. All other networks, except theirs, are shit.

 

[Gary Becks]

"Comparing apples to steaks" my friend. All other networks, except theirs, are shit.

Well to be fair, I understood his analogy in regards to comparing their network to UAW, it is 2 totally different things. But feeling like it's ok to charge more than established and proven networks like BMR, Traffic Kaboom, Blog Blueprint, hell I'll even throw ALN in the mix is just ludacris.

I had actually bookmarked their site and planned to use it, but now that you have brought their over priced pricing structure to the light, I'll wait to hear a response on this one first.

Kind of funny, I think because they allow people to just pay for credits no one so far noticed they were paying this much.

 

[Poppa Rotzee]

I can see where DamageX is coming from with this one. I didn't really pay much attention to this, but the procing scale for the system is screwed IMO. Lets stop and not copare it to UAW for a sec, but a more comparible and reputable service - BMR. For 59$ per month you can build a lot more links (though you should consider the writing a cost as well) on established sites with PR and almost guaranteed indexing.

Based on your pricing scheme to build just 1500 links per month using your service would cost 112$ which really makes no sense to me considering there are almost identical networks out there like traffic kaboom, blog blueprint, etc that charge a set price of around 50-60$ per month for the same thing.

Care to elaborate on why you feel your pricing is fair when compared to these other networks?

OK, BMR

1. Our network is larger

2. The average PR for BMR is 1.7 the average PR for High PR Society is 2.7 (BMR also has PR0's in its network, the LOWEST we have is a PR1)

3. We don't have difficult article writing approval process (This alone can save you $100's or $1000's a month, if anyone has used BMR, they know what I'm talking about)

4. The pricing scheme: We are slightly higher than BMR ONLY if you use BMR at full tilt (which is basically impossible) other wise, we are way cheaper. Because if you don't use us, you don't pay.

Additionally: We offer High PR homepage links that don't roll off to PR0 or PR NA <--- THIS is the point of HPS, we sell High PR Homepage links, PR1 - PR6, that won't roll off to PR0 or PR N/A

The articles and comments are an option we provide, not the main selling point.


We won't be for everybody, but we aren't over pricing anything. We may not seemed priced right for certain people using us in a certain way, for others we are priced perfectly. Just depends on what you are doing. =)

Like I said, if you need low quality links...go to http://www.dripfeedlinks.com/

..and if your a linklicious Pro user, you get double the links for your purchase. So if you by 500 links, you'll get 1000 for the same price.

 

[Poppa Rotzee]

Wait, wait, you want me to run a handful of articles through UAW and 200 through you? Hmmm, wasn't it you who said volume is crap and quality is what matters? :sgrin:

Well, actually I never said volume is Crap. I said diversity is the best.

You said that UAW's article were the same as HPS's articles, just cheaper. I said, no..they aren't. HPS articles are higher quality and more effective article for article. I said test it out for yourself, you can even double or triple the articles you use at UAW in the test against HPS and you will see that HPS articles are more effective.

(That being said, You do realize that when I run 3 or 4 articles I meant to spin each one hundreds of times, right. Against 2 articles spun 100 each through us. So 400 UAW vs 200 HPS - See if they are "the same."

Now that wouldn't be fair if I let you know what I'm doing while I'm doing it, would it? I know you're not biased, but who's do say you won't make a slight mistake and massively backlink "your" target page accidentally?

Don't worry, I'll do a full disclaimer once the test is done. But there's no way in hell you get to know what's going on in the meantime.

Um..you do realize we can see anything you do with our tools anyway lol. I can log in as you right now and read every article you've posted, every keyword.

I wasn't asking for OURS, I would just need to know the UAW keyword and URL so that I know it is ranking as you say. I mean, how do I know you won't inflate the rankings? Use something that is already ranking? etc

I've done the tests, I know the results. We can do a private test just between me and you, if you think I would fix the test because of the test being public. I have no reason to lie...I'll give you the credits, so I make no money...and you can do the test for yourself. I've done the tests, I know, but If you think a UAW article is the same as a HPS then I say test it and see.

 

[Poppa Rotzee]

...... Continued

We have used UAW..we used BMR....we got tired of paying $100 a month for only 20 domains...(With us you can have unlimited domains btw)

..and for that $100 a month we could only get approved a few 100 post which were outsourced at $2.50 an article.

With us, you only pay for what you use. For the exact same price...you could post over 1300 articles on HighPRSociety, across a network with PR2.7 average (instead of across BMR's 1.7 average) and it is all without the ridiculously time consuming/potentially costly approval process.

 

[Gary Becks]

While I do understand your points (some of them) don't you think you're embellishing a bit?

1. Our network is larger

You said you guys had 4000 domains (yet to be seen) but that all of them are not being used as of yet.

Even if they were, this still isn't more than BMR.

2. The average PR for BMR is 1.7 the average PR for High PR Society is 2.7 (BMR also has PR0's in its network, the LOWEST we have is a PR1)

Where sis you get that average from? Sounds like something you just made up for your post. BMR has no pr 0 sites in their network, of course come sites do get affected by pr updates and turn to pr 0 (which you will inevitabley experience as well if you already haven't) but none of the sites are pr 0 when your links get posted to them and the sites that do drop in pr get removed from the network. I have never had a link placed on a pr 0 site in BMR.

3. We don't have difficult article writing approval process (This alone can save you $100's or $1000's a month, if anyone has used BMR, they know what I'm talking about)

Which means that the quality of your network is not on par with theirs. Sad but true fact is that crap content makes for crap sites.

4. The pricing scheme: We are slightly higher than BMR ONLY if you use BMR at full tilt (which is basically impossible) other wise, we are way cheaper. Because if you don't use us, you don't pay.

I wouldn't call twice the price slightly myself, of course if take into account a large number of domains then yes, but I personally only have 4 sites to rank right now so the price is quite different.

Additionally: We offer High PR homepage links that don't roll off to PR0 or PR NA <--- THIS is the point of HPS, we sell High PR Homepage links, PR1 - PR6, that won't roll off to PR0 or PR N/A

The articles and comments are an option we provide, not the main selling point.

Well if that's the point then why not just offer that then? If you are offering other services as well you have to not only stand behind them but make them competitive with the rest of the market in regards to pricing structure.

For the record I have no problem with you or your service, but the fact of the matter is that the way you have chosen to price the article posting feature really doesn't make much sense. You seem to focus on my comparison to BMR only and not the other networks mentioned as well, namely Traffic Kaboom wich has just as many sites and lets you post unlimited spun content for 197$ every 3 months using unlimited domains.

You are correct, you have every right to price things the way you want, but as a potential customer I would just like to state that IMO it would be nice to see a cheaper price for bulk monthly subscription orders. It would definitely be a plus for me. Until then I can't see myself paying more for the same thing I can get elsewhere.