Blast site with SB

You will be fine, as long as you don't ping the links. let the big G find 'em naturally

Nonsense...use linklicious.me and just set up a scheduler so you can drip them out naturally, yet guarantee they get found.
 
pin the links = bad?

If you use the common pingers out there "Pingfarm" "BulkPing" Massping" etc. They will only ping once (even though it could take 2-7 pings to get them found) and the other problem is they ping them all at same time.

This can be bad if you have a lot because you go from 0-10,000 immediately. Thats whats great about linklicious...everything is automated...it pings your links until google crawls them AND you can set up a schedule so they drip out at a natural pace that YOU set. Its safe.
 
Hi, I got a website which is about 2 weeks old and has about 141 backlinks, I am going to blast it with a 3k sb blog list I got given.

They are all wordpress blogs and have low PR 1 <

Will my site get sandboxed?

LOL yeah, most likely... but does it matter?

Sandboxing / filters ONLY matter if your site is making money.

If your site isnt making any money (as it has no links), then what does it matter?

That said, for new sites its usually better to go for small numbers of good links than lots of crappy ones... I never use SB for mass crap. A better use is to use SB to find high value commentable sites, and put a smaller number of legit comments on those sites.

Methods for doing this are on this and other forums... if you dig around you will find tips on how to find high pr commentable pages with SB
 
instead of going for a high traffic niche and working your bum off in seo, go for a low niche with low seo input needed, i got a blog ranked page 3 by google in a couple of days for aroundf 10 profile backlinks , pr 1-5 , that seems better !
 
Hi, I got a website which is about 2 weeks old and has about 141 backlinks, I am going to blast it with a 3k sb blog list I got given.

They are all wordpress blogs and have low PR 1 <

Will my site get sandboxed?

Almost certainly, but does that matter?
Sandboxing ONLY matters if your site is making $$$.

If your not making $$$ then it is of no consequence, you need to get its rank up, and the sanbox / filters are only temporary.

That said, I am not a fan of scrapebox AA myself and would be inclined to launder those links via other sites / pages already linking to you.
 
If you use the common pingers out there "Pingfarm" "BulkPing" Massping" etc. They will only ping once (even though it could take 2-7 pings to get them found) and the other problem is they ping them all at same time.

This can be bad if you have a lot because you go from 0-10,000 immediately. Thats whats great about linklicious...everything is automated...it pings your links until google crawls them AND you can set up a schedule so they drip out at a natural pace that YOU set. Its safe.

very interesting didn't know that :)
 
You are much better off writing about 10 quality articles, submitting them to ezines, linking them to your site and blasting the F*$% out of the article links. Its called a buffer. Get a little less link juice but its much safer.
 
Almost certainly, but does that matter?
Sandboxing ONLY matters if your site is making $$$.

If your not making $$$ then it is of no consequence, you need to get its rank up, and the sanbox / filters are only temporary.

That said, I am not a fan of scrapebox AA myself and would be inclined to launder those links via other sites / pages already linking to you.

This is only partially true. If the site is not making, you are right he is loosing nothing but the opportunity to make money. If the site gets sandboxed or marked as a spam site. It will take much longer to recover and make money and therefore could be considered a loss of income.
 
Back
Top