Get your backlinks indexed with AMR

[Abstroose]

I tried this yesterday and got 72 out of 72 backlinks indexed within a few hours.

1. Submit an article with AMR, export livelinks report and create a group for all directories which successfully returned a livelink (autoapprove).

2. Create a new article. Insert any title (preferably make it super-spun). In the article body, add:

{|http://www.site.com/backlink1.html}
{|http://www.site.com/backlink2.html}
{|http://www.site.com/backlink3.html}
{|http://www.site.com/backlink4.html}
..etc

I'd only suggest doing <100 links per article.

3. Submit article to autoapprove directories only (I got about 450 successful submissions).

That's all. I did this last night and woke up this morning to find all 72 backlinks indexed in Google, including many from a domain which I registered just yesterday (so works for indexing a site too).

 

[andreyg13]

This is actually good, i might try this and get back with the results

 

[balsagoth007]

Thank you Abstroose

 

[dannistone]

And that is why it's always a good idea to link back to an old post of yours!

 

[Abstroose]

This method is still super-effective. I get 99% of my backlinks indexed within 24 hours.. and I'm talking thousands.

 

[phpbuilt]

Maybe I'm being paranoid, but wouldn't Google see it as a linkwheel and devalue it? (The same directories you're using to make posts with for ranking are all interconnected to each other in a very obvious way). Maybe it would work great to submit your main posts to one group of directories and your indexing links to a different group of directories though.

I'm going to try this out, I think that article directories are a step-up above scrapebox/xrumer links, using article directories for your backlinks to article directories is worth testing with anyways.

 

[FuryKyle]

Basically you're saying not to use the spun article submitted by AMR to link back all to one site, but rather throughout the site?

 

[Abstroose]

Basically you're saying not to use the spun article submitted by AMR to link back all to one site, but rather throughout the site?

No, this is purely for getting backlinks indexed. For example, you could do an AMR blast with a quality, spun article containing one backlink to your site. After the blast, export all livelinks and then plug these in to AMR (as per the OP), and blast away. Pretty much all of the original backlinks will be indexed.

 

[server255]

Interesting method.... but one question:

Isn't {|http://www.site.com/backlink4.html} the same as just

http://www.site.com/backlink4.html

since there is nothing to spin? Or why the {}?

Thanks.

edit: or did you do the {} because of the forum?

 

[FuryKyle]

So you blast a quality article that links back to your money site, then blast a crappy, super spun article to the same AA directories that approved your initial article, but this time randomly linking to any one of them using spintax? Thanks and rep given!

 

[hqmw012]

I wanted to ask the same question as FuryKyle's Thanks and rep given also!

 

[balsagoth007]

Interesting method.... but one question:

Isn't {|http://www.site.com/backlink4.html} the same as just

http://www.site.com/backlink4.html

since there is nothing to spin? Or why the {}?

Thanks.

edit: or did you do the {} because of the forum?

Have you seen this in the beggining: {| ?
When you use {|http://www.site.com/backlink4.html} sometimes it will give you http://www.site.com/backlink4.html and sometimes nothing, this only to give some variety in the links published on each article.
Hope it helps

 

[server255]

Have you seen this in the beggining ? "{|"
When you use {|http://www.site.com/backlink4.html} sometimes it will give you http://www.site.com/backlink4.html and sometimes nothing, this only to give some variety in the links published on each article.
Hope it helps

aah... so it DOES spin "nothing".. I didn't know that... all clear now!

 

[srvaliente]

gracias por el aporte

 

[livecricket]

Thanks for the info, will test tomorrow

 

[Abstroose]

Interesting method.... but one question:

Isn't {|http://www.site.com/backlink4.html} the same as just

http://www.site.com/backlink4.html

since there is nothing to spin? Or why the {}?

Thanks.

edit: or did you do the {} because of the forum?

As balsagoth007 explained, it adds some randomness to which links will be published.

So you blast a quality article that links back to your money site, then blast a crappy, super spun article to the same AA directories that approved your initial article, but this time randomly linking to any one of them using spintax? Thanks and rep given!

That's right, but it's not just for linking to your article submissions. I've used this for all types of backlinks, plus indexing pages from brand new websites.

 

[Abstroose]

this is not a new method, but i can vouch it works like a charm, i made a thread like this before

And the date of your thread was September, mine was June.

 

[sholing]

Good share mate, I am going to try this and post back my results!Bye.

 

[webmasterbd]

sounds interesting!never tried it before but definitely gonna do a test run to see if it works or not.

 

[harveybirdman]

If added rss feeds with urls of first articles in our server/domen in second articles, so it would be better?