BackBlasts + Linklicious = Wasted Money?

[jsnow]

So I've been trying BackBlasts (BB-100) + Linklicious combo for about a month now and I didn't get a single backlink. Am I doing something wrong with this straight forward system or is it just not working? Anyone had success recently building backlinks this way? Perhaps it takes more time, but if so - how long?

 

[asiriusthoth]

You've used linklicious and not a single backlinks has been indexed? I find that quite amazing. I've been using Linklicious Pro for about 3 weeks and i'm seeing most backlinks being indexed into Google.

I haven't used BackBlasts, but it looks like automated spam commenting... which I personally don't use.

 

[blackhatcodex]

Honestly, 100 backlinks are nothing. More than likely they are posting to forums or blogs, and then maybe 15% (25% if your lucky) of those are actually sticking. Then upon that, if they are giving you a bunch of PR0-PR1's (the ones that actually stick), then you might as well burn your money.

Forget about wasting your money on a service, just go straight to the source. Go purchase yourself Scrapebox, and then buy a Fiverr gig once per week, and you will see your results jump within slightly on week 2, and then dramatically on week 3.
The key is consistancy. However, by purchasing a cheap service, your still in the same league as everyone else is that wants quick results without actually putting in effort.

SEO success is measure by the effort you are willing to put forth.

 

[jsnow]

You've used linklicious and not a single backlinks has been indexed? I find that quite amazing. I've been using Linklicious Pro for about 3 weeks and i'm seeing most backlinks being indexed into Google.

I haven't used BackBlasts, but it looks like automated spam commenting... which I personally don't use.

I'm on Linklicious BASIC and yes - not a single backlink according to Google Webmasters and OpenSiteExplorer. BackBlasts is an automated forum profile maker. I've checked their reports - those links are out there and Linklicious gets them, but nothing is being indexed. What are you feeding to Linklicious? What's the difference between your backlinks and mine?

Honestly, 100 backlinks are nothing. More than likely they are posting to forums or blogs, and then maybe 15% (25% if your lucky) of those are actually sticking. Then upon that, if they are giving you a bunch of PR0-PR1's (the ones that actually stick), then you might as well burn your money.

Forget about wasting your money on a service, just go straight to the source. Go purchase yourself Scrapebox, and then buy a Fiverr gig once per week, and you will see your results jump within slightly on week 2, and then dramatically on week 3.
The key is consistancy. However, by purchasing a cheap service, your still in the same league as everyone else is that wants quick results without actually putting in effort.

SEO success is measure by the effort you are willing to put forth.

Thank you for your advise.

I know that 100 spammy backlinks a day is barely anything, but for this experiment it wasn't about the quality - I need a method that can get me a lot of incoming links on autopilot. As far as I can tell, BackBlasts makes only forum profiles. 100 profiles a day x 30 days = 3000 pages. Even if 1% survives - that's at least 30 backlinks, right? Why aren't they showing up anywhere? I can see them, they are out there and Linklicious is highly recommended (at least asiriusthoth is having success with it), so what's the problem?

I've been considering Scrapebox for a while, I should probably buy and try it then. I'm, however, beginning to loose my faith in SEO software. Tried several highly recommended programs already, just to realize that they aren't really helpful

What Fiverr gig are you talking about?

 

[thirdeye85]

Research link pushing man, do some manual work yourself.

 

[Tentanks]

Most of these services are just using software you can buy yourself. Xrumer, scrapebox, zennoposter, etc. If they were able to use the software properly, they wouldn't offer the services because there is way more money $$$ in doing it for yourself than selling it to someone else.

 

[phpbuilt]

I used backblasts for a month at their highest tier (2k links a day). At the end of a month I'd say yahoo siteexplorer found about 450 links to one of my sites which had 500 a day assigned to it through backblasts, another with 500 got about the same, the rest would be hard to say because they already had backlinks.

You really get what you pay for, $9 isn't much. I don't think hardly anyone can say they got awesome results on a medium competition keyword after spending only $9. Under what basis are you saying you got zero backlinks though, yahoo siteexplorer or just guessing?

 

[phpbuilt]

If they were able to use the software properly, they wouldn't offer the services because there is way more money $$$ in doing it for yourself than selling it to someone else.

That isn't accurate at all. To do a campaign you're looking at keyword research, original content creation, website creation with theme, seeking proper authority links within your niche ... these spam links are just icing on the cake.

There's people who can't write, who aren't website designers, who don't take the time to grow a site properly for authority links, but they know this software well. There's absolutely nothing wrong with specializing in one thing for some money.

Not to mention the benefits of automation. If its automated, then any money received for doing SEO services is practically free. If its automated you could very well be averaging 1k an hour for the time you spend promoting other people's sites (which is practically none).

 

[Pobman]

Most of these services are just using software you can buy yourself. Xrumer, scrapebox, zennoposter, etc. If they were able to use the software properly, they wouldn't offer the services because there is way more money $$$ in doing it for yourself than selling it to someone else.

Not so. Many of these services are automated beyond belief... so the returns are quite decent compared to actual work required.

 

[asiriusthoth]

Most of the links I process through Linklicious are SenukeX. web2.0, social networking, press release, article, some forum profiles etc... The forum profiles do not stick well, but the others do quite good.

BackBlast.. forum profiles, thank you for correcting me.. good to know.

 

[Rushdie]

2k * 30 days is 60k backlinks for 69$ whereas i can get 1mil verified backlinks for 100$ with outsourcing.

 

[phpbuilt]

2k * 30 days is 60k backlinks for 69$ whereas i can get 1mil verified backlinks for 100$ with outsourcing.

Cool, where from?

 

[clyde]

LOL, GWT and OSE are two of the worst tools you can use to find backlinks.

Try YSE/Ahrefs/Majestic instead.

 

[DamageX]

2k * 30 days is 60k backlinks for 69$ whereas i can get 1mil verified backlinks for 100$ with outsourcing.

PM me the source of that gig, please. Thanks.

 

[subster]

My experiences with linklicous was not soo satisfying. I use backlinks indexer from another forum member here and see a great rush in my G webmaster account of links which have been never found before. Great service for indexing (not just crawling)

 

[blackhatcodex]

Don;t hate on linklicious...it doesn't give you backlinks, just pings your backlinks over a duration of time.

Honestly, a decent coder could code you a similiar script in PHP.
1. Have a list of sites
2. Setup cron every 24 hours
3. Script grabs 100 links and pings, then removes from list
4. The next day it grabs an additional 100 links, pings, and removes.

 

[subster]

Don;t hate on linklicious...it doesn't give you backlinks, just pings your backlinks over a duration of time.

Honestly, a decent coder could code you a similiar script in PHP.
1. Have a list of sites
2. Setup cron every 24 hours
3. Script grabs 100 links and pings, then removes from list
4. The next day it grabs an additional 100 links, pings, and removes.

Yes I do know that, I am just talking about efficancy. Results matter, nothing else.

 

[flaw3d]

Your using linklicious, with my experience it doesnt work.
Try another backlink indexing program and you should see results.

 

[WARHOL]

@ OP It really depends on the quality of the backlinks you made.

Lol linklicous doesn't index your backlinks, its for crawling.
For me linklicous is good for xrumer blast. 50k a day around 8% will be indexed.

See the comparison

http://backlinksindexer.com/comparison

Im with nuclear link indexer @ the moment because the owner is a member here and i got big discount too, it seems good. I got around 70% link indexed in 2 weeks with wikipro + senuke. 96% Indexed with .edu/.gov links.

 

[dtang4]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't backblasts for building xrumer links?

First, if these are the backlinks you're building, I wouldn't link them directly to your main site. Secondly, I think it would be very difficult to get them indexed as a backlink. Linklicious is probably getting them crawled, but nothing more.

Instead of backlinks + linklicious, what I suggest (which is what I do) is linkpushing + backlinksindexer. Linkpushing gives you good quality links across 3 tiers, then backlinksindexer gets those indexed + another tier of decent links. I also recommend writing and spinning your own articles for linkpushing to ensure that they're still readable. I even get traffic to my site from the spun articles I generate thru linkpushing.