AMR Success Rates ?

[spookycookie]

I have recently started using (a licensed!) version of AMR.
Was wondering what kind of success rates / live links / and # accounts I can expect?

SO far I think i have made around 3500 accounts
And of each (heavily spun) article posted, perhaps 2/3 (sometimes more) are successful when posting to around 300 healthy sites, so 200 successful posts.
Of the successfully posted articles maybe 1/2 (at most) produce live links (100)
so 100 live links from 300 posts to 90%+ health sites.

Also if The Best Spinner says 90% unique for 1000 word, how many articles would you post to?
Does this seem about right? Any advice is appreciated.

 

[balsagoth007]

Please refer to this awesome post about http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo-tools/320030-amr-tips.html

I have recently started using (a licensed!) version of AMR.
Was wondering what kind of success rates / live links / and # accounts I can expect?

SO far I think i have made around 3500 accounts
And of each (heavily spun) article posted, perhaps 2/3 (sometimes more) are successful when posting to around 300 healthy sites, so 200 successful posts.
Of the successfully posted articles maybe 1/2 (at most) produce live links (100)
so 100 live links from 300 posts to 90%+ health sites.

Also if The Best Spinner says 90% unique for 1000 word, how many articles would you post to?
Does this seem about right? Any advice is appreciated.

 

[spookycookie]

Thanks, I have spent the last hour and a half reading tips on using it in Debbie's thread alone. - made interesting reading!
I think it's a great tool, clearly there's a lot to learn to improve success rates.
Just felt this thread would be a quick way to compare stats rather than reading literally hours of posts from noobs struggling to get to grips with it.
Thinking my success rate isnt bad really.
Best tip so far was increasing the category list, adding new directories. lowering threads and increasing timeout period.
Any other quick responses rather than spending another 2 hours reading other posts?
Helpful concise comments are most welcome, annoyance at creating a new thread isn't. Thanks in advance.

 

[jumpjumper]

I normally get around 350+ live articles when I use AMR.

 

[Caius]

I only got about 300 live links on my last submission. I wish I could find a way to get that to 500+, I guess finding more sites and adding them to the tool will help.

I found some lists on here and various other places which added a few thousand directories that didn't come with AMR stock. That helped quite a bit.

 

[Laser]

Also if The Best Spinner says 90% unique for 1000 word

I have yet to generate a "90% unique" article.
I'm curious as to how well it reads.

How is the grammar in such an article,,
does it appear to be spun or,,
does it appear to be written by a human ,,,

or maybe a drunk human?

 

[FuryKyle]

The thing about free AMR lists is that sometimes some of them will bug your computer. Same thing with BMD. I tried a 25k+ AMR list here and saw my AV blocking off loads of malware. That's why I usually just use the preloaded list.

 

[spookycookie]

I got 90% unique having 4 variations of each sentence, and some alternative paragraphs. Spinning every word/phrase possible with exception of key phrases. It takes me ages, but I think it should be worth it as it reads pretty well by a human. I check the spinning pretty carefully. I know some people will spin something in 45 mins, but it takes me 2-3 hours to do a 600 word article with multi level spinning.

Am i wasting my time? lol. hope not.

 

[mcgoohan6]

I got 90% unique having 4 variations of each sentence, and some alternative paragraphs. Spinning every word/phrase possible with exception of key phrases. It takes me ages, but I think it should be worth it as it reads pretty well by a human. I check the spinning pretty carefully. I know some people will spin something in 45 mins, but it takes me 2-3 hours to do a 600 word article with multi level spinning.

Am i wasting my time? lol. hope not.

I spin manually and it takes me about 2 hour. But it's legible. I can use it on my web 2.0 sites and with some extra content I sometimes post it first on my money site.

I think it's worth it, but I do sometimes think of taking the easier way out, maybe for links to my 2.0's but not my money site.