Building LinkPush? Stop and Read - UC LinkPush- My 500th post

[Fernando Torres]

Hell this is useful, I've book marked this.
Lets hope this will help me with SEO <3!

 

[NitroCan]

Good post man.

I would like to add few words.

If you are doing manual web 2.0 properties (Like I do), you should social bookmark them and SB blast them for faster indexing and results are really good. Linking a web 2.0 property to another web 2.0 property wont do that good as at the end of the day, they both have to been social bookmarked inorder to get indexed.

 

[Stu784]

In SENuke X their article spinner allows you to add more than one article, so for example you could have anything up to 3000-5000 words per article. Then it allows you to spin it and set the word count.

Then when SENuke goes out to create each property it takes a different portion of the conjoined articles, which have been spun, and places a version on each property.

SO IN SUMMARY:

Scrape multiple articles and join - SPIN everything - Create smaller unique articles from bits of the original larger one - create properties using the outputted articles.

or

Tool to conjoin articles - Auto Spin in TBS - Save 100+ articles - submit using favorite auto tool

If this portion of SENUke could be coded as a separate tool it would be really useful.

 

[NapsteR]

Good post man.

I would like to add few words.

If you are doing manual web 2.0 properties (Like I do), you should social bookmark them and SB blast them for faster indexing and results are really good. Linking a web 2.0 property to another web 2.0 property wont do that good as at the end of the day, they both have to been social bookmarked inorder to get indexed.

I do bookmark the urls. But I am not currently using sb blasts. But i'm thinking to do it though. Thanks for sharing your view...

 

[NapsteR]

In SENuke X their article spinner allows you to add more than one article, so for example you could have anything up to 3000-5000 words per article. Then it allows you to spin it and set the word count.

Then when SENuke goes out to create each property it takes a different portion of the conjoined articles, which have been spun, and places a version on each property.

SO IN SUMMARY:

Scrape multiple articles and join - SPIN everything - Create smaller unique articles from bits of the original larger one - create properties using the outputted articles.

or

Tool to conjoin articles - Auto Spin in TBS - Save 100+ articles - submit using favorite auto tool

If this portion of SENUke could be coded as a separate tool it would be really useful.

When u do like that in senuke x, splitting 5000 words in to 10 articles, those articles will be readable? I didnt use senuke x before . I stopped using it when they change the name in to senuke x from senuke. I'm gonna try it once again.

IMHO, tbs and spinnerchief is the best for these jobs.

 

[NapsteR]

No i don't forget that, what you don't seem to understand is that if Google wanted to check if content is spung that they need a massive amount of computer power... because it is not just me dumping spung content on the web, whit me there are thousands of webmasters dumping content to.... checking for similarities is doable but ate very high cost....

And Google is a business and i am 100% sure that they do not check spung content... all my results proof me right...

It is the same thing with link pyramids, somehow a lot of webmaster believe that Google is checking out every sort of linkscheme they come up with, they go out of there way to remove any kind of footprint cus God Google might see that the links are not natural....

That is the same bullshit, Google doesn't have that kind of power, sure simple linkwheels with web2.0 properties, but that is it... take it for what it is worth to you.







take it for what worth to you...

Alright, good luck with your duplicate content link building. I never said, if you use spun contents you wont rank. Try my method once and compare it with your spun link building. See, the difference. If you rank first page with 500 links from spun contents, you will be able to rank from just 50 links from these unique contents. This is based on my experience, I tried it with more than 50 domains now. But if you think otherwise, who am i to correct? No one knows what is happening inside google..

 

[NapsteR]

Hell this is useful, I've book marked this.
Lets hope this will help me with SEO <3!

Sure it will mate.

PS: I was huge fernando torres fan until he left to chelsea.

 

[johndoes]

I also believe what happened with Panda update is certainly not the detection of spun content but an indirect procedure to eliminate low quality pages.

- They may have devalued particular sites that contained spun content (like sites that have "article" in domain name, lots of repetitions throughout the site)
- They may have tweaked the algorithm to catch similar linking schemes.
(like two links at the resource box, number of words between links)
- They devalued the links that came from content /pages at all (have strong evidence for that)

I could rank low competition pages with AMR easily, but now nothing seems to work. There must be a way out. I'll find that

No i don't forget that, what you don't seem to understand is that if Google wanted to check if content is spung that they need a massive amount of computer power... because it is not just me dumping spung content on the web, whit me there are thousands of webmasters dumping content to.... checking for similarities is doable but ate very high cost....

And Google is a business and i am 100% sure that they do not check spung content... all my results proof me right...

It is the same thing with link pyramids, somehow a lot of webmaster believe that Google is checking out every sort of linkscheme they come up with, they go out of there way to remove any kind of footprint cus God Google might see that the links are not natural....

That is the same bullshit, Google doesn't have that kind of power, sure simple linkwheels with web2.0 properties, but that is it... take it for what it is worth to you.







take it for what worth to you...

 

[NapsteR]

I also believe what happened with Panda update is certainly not the detection of spun content but an indirect procedure to eliminate low quality pages.

- They may have devalued particular sites that contained spun content (like sites that have "article" in domain name, lots of repetitions throughout the site)
- They may have tweaked the algorithm to catch similar linking schemes.
(like two links at the resource box, number of words between links)
- They devalued the links that came from content /pages at all (have strong evidence for that)

I could rank low competition pages with AMR easily, but now nothing seems to work. There must be a way out. I'll find that

thats what I'm talking about. try this uc link push. It works..

 

[Jake79]

Hey again

So let me get this right... you only post 1 article on each blog? and does site like weebly.com and webs.com work aswell even though they are not blogs but websites?

-Jake

 

[olimix]

i think you are true about unique content .
I created 40 tier 2 free blog :
10 with unique unspin article ( scrapped from google news then translated to my website lang ) , all got indexed .
30 with spun article (92% uniq ) no one got indexed .

 

[NapsteR]

Hey again

So let me get this right... you only post 1 article on each blog? and does site like weebly.com and webs.com work aswell even though they are not blogs but websites?

-Jake

Yes jake. They work too.

 

[NapsteR]

i think you are true about unique content .
I created 40 tier 2 free blog :
10 with unique unspin article ( scrapped from google news then translated to my website lang ) , all got indexed .
30 with spun article (92% uniq ) no one got indexed .

That sucks man.. Well, try out my method. It works well..

 

[fujing]

which social bookmarks do you submit to? which program do you recommend for social bookmarking?

 

[NapsteR]

which social bookmarks do you submit to? which program do you recommend for social bookmarking?

With this uc link push, I dont have problem in indexing the urls, I will submit every blog I create to google.com/addurl . From this itself the links are getting indexed. However, I will submit the links to digg alone.

If you want you can use bmd...

 

[alezopeda]

Few questions: you create a new blog per post? so xxx.blogspot.com per link to your site right? when you create another push, you create another blog like xx2.blogspot.com?
Next question: doesn't it seem unnatural that your backlinks come from blogs which only have one post?
Next question: Do you find that its fine to use the same blog providers(blogetery, blogger,wordpress,etc) with new accounts to create the backlinks? For example for the first link push its loseweight.bl0gger.c0m and for the next linkpush u have another losefat.bl0gger.c0m?

 

[NapsteR]

I was about to start building some link push just before I saw your post.

At first I was thinking about creating about 9 2.0 blogs and build some kind of pyramid with it. and send each 2.0 to 3 bookmark site and post about 20 articles per 2.0. This sure sounded like a lot of work and may be a little overkill for an easy to rank 3k exact search per months but I might give your strategy a shot.

The question that was coming to my mind is which 2.0 do you use? you stated wordpress and blogger but how to know if they are monitored or not?

I'm really interested in trying your method. I have this nice small niche with 3k search and I have the EMD and the CPC is about 4$.

I hope to get it up to first place because right now it's sitting in 9th spot and doesn't get any visitor

Anyway could you explain where you create these 2.0? Because from what I understand if I just create 4 blogger or WP.com the link juice wont be as good since it's the same domain right?

I hope this make some sense, I typed this at work with a lot of interuptions

I use 5 to 20 normal web 2.0 sites like blogger and wp. When you build links, you will create a blog for each post. Like, post1.blogspot.com, and post2.blogspot.com . They are considered as two different domains. So, you will get link juice.

 

[internalsoul]

Thats a very nice Post Napster. We have been doing the same thing for the last 6 months (3 months on BHW with our service) but we are doing it with link pyramid. Well, as you have mentioned and unique content for every tier and truly it really works. We have been doing that for a long time. Just few notes i would like to add to your method(for others).. if you are doing it manually, so complete every tier with a good interval of time. That will again benefit you in long run. Try to change your username for every tier and again that might help you in leaving less footprints. As napster has said try not to use same web 2.0 site for any of your tier, . Try to mix article directories and web 2.0 sites in your tiers to make it look natural.

 

[NapsteR]

Few questions: you create a new blog per post? so xxx.blogspot.com per link to your site right? when you create another push, you create another blog like xx2.blogspot.com?
Next question: doesn't it seem unnatural that your backlinks come from blogs which only have one post?
Next question: Do you find that its fine to use the same blog providers(blogetery, blogger,wordpress,etc) with new accounts to create the backlinks? For example for the first link push its loseweight.bl0gger.c0m and for the next linkpush u have another losefat.bl0gger.c0m?

Nice questions mate..

Here is how I build it.

xxx.blogspot.com, and xxx.wordpress.com are first tier. xxx1.blogspot.com and xxx1.wordpress.com are second tier.

I dont link between, xxx.blogspot and xxx1.blosgpot since its same platform. I link blogspot to wp and vice versa.

Yes, it may look odd to have back link for single post blog. But you dont get more than 3 or 5 or 7 links (see the image). I think its normal to have just 5 links for a single post blog.

And there is one more thing. Reusing these blogs for another site. this will increase the post counts and link juice.
Hope this helps..

 

[NapsteR]

Thats a very nice Post Napster. We have been doing the same thing for the last 6 months (3 months on BHW with our service) but we are doing it with link pyramid. Well, as you have mentioned and unique content for every tier and truly it really works. We have been doing that for a long time. Just few notes i would like to add to your method(for others).. if you are doing it manually, so complete every tier with a good interval of time. That will again benefit you in long run. Try to change your username for every tier and again that might help you in leaving less footprints. As napster has said try not to use same web 2.0 site for any of your tier, . Try to mix article directories and web 2.0 sites in your tiers to make it look natural.

thanks for adding your valuable points mate. Yes, i agree with you on giving out interval. In fact I follow that method in my services too.