[METHOD] Get backlinks from Wikipedia

aren't all wikipedia links nofollow? I have links on their site for the traffic, but what good is it to add your link to where you get no traffic or seo benefits?
 
aren't all wikipedia links nofollow?

yes they are dont loose your time you're right

Man everytime I see one of your posts it's for complaining. Whats wrong with you?
See Ubaid's linkabove it can surely help you.
 
yes they are dont loose your time you're right

Man everytime I see one of your posts it's for complaining. Whats wrong with you?
See Ubaid's linkabove it can surely help you.

was my post complaining about anything? get the fuck over yourself, I was just wondering what benefit you get for spamming wikipedia when you get neither seo benefits nor click traffic from dead discussion pages. :rolleyes:
 
was my post complaining about anything? get the fuck over yourself, I was just wondering what benefit you get for spamming wikipedia when you get neither seo benefits nor click traffic from dead discussion pages. :rolleyes:

I meant criticizing more than complaining if you prefer. People like you are boring. And if you dont see the advantage of getting BLs from a trusted site you better go masturbate in front of an old marylin monroe movie, jerk.
 
aren't all wikipedia links nofollow? I have links on their site for the traffic, but what good is it to add your link to where you get no traffic or seo benefits?

This was my first thought as well. What's the point of going to all of this trouble for a nofollow link that won't even bring in traffic? I'm not trolling or trying to be a jerk--I'm honestly wondering if I'm missing something here. :confused:
 
I don't know I think I did it right lol we will see, I was only able to find sites in like french and stuff I donno used google translate whatever added my link randomly in 2 posts around 2007 - fist time doing it thanks for the tip
 
Good post.. I think I might write a macro for this to post some links. Thanks for the share.
 
i'll try to test this out...

i have a position 6 website that i havent touched for awhile, going to get a few hundred of these links then blast each one to get them crawled.
 
Every good SEO (and most of the bad ones) know that Wikipedia NoFollows all external links. Having said that, a lot of people have noticed that their sites get a significant boost in the SERPs whenever they get a link from Wiki. It might just be coincidence, but it makes sense. NoFollow was originally introduced by Google to clean up the link spam, particularly on sites like Wikipedia and Yahoo Answers. And it worked. Wikipedia used to be spamtown, and now it's pretty clean with a userbase that doesn't take any shit and is quick to remove any obvious spam. It's fair to say that there's nowhere near as much spam in Wikipedia than there used to be. It also makes Wiki an amazing source of content that almost always links out to high quality, authoritative, accurate sites.

This puts Google in a slightly awkward position. They could keep this excellent source of authoritiative links NoFollowed, and miss out on having a more relevant index *or* they could remove the NoFollow on the Wiki links and risk the place becoming spamtastic again.
In truth, they've probably gone with option 3. Secretly following Wiki links but making them appear to be NoFollow. This helps prevent the site getting spammed, and lets Google capitalise on the authoritative links.
I'm going to finish with a quick and easy method of getting a trusted Wikipedia account.




If you've got a trusted account, it's easier for you to sneak in a few well placed links of your own.

1. Search Google for common spelling mistakes
2. Search Wikipedia by searching Google for site:en.wikipedia.org "spelling mistake" -intitle:talk -intitle:user
3. Fix the spelling error, make sure you've selected "This is a minor edit"
4. Repeat over time
In time you'll have an account that's build up a history of fixing errors. Easy.


Code:
http://sharkseo.com/whitehat/does-wikipedia-pass-juice-problemasticated/
 
I meant criticizing more than complaining if you prefer. People like you are boring. And if you dont see the advantage of getting BLs from a trusted site you better go masturbate in front of an old marylin monroe movie, jerk.

criticizing? show me the advantages of getting hundreds of no follow backlinks FROM THE SAME DOMAIN (regardless of trust, hundreds of links same domain = very little added benefits) and I'll concede to you. You're obviously a fucking noob who obviously doesn't know the difference between his own asshole and a backlink. I love trolling noobs.
 
Good post.. I think I might write a macro for this to post some links. Thanks for the share.

Save your time and effort. Getting a ton of no follow links from the same domain won't give you any SEO benefits.
 
don't bother with the method if you don't think it will benefit you, dork-face.
 
i'm sure you know what you're talking about muddbutt. someone who trolls forums must be very wise and knowledgeable.

brb going back to experimenting AKA science.
 
there is a huge chance of google considering nofollow links from authority websites. if i were a search engine i would consider. my 2 cents
 
i'm sure you know what you're talking about muddbutt. someone who trolls forums must be very wise and knowledgeable.

brb going back to experimenting AKA science.

ooh fighting words! assuming things doesn't make you any money either! This place is becoming more and more like DP every single day. Enjoy wasting your time "experimenting aka science :rolleyes:" with blasting nofollow links to the same domain. rofl.
 
Wow, great method.

This should be moved in the Jr.VIP section, IMO.
 
i did this method but i never knew how to check backlinks. sorry but this is a newb question - how do you check backlinks?

my old method was to go on yahoo then type in linkdomain:wwwdotexampledotcom
 
Back
Top