[FREE] Current Web2.0 Blog List - 60 Websites

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks for the list.

The main problem with creating a bot is it will need to be constantly updated, as the Web 2.0's keep changing their log-ins or disabling posts.

Eeeeeeehhh they don't update them that much, and it's quite easy to tackle small modifications in less than 1-2 minutes
No doubt about whether it's worth doing it when you can run 4000+ web 2.0s with video and image embedding in a single day.

I let the bots create like 400-500 accounts on every site I want to post on, for diff sites/niches I'm working on for the next month or so, and the posting templates are very much the same month to month (at most sites).
Tumblr for instance is exactly the same as it was 8 months ago in all respects.
 
Thank you so much for this list. i mean it !
goes to my favorites and im starting working on it right away! thanks so much
 
Eeeeeeehhh they don't update them that much, and it's quite easy to tackle small modifications in less than 1-2 minutes
No doubt about whether it's worth doing it when you can run 4000+ web 2.0s with video and image embedding in a single day.

I let the bots create like 400-500 accounts on every site I want to post on, for diff sites/niches I'm working on for the next month or so, and the posting templates are very much the same month to month (at most sites).
Tumblr for instance is exactly the same as it was 8 months ago in all respects.

You do this all on zennoposter ?

I'm also loving it but because of being browser based, it would not be pretty fast, so you are able to create 400 accounts on multiple web 2s in a day ?
 
I let the bots create like 400-500 accounts on every site I want to post on, for diff sites/niches I'm working on for the next month or so, and the posting templates are very much the same month to month (at most sites).
Tumblr for instance is exactly the same as it was 8 months ago in all respects.

Hey Expertpeon, if you have time I have a few questions.

So I assume you're using spun content on these, correct?
Do you use 1 piece of content spun across the whole network?
Do you reuse these sites posting multiple times on the same ones, or is it Senuke 1 post wonder style?
Do your accounts get closed often because of this?
 
I'm also loving it but because of being browser based, it would not be pretty fast, so you are able to create 400 accounts on multiple web 2s in a day ?

Speed is irrelevant when content generation takes far far far far longer.
However, I can do, about, 10,000 acct registrations/day and keeping 2 scrapeboxes open sucking up bandwith.
What's the point of sockets when 50% of the sites SEnuke supports are microblogs and the other 50% don't work or get banned most of the time?
What's the point of sockets when ZP can run 2000-3000 posts/day with only 4 instances up? I dunno about you, but I cannot generate 1 10 sentence replacement article every single day as is!
ZP saves a ton on captcha credit too... about half of my expenses therein can now be redirected if I felt like it, into buying content (though good luck finding a good spinner I Have yet to find anyone that doesn't suck at it)

Hey Expertpeon, if you have time I have a few questions.

So I assume you're using spun content on these, correct?
Do you use 1 piece of content spun across the whole network?
Do you reuse these sites posting multiple times on the same ones, or is it Senuke 1 post wonder style?
Do your accounts get closed often because of this?
1) I use 10-15 sentence replacement, very good grammatically (even when spun), spun articles
2) Sure, if you consider 10-15 sentence replacements/sentence to be 1 article ;)
3) I reuse some of them, if I like the site or it's a particular pain to register there. One of the primary reasons SEnuke is so awful is because of its 1 post wonder style BS. I post at a minimum 3 articles per subdomain/account and sometimes (if it's not a subdomain like on rediff etc) I will do 10 articles per acct because it doesn't matter since you can pull the domain's PR to your pages with enough backlinks to your web 2.0s
4)The only site that has closed my accts is ekudos and 1-2 sites died on blog.com out of about 250 (by the way, with SEnuke and blog.com, the closure rate is more like 95%)
The secret is knowing what these sites want and giving it to them (ie change titles, taglines, and post grammatically correct content).

I've ran 5000+ wordpress POSTS to 700 wordpress accounts in a day recently (a week ago) and not a single link is dead.
That's because my templates rape, and everything looks like a real blog. No sample page, sample comments etc, everything's cleaned up and perfect.
 
Last edited:
Excellent info. One more clarification if you can.

By 10-15 sentence replacement, do you mean you write an article, then rewrite each sentence 10-15 times?
Do you do any synonym/phrase spinning at all?

Thanks again.
 
Excellent info. One more clarification if you can.

By 10-15 sentence replacement, do you mean you write an article, then rewrite each sentence 10-15 times?
Do you do any synonym/phrase spinning at all?

Thanks again.
Yes I do synonym and phrase spinning inside the sentence spinning 10-15 times
 
I never understood how to use web 2.0 except a few of them. You'r suppose to keep refreshing them with new unique content to get do follow links right?
 
Yes I do synonym and phrase spinning inside the sentence spinning 10-15 times
i am confused on automating tumblr.
it doesnt detect the box where the content can b input,i have few other sites automated but tmblr,the content input box is not detected,do you use the insert html box to put the content?
 
i am confused on automating tumblr.
it doesnt detect the box where the content can b input

Tumblr is post by email ... far easier to automate an outgoing email, try doing that.
 
I have a question... the general idea is to create a site or a blog in each of this services, pointing to my money making site ?.
 
i am confused on automating tumblr.
it doesnt detect the box where the content can b input,i have few other sites automated but tmblr,the content input box is not detected,do you use the insert html box to put the content?

Yeah, like with many many web 2.0s you must create 3 steps to post into the innerhtml
grab the area out in branch builder then paste innerhtml
Then generate the innerhtml through macros a step before that...
Worked just fine.

You will need to parse out the tumblr post link itself.

This is pretty much the best and most accurate method (and fastest) to post on most web 2.0s... it's much easier to parse the HTML from the DOC html generated for direct links and many many web 2.0s do not successfully detect the content area, so you must paste as described... it's not really that difficult, takes seconds.

Tumblr is post by email ... far easier to automate an outgoing email, try doing that.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you cannot email post youtube vids and embed them.
 
Last edited:
I have a question... the general idea is to create a site or a blog in each of this services, pointing to my money making site ?.

Yes, your right.

The main purpose of using Web 2.0 blogs is to get backlinks to your Money site, so you can boost rankings for your keywords in search engines :-)
 
Thanks for sharing this info. I was wondering, do these web 2.0 profiles and sites have to be updated constantly to get the do follow juice? or is it just large amount of unique content on each profile?
 
@Expertpeon ... are you saying you take an article, and every single sentence of that article you rephrase 10 to 15 times, and then each instance of that sentence you do thesaurus swapping of words? So that each sentence of your spins you have 10 to 15 different sentences, each with hundreds of possible combinations after you thesaurus swap?

And if you do that ... are you doing this all yourself or do you outsource it?

And finally, have you done tests where you find Google treats this ultra spun content far superior and ranks way better than a more simple spin? Or is the purpose of this to satisfy web2.0 moderators so your posts stick better?
 
@Expertpeon ... are you saying you take an article, and every single sentence of that article you rephrase 10 to 15 times, and then each instance of that sentence you do thesaurus swapping of words? So that each sentence of your spins you have 10 to 15 different sentences, each with hundreds of possible combinations after you thesaurus swap?

And if you do that ... are you doing this all yourself or do you outsource it?

And finally, have you done tests where you find Google treats this ultra spun content far superior and ranks way better than a more simple spin? Or is the purpose of this to satisfy web2.0 moderators so your posts stick better?

I haven't done side by side tests, but I have seen results for myself and 1 layer spun content does not help SERP at all (or nearly zero)

Every sentence is rewritten in completely different language (but effectively saying the same thing so that it makes sense) 10-15 times... I then go through this and synonym level spin it
Yes I do this all myself still as I cannot find an outsourcer that doesn't suck now that my harvard friend is too busy to help me.
I've tried probably 20 diff potential candidates and they all fail miserably.

I can usually get 9-10 articles of the spun thing approved at ezine for instance when I write it, and you're lucky if when someone else writes it its readable at all, so I demand a very high degree of verbal skills.

I've gotten this writing down to almost a science and although it's a grind to do them a lot, it still doesn't take over 2.5 hours to do it.
They stick better, they rank better, they last longer from my experience... I can index at least 5000 web 2.0s with a 15 sentence replacement article.

I've done a hand written article about a product and only spun it to 70% uniqueness once, did the same thing I do now, and the site (which was a very non-competitive niche unlike the ultra competitive markets I go after) didn't budge at all... it literally didn't move...

There's little doubt in my mind that it's worth it to do it this way... I think my bank's balance proves that much
 
Last edited:
Thanks for this list. You have put a lot of time and effort in producing this and it is very kind of you to share.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top