Twitter - Staying Under the Radar

[webwhizz]

It's nothing to do with Tweet Adder. It's how you set up each account, what you tweet, how often and how aggressively you follow/unfollow.

IP may come into it, but Tweet Adder I'm 99.9% certain is nothing to do with why accounts are banned.

PS: Tweet Adder does not use the API.

it uses json call up method for DM's which counts towards your hourly 350 api limited,

DM,S are restricted to 250 per day per account

 

[muchacho]

it uses json call up method for DM's which counts towards your hourly 350 api limited,

DM,S are restricted to 250 per day per account

I read Twitter's limit was 150 calls per hour?

 

[webwhizz]

I read Twitter's limit was 150 calls per hour?

yeah you might be right i thought it was 350,so that makes even worse, all i know is if your banging the client rate limit in tweetadder ,thats not good, cos that warning is coming from twitter for too many requests

 

[muchacho]

yeah you might be right i thought it was 350,so that makes even worse, all i know is if your banging the client rate limit in tweetadder ,thats not good, cos that warning is coming from twitter for too many requests

If a follow counts for one of those it wouldn't make sense as I run 2 accounts on 1 IP and they follow/unfollow every 1 minute (or there abouts).

I think a 'call' is when you DM but especially when you update your follow/following numbers. I only saw the warning once and it was when I chose to update my following/followers every 1-2 minutes. I now have it at around every 15-20 minutes so it shouldn't be an issue.

 

[webwhizz]

I read Twitter's limit was 150 calls per hour?

yes just read this from twitterdev

OAuth calls are permitted 350 requests per hour.

Anonymous calls are based on the IP of the host and are permitted 150 requests per hour.

 

[webwhizz]

If a follow counts for one of those it wouldn't make sense as I run 2 accounts on 1 IP and they follow/unfollow every 1 minute (or there abouts).

I think a 'call' is when you DM but especially when you update your follow/following numbers. I only saw the warning once and it was when I chose to update my following/followers every 1-2 minutes. I now have it at around every 15-20 minutes so it shouldn't be an issue.

Im not sure i dont think one follow is 1 hit but 10 might be 1 hit, i cant figure out how tweetadders follow system works. i follow/unfollow every 7-15mins i was sending welecome messages but as my followers went up i started hiting the limit so i dont use dms anymore

 

[muchacho]

Im not sure i dont think one follow is 1 hit but 10 might be 1 hit, i cant figure out how tweetadders follow system works. i follow/unfollow every 7-15mins i was sending welecome messages but as my followers went up i started hiting the limit so i dont use dms anymore

Well if you go to the DM page it asks you how often to check for new followers - so reckon that could be classed as a hit.

I generally only send 3 or 4 thank you messages an hour so I definitely don't send one to everybody. It might be an idea to turn the thankyou option off.

7-15 minutes? I guess for new accounts that could work ok, but the more followers you get the more you want to be following and the quicker you'll want to be following them.

 

[webwhizz]

Well if you go to the DM page it asks you how often to check for new followers - so reckon that could be classed as a hit.

I generally only send 3 or 4 thank you messages an hour so I definitely don't send one to everybody. It might be an idea to turn the thankyou option off.

7-15 minutes? I guess for new accounts that could work ok, but the more followers you get the more you want to be following and the quicker you'll want to be following them.

i have 150 accounts with aprox 4000 followers on same ip so im just leaving it at 7-15 minutes at the mo, i did have proxies but it seem to run so slow, on my other computer which is diffrent ip uses my neighbours unscure router, im setting up 400 accounts to start with and all they will do is follow back so i can get my app up and running and sell followers

 

[misshoneybee]

totally clean = only account created and logout

I have only 3-4 posts with each account to made ​​it look real, that's it

auto follow 1-2min (1000max)
follow back (default settings)
unfollow (default settings) (1000max)

that was my setup running 24/7 on my dedi server on the same Ip for over 8weeks

and tweetadder uses api take a look at my screenshot:

omg I cant post a little image: bit point ly slash i5Lgva

 

[docdizzle]

This is a great thread, I have been looking for something like this. I just started in with my tweet attacks endeavors a couple weeks ago. So far I have figured out a few things...

1. Unconfirmed accounts with no followers created on public proxies that send @replies last about 10 minutes lol.

2. Just posting regular tweets with no links a lot in the first few days seems to help with keeping accounts alive.

3. Using private proxies works waaaayyyyy better.

4. People on twitter are stupid hahahaha

No but seriously I had one thought about using public proxies to create the accounts and then private proxies to manage them. If it's true that they associate activity with accounts that were started on the same IP and you use public proxies (which get abused like tina turner)to create your accounts then when some other bhatter does something shitty using that same proxy your accounts could get fucked. Just my thoughts.

As of now I am working with 102 accounts in my niche, for some reason 4 of them got suspended on day 2 even though I didn't do anything different with them. Otherwise though the other 98 accounts are running fine on 12 private proxies. I am keeping my follower limit to around 200/day for now and easily adding 1500 people per 24 hours. I still haven't promoted anything yet, I plan to be patient about it and just keep posting random news and shit until all of the accounts go over 1k so I can keep them running smoothly.

That's just my opinion on the matter...

 

[docdizzle]

Also do you guys trust the stats from bit.ly? I have noticed a huge difference between their stats and my affiliate account stats.

 

[webwhizz]

totally clean = only account created and logout

I have only 3-4 posts with each account to made ​​it look real, that's it

auto follow 1-2min (1000max)
follow back (default settings)
unfollow (default settings) (1000max)

that was my setup running 24/7 on my dedi server on the same Ip for over 8weeks

and tweetadder uses api take a look at my screenshot:

omg I cant post a little image: bit point ly slash i5Lgva

auto follow 1-2min (1000max) maybe thats your problem, its too quick for 46 accounts on one ip

 

[Tricia]

I don't understand how can you be suspended.
I got +700 followers overnight (0 followers on 1st day, +700 on 2nd day) and nothing happened. No suspension at all.

 

[webwhizz]

i think tweet attacks is too aggressive if some receives a mention and they dont like it, all they have to do is hit the report abuse link. im sure alot of these accounts get reported, cos they might be chating to there mate on twitter about an ipod then the next thing they get bombarded with stuff about buying one.

 

[webwhizz]

Hey as anyone had the update on tweetadder today?

well i updated it and now it errors every 30mins and restarts its a real pain wish i hadnt bothered

 

[misshoneybee]

yeh tweetadder version 110422 keeps crashing...

 

[elibaba7]

yea it crashes a lot

 

[Pegg02]

Hi Guys - Just signed up after finding this post.

I installed the new build on two computers and both crash after a few minutes of running time.

has anyone sent a message to Tweetadder about a fix for this?

 

[webwhizz]

Hi Guys - Just signed up after finding this post.

I installed the new build on two computers and both crash after a few minutes of running time.

has anyone sent a message to Tweetadder about a fix for this?

I have no response yet, im using older version for now

 

[jhonson5]

Yeah, I appreciate with your concern; but you know it is a mater of individual choice and how he wants to be appear out there. However, I rally like that thought.