Best friend adding programs

[mountainman]

What works best right now?

 

[fifizoc]

FFAP is great but has a few problems...

 

[moneyrocks]

ffap is full of issues now and right now these is no good software in market to do that waitting for a new one to come out.....

 

[SpuriousGer]

ffap is full of issues now and right now these is no good software in market to do that waitting for a new one to come out.....

I am not one to complain about software prices and would be happy to pay money for a great script, but 600$ for facebook friend adder pro is a bit much.

I basically need a script that adds people that fulfill certain criteria, it seems like this is not possible with it. Is there a script that does that?

 

[phatzilla]

A little surprising how there's no decent software out for this yet. It's a pretty big market.

 

[Crazy]

007cpa out of nowhere with 7 posts and is the authority on FB apparently. FFAP might be the best compared to its market counterparts (none), but it's far from useful. In fact to some degree it's detrimental, as accounts have a tendency to be disabled due to footprints left behind from its activity. The fact that you would suggest otherwise proves you have limited experience with the software.

 

[Josh-Emm]

facebook blaster pro updated and are using a quicker method i think you should try it.

 

[Crazy]

Further I didn't claim that FFAP doesn't leave a footprint.

Didn't say you did.

The question wasn't whether it is wise to use software or not, which your response falsely indicates/implies and diverts away from the original purpose.

My post doesn't at all imply software automation isn't wise.

The OP's question was basically... should someone decide to use software, which one is the best.

Exactly, and FFAP is definitely not the best (where "best" is "the ideal solution"); as I said, it's probably to your detriment to use.

There are several "counterparts" out there... I've tried most of them.

I wasn't aware, but if they are worse than FFAP I'm content to remain ignorant to this fact.

My opinion is FFAP is by far the best...

I know, that's exactly what my post addresses.

Whether or not to use software is a totally separate discussion in and of itself.

Agreed, I didn't make any such assertion.

I agree with the risk... it is there...

It is, moreso w/ FFAP as many of the ex-FFAP clients will attest.

...anything automated creates footprints.

Not true.

just because I started posting with a new account (lost login details for an old account), doesn't mean I haven't been around and don't know sh!t.

What was your old account? I'm sure an admin will be happy to restore access.

Edit: I also apologize if I came across as inciting a personal attack, but Lively has been at the heart of many issues on this forum. He's done a lot of people wrong and treated many of his clients like shit. To see a random new comer stick up for someone who has disrespected many people around here is very aggravating.

 

[SpuriousGer]

SpuriousGer: What does "fulfill certain criteria" mean? We'd have to know exactly what that means to recommend a product that meets those needs.

For example, I want to find people who go to university X and live are city Y and are above the age of Z.

 

[Crazy]

The thread that outlined all of Lively's stupidity was closed/deleted at his request. I'm not 100% certain if it was deleted, but it was certainly closed.

As to the matter of footprints...

That is true imo to such a great degree that it might as well be absolute (for the majority of us). There are only a handful of people running a few programs that can effectively "automate variation" (classic oxymoron)... very, very, very difficult to do as 99.9% of automation, even with programmed "variation", can be easily detected with strong enough heuristics and/or enough time to collect data, and compare it against genuine variation. The automated variations (almost) always and eventually reveal themselves loud and clear... assuming someone is looking (and FB et al are certainly looking)... but, this is just my opinion.

What you're suggesting would be a predictable pattern of behavior by all FB users... surely you're not suggesting that 300-500 million active users (or whatever they're claiming these days) can be pigeon holed so absolutely as to isolate "automated variation." Not sure I follow how that's an oxymoron either, considering a properly seeded randomization used to coordinate standard actions would constitute sufficient variation to qualify as humanistic variation. In my opinion it would actually be too varied, to the extent it wouldn't even appear humanistic thus requiring a throttling of sorts; induced programmatic predictability I suppose, or limiting the degree of variance. But like you said we're speaking as objectively as possible, I can only assume the efforts of programmers wouldn't be so easily shot down due to a perceived or imagined level of heuristics.

Out of curiosity though, what was your previous username?

 

[Josh-Emm]

Im a fucking Skid and got jacked.

 

[auuuu]

I sometimes still use Facebook Blaster PRO For adding friends with an ID list, seem work fine here

 

[mark17]

yeah,facebook blaster pro works but is very limited witha accounts changing etc....

 

[mark17]

anyways,so what you guys think ffap is good enough to get targeted fans...I have nearly 1000 fb non pva accounts which are pretty new...how many targeted fans can I achieve per day with that??

 

[Kethy]

anyways,so what you guys think ffap is good enough to get targeted fans...I have nearly 1000 fb non pva accounts which are pretty new...how many targeted fans can I achieve per day with that??

20-30 friends per account per day according to experience. If you have enough proxies (5 accounts with one proxy), you can add about 20000-30000 friends with your 1000 FB accounts by FFAP everyday.

 

[polygon]

For example, I want to find people who go to university X and live are city Y and are above the age of Z.

Flirt can do all of those searches with its smart folders.