this is *******, the reporter whose work you?ve posted here on your blog. *********, the Oscar-nominated director interviewed here, tipped me off to your blog entry.
At first I was happy to learn of a blogger writing about my reporting, ******?s excellent film, and this critical issue of PTSD. When I saw this post, however, I was outraged. Your readers need to know that, one, you?ve posted a significant portion of the interview without ever contacting me or obtaining permission to publish my work. You don?t even give your readers a link to real interview, which can be found here:
http://************.
Second, and most outrageous, you?ve copied and pasted the article incorrectly, posting bizarre jumbles of words that neither ******* or I ever said. For example: ?Why should people ********** to your project.? Or: ?We are you ******* you?re seeking.? Or: ?that is what the project?s about: ******** up the old, the painful, ********* as great as renewing as great as **********.?
I?m baffled as to how this could have happened. Perhaps a virus attacked your computer and deleted half of the article?s words. Or maybe you used an outdated program to translate the interview into a foreign language, then translated it improperly back into English. For background, I checked your other blog posts and stunningly found that each of them contained the same bizarre, off-kilter linguistic jumbles of a student with special needs struggling to learn English as a second language.
I demand that you either take down this post or copy and paste the original article correctly, providing a link to the actual interview:
http://**********. It would be reprehensible if you left your post up there as it is, giving your readers the false belief that ********** and I actually said the words that you?ve attributed to us.
If you?d like to contact me, you can reach me through my website:
http://*********/contact.
