SEO Wiki Hijacking

[maradonna2010]

anyone know some more free open wikis?

wikia.com

-protected site:wikia.com -inurl:changes -inurl:message -inurl:file  -inurl:pagelist  -inurl:notify -inurl:space -inurl:links -inurl:history -inurl:tag -inurl:about -inurl:search

wetpaint.com

-protected site:wetpaint.com -inurl:changes -inurl:message -inurl:file  -inurl:pagelist  -inurl:notify -inurl:space -inurl:links -inurl:history -inurl:tag -inurl:about -inurl:search

are the only other 2 i've found

 

[itsjinx]

I respectfully disagree here .

I have many "no-follow" links which pops in Google Webmaster. And also, according to Traffic Travis 4.0 the best SEO juice i have from one of my website is from a no follow link.

I think you forgot the whole point of backlinking here. Why does Google care about backlinking anyway ?

Because it is a popularity indicator and when ppl share a link they doesn't care about do follow or no follow...

So, good backlinking campaign is the best fake popularity which leads to diversity

Moreover, the method here doesn't stick to wikispace only ....

The reason why you are wrong is because google explicitly says that the way webmasters AVOID user content links to spam websites is to ADD rel="nofollow". That means that any nofollow link tells google that there is a high likelyhood that it was added by third party user's, which have a much higher likely hood of being link building and not real incontent contextual links. Google does show nofollow links in webmaster but that doesn't mean that google is giving any "credit" for the link itself in is webpage ranking. I have tested many follow and nofollow link building techniques and there is absolutely a night and day difference between the two. just my 2 cents

 

[t0m3313]

Thank your sharing this method. There are not so many results for my specific country but it is still great!

 

[tony23]

The reason why you are wrong is because google explicitly says that the way webmasters AVOID user content links to spam websites is to ADD rel="nofollow". That means that any nofollow link tells google that there is a high likelyhood that it was added by third party user's, which have a much higher likely hood of being link building and not real incontent contextual links. Google does show nofollow links in webmaster but that doesn't mean that google is giving any "credit" for the link itself in is webpage ranking. I have tested many follow and nofollow link building techniques and there is absolutely a night and day difference between the two. just my 2 cents

So....you would rather have a d0foll0w from a spammed AA blog with 6 squillion OBL or a n0foll0w from the BBC/CNN/ETC?

 

[depth]

it is great info . need to be put into work thanks man

 

[floflo89]

Running true SB to see if I find something whit PR

 

[omida86]

I know people have ranked websites with only no-follow links so...

It only is about 10 % as effective as having a do-follow...

 

[marrrko]

Hey this is not moral

 

[HostStage]

The reason why you are wrong is because google explicitly says that the way webmasters AVOID user content links to spam websites is to ADD rel="nofollow". That means that any nofollow link tells google that there is a high likelyhood that it was added by third party user's, which have a much higher likely hood of being link building and not real incontent contextual links. Google does show nofollow links in webmaster but that doesn't mean that google is giving any "credit" for the link itself in is webpage ranking. I have tested many follow and nofollow link building techniques and there is absolutely a night and day difference between the two. just my 2 cents

If you believe everything that Matt Cutts says ....

I don't say no-follow = do-follow efficiency speaking, but what i'm saying it is looking more natural and you'll get more credit getting having a full link diversity.

 

[robertbruno]

any auto bot to this method? just try with wiki spam bot but this software not works for wikispace platforms

 

[resistosai111]

well If you have your own wikispaces sites just to go login and click on pages and click lock button your site will be protected and no one will do editting. example
http://spotting-between-periods80.wikispaces.com/Overcoming+Menstruation+Problems

 

[krilin50]

Wiki pages are a great source of link juice, nice one!

thanks a lot

 

[kytro360]

Who cares if the links are ******** or nofollow? A backlink is a backink. ******** or nofollow only affects page rank.

 

[kytro360]

Hmmm just got a little inspired, might code a bot about this, and share it for free on the forum

 

[uditbhansali]

Are wikispace backlinks strong?
Do they give a good boost?

 

[spoon22]

How can i protect my wikis from getting hijacked?

 

[Barbarossa]

How can i protect my wikis from getting hijacked?

Log into your account, select your article and click "Lock".

To verify that its protected, log out and go to your page as a guest. If you cant edit it anymore, that means we wont be able to mess with your wikis.

 

[Barbarossa]

Here is the simple method to inject your links into other people's
linkwheels. This is probably not new but anyways...

I'll use Wikispaces as an example. Wikispaces is supported by SENuke
and other link building software. Hundreds of people build links and post
their stuff to Wikispaces. Fortunately for us, by default, wikis at Wikispaces
are public. This means anyone can edit it.

Do the following search in Google:

your keyword -protected site:wikispaces.com

You will find tons of pages created by SEOs. They are most likely already
a part of linkwheels and have some relevant backlinks pointing to them.

Just edit these pages and inject you link. You may go completely evil
and replace someone else's money site link with your link or just add your
links. Then, add them to Linklicious so they get re-crawled. Done.

And remember to protect your own wiki pages.

Is this footprint still working? A lot of protected pages are coming up for me.

 

[techcrunked]

how do i protect my own wiki's?

 

[1337WuLF]

This is awesome! Thank you!