AC auto viewer?
- Thread starter Rkelly
- Start date
Hmmm dude they are listening to you and you gonna make them take this sugar from my mouth. Shhhhh keep it quiet for now pls
Money2spare
BANNED
- Sep 13, 2008
- 503
- 960
Lol, I just love it when Bhnoobz makes posts
bhnoobz
BANNED
- Jul 26, 2008
- 394
- 113
Yeah, wondering is great.. How long do you think they would pay out on bullshit traffic? It's a sad world we live in when people waste their time 'wondering' how to defraud something to steal money. Take the same time you spent wondering on how to defraud them and write more articles? Do something else?
matapples01
Regular Member
- May 15, 2008
- 358
- 210
Yeah, wondering is great.. How long do you think they would pay out on bullshit traffic? It's a sad world we live in when people waste their time 'wondering' how to defraud something to steal money. Take the same time you spent wondering on how to defraud them and write more articles? Do something else?
Sometimes I love the edge in your post and sometimes it's a little over the top. That aside, the irony of your post questioning a method to "defraud" someone sitting above your cookie stuffing banner is pretty comical.
bhnoobz
BANNED
- Jul 26, 2008
- 394
- 113
So someone generating false traffic to earn money per view compares to cookie stuffing how?
Someone is using false traffic to receive something for nothing. That traffic will never convert, it won't help the merchant or the provider it only wastes resources and money.
Cookie stuffing forces a cookie on someone so the person that sets the cookie receives commission on the sale.. The merchant still makes a sale... Someone else just gets to share the proceeds..:sombrero: How does that compare to fraudulently raising views to receive money?
matapples01
Regular Member
- May 15, 2008
- 358
- 210
So someone generating false traffic to earn money per view compares to cookie stuffing how?
Someone is using false traffic to receive something for nothing. That traffic will never convert, it won't help the merchant or the provider it only wastes resources and money.
Cookie stuffing forces a cookie on someone so the person that sets the cookie receives commission on the sale.. The merchant still makes a sale... Someone else just gets to share the proceeds..:sombrero: How does that compare to fraudulently raising views to receive money?
Sure, the merchant still gets their sale but you haven't talked about the poor schlepp affiliate marketer who rightfully earned the commission but gets their cookie overwritten by a stuffer.
I'm not judging and have thought about stuffing myself but I'm not going to delude myself that I'm not screwing someone with CS either, and that someone is more likely an individual than a company.
bhnoobz
BANNED
- Jul 26, 2008
- 394
- 113
If the affiliate earned the commission the person would have ordered immediately after their cookie was dropped. So you're telling me all the 'visitors' that visit a site through an affiliate's link but don't complete the sale are still 'owned' by the initial affiliate?
giantsfan0806
Junior Member
- Aug 17, 2008
- 162
- 58
its starts at about $1.50 per 1,000 , if i am not mistaken.
but as your "status" goes up for the site i think you can make up to 3-4 bucks per 1000
but as your "status" goes up for the site i think you can make up to 3-4 bucks per 1000
matapples01
Regular Member
- May 15, 2008
- 358
- 210
Sorry...the affiliate SHOULD have earned the commission...but didn't b/c his cookie got overwritten with the stuff.
matapples01
Regular Member
- May 15, 2008
- 358
- 210
That's better than the money people were talking about making with that bidvertiser method and you wouldn't even have to mess with fake clicks.
almir
Power Member
- Jul 11, 2008
- 726
- 238
Come on man, bullshit traffic used for getting paid from AC, its pretty much in the same range as taking money for a sale you haven't got any connection to, except dropping the cookie to the buyer God knows where
What I want to say its - I don't care how do you, or anyone else makes his money, I don't preach about CS or anything else, that's not my problem, I wouldn't deal with CS as I wouldn't deal with this AC method, but it is pretty BS to preach someone about frauding AC, when you do pretty much same with any affiliate company you work with
fulleclipse
Regular Member
- Jun 11, 2008
- 266
- 182
And it is no different then blasting views/comments/rateings for youtube vids to get them on first page.
I am not knocking anyones Ideas to find a way to make an extra buck, just short of stealing money via CC fraud( I don't condone that ). There are a couple ways you could probably do this with proxies and a couple add ons for firefox. Do a little g00gle reasearch and look at the addons for FF and you will come up with something.
I am not knocking anyones Ideas to find a way to make an extra buck, just short of stealing money via CC fraud( I don't condone that ). There are a couple ways you could probably do this with proxies and a couple add ons for firefox. Do a little g00gle reasearch and look at the addons for FF and you will come up with something.
Not to diss the author's idea, but I think Newmanhia has a point.
Let's be contented with the upfront payments and just stick with mass outsourcing or 'DNSing' the articles. We don't want AC to go bankrupt early or be more strict with their guidelines. It's for our own sake in the long run.