when you say "blast it"...

[ralix]

hi guys,

I read a lot threads talking about "blast your web2.0 sites with scrapebox",

my question is, when you do the blast of comments, does the anchor text pointing to your web2.0 sites are all random english names or your keywords? and how is that make difference?

really thanks.

 

[Total Noob]

I usually do a bunch of long tails for my 2.0 sites even if I'm not trying to rank my money site for them at that point.

Looks a bit more natural IMO, and my objective of blasts is to get G to say "Damn, look at all these people linking in, this 2.0 rocks!" - any related anchor text will do that.

 

[dragonlube]

Its important to have an anchor text but not necessary, whats more important is not to get your self banned, before you start anything, make sure you know the precautions needed to be taken, from there on just spin your anchor text and comments throughly, use private proxies, dont over do it and if the site is still fairly new, I would try to delete any blogs harvested below pr1 so to not get too much crap on your resume.

 

[ralix]

That really make sense. thank you.~

I usually do a bunch of long tails for my 2.0 sites even if I'm not trying to rank my money site for them at that point.

Looks a bit more natural IMO, and my objective of blasts is to get G to say "Damn, look at all these people linking in, this 2.0 rocks!" - any related anchor text will do that.

 

[SweetChuck]

Do you guys put your anchor text in the "names field" or in the Comment body . I heard that Google is starting to red flag keyword in the Names sections , just what I heard ?

 

[stumpyb]

I usually do a bunch of long tails for my 2.0 sites even if I'm not trying to rank my money site for them at that point.

Looks a bit more natural IMO, and my objective of blasts is to get G to say "Damn, look at all these people linking in, this 2.0 rocks!" - any related anchor text will do that.

cheers!