SEnuke... I'm doing it wrong.

Narrator

Power Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
507
Reaction score
398
Hi everyone,

There are constant threads of people praising SEnuke, but I cant seem to get results from it.

Here is my latest attempt to rank a moderate competition keyword.

  • I set up a 2-tier pyramid with Web 2.0's, social networks, and social bookmark links. With each run I get about ~150 links.
  • I then blast the url list with 10,000 forum profiles using xrumer.
  • Then I ping the profile links using linklicious, set to ping all urls within 24 hours.

I did 15 of these campaigns, and my ranking for that keyword hasn't changed at all. I get better results with one direct blast with SB.

If anyone can offer me some tips to get results with SEnuke that would be awesome.

Cheers!
 
are they indexed?
How long have you waited since your last blast for results?
How spun is the content?
How are you backlinking the forums?
 
are they indexed?
How long have you waited since your last blast for results?
How spun is the content?
How are you backlinking the forums?

Many of the links were indexed from the first few blasts. I had to wipe that server and lost my logs, so I can't check the most recent blasts. :/

Last blast was about 2 weeks ago. I was doing one campaign a day.

The content was all spun with TBS. For the social networks I would spin an article from ezines with TBS.

No, I am not backlinking the forum profiles, just submitting the urls to linklicious.

Cheers!
 
Many of the links were indexed from the first few blasts. I had to wipe that server and lost my logs, so I can't check the most recent blasts. :/

Last blast was about 2 weeks ago. I was doing one campaign a day.

The content was all spun with TBS. For the social networks I would spin an article from ezines with TBS.

No, I am not backlinking the forum profiles, just submitting the urls to linklicious.

Cheers!

SEnuke creates only layer 1 of any tiered pyramid, though it can make some variance in the tiers for you.
2 weeks isn't very long for 15 campaigns... do they show up in SEO spyglass?

I'm curious why you didn't write articles and why you pulled them from ezine? I would check seo spyglass first and see... if most are in there than I'd say you just need to keep going.
 
Unique Content is REALLY REALLY IMPORTANT after the Panda.Improve on that one.

BTW,if you can get SERPS rise by SB blast,then just do the SB last.
 
I have the same issues with senuke, but have realized results after up to 4 weeks. It takes time to be indexed unless you ping and RSS aggregate all your links. Also you have to remember that link pyramids only convert to money site ranking changes several weeks later as you're not blasting the money site directly. Its safer, it looks more natural, but it requires patience!
 
Hey mate I think you should wait atleast 2-3 weeks to see the results.
Also you will see a better result if you collect all the links from SenukeX and make a SB blast on them.
 
What's the competition strength?

You might want to wait, as others have said. From whatever I've experienced recently, I've had better results letting the links index themselves rather than forcing them, running them through BE clusters, etc. Of course, that takes a little more time.

I can't seem to find a technical fault with your approach. Just wait and watch! :-)
 
Hi everyone,

There are constant threads of people praising SEnuke, but I cant seem to get results from it.

Here is my latest attempt to rank a moderate competition keyword.

  • I set up a 2-tier pyramid with Web 2.0's, social networks, and social bookmark links. With each run I get about ~150 links.
  • I then blast the url list with 10,000 forum profiles using xrumer.
  • Then I ping the profile links using linklicious, set to ping all urls within 24 hours.

I did 15 of these campaigns, and my ranking for that keyword hasn't changed at all. I get better results with one direct blast with SB.

If anyone can offer me some tips to get results with SEnuke that would be awesome.

Cheers!

With Senuke, a web 2.0 page with an article is called a "social nuke," while a web 2.0 profile with nothing but a link is called a "web 2.0 nuke." They make it kind of confusing for some reason, but web 2.0 pages with articles and submissions to article directories are given the same label, "social nukes," for whatever reason. If you're doing your "web 2.0 nukes," meaning web 2.0 profiles with nothing but the user info and a link, and you're pointing them to your money site, that could be your problem. Those links are considered spammy, along with Xrumer and Scrabebox blasts, and if you send those types of links to your money site it usually doesn't work too well and sometimes it'll get your site punished, especially if it's a new site. It's best to send spammy links to your other urls which link to your money site rather than your money site itself. So I don't know if you have a problem or you just need to be more patient, but if you have a problem it's that you're sending your "web 2.0 nukes," meaning your "spammy profile with just the link" links, directly to your money site instead of to urls that point to your money site.
 
Last edited:
How competetive is the KW and how long till your first blast ?
 
Back
Top