Scraping forums with scrapebox, how to filter out the good ones

stealthstorm

Newbie
Joined
Nov 2, 2010
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
So after scraping for forums I have a list of over 100,000 urls. But not all of them are actual forums.

So there are plenty of urls not worth anything to me, what is a good way of filtering the non forum links out of there?

Doing it manually is going to cost alot of time, or is this the way to go? I can't really imagine a way that can do this accurate.

Hope you can help.
 
So after scraping for forums I have a list of over 100,000 urls. But not all of them are actual forums.

So there are plenty of urls not worth anything to me, what is a good way of filtering the non forum links out of there?

Doing it manually is going to cost alot of time, or is this the way to go? I can't really imagine a way that can do this accurate.

Hope you can help.
I wish to know it too .
You can put them on web http://profilemachine.com and try to convert them (sort) or use SICK platform reader to sort them by platform , but if you put 100K urls it will crash for sure (will crash if you try to sort only 10K urls) so I would like to know it too , how other users filters good ones.
 
Use more targeted footprints to avoid this problem, instead of usual "powered by smf" etc...
 
Use more targeted footprints to avoid this problem, instead of usual "powered by smf" etc...
More targeted footprints requires better proxies because scrapebox proxies are almost all of them dead for operator footprint extracting , when I search for new ones they are also bad for google operator footprint searches , and to buy private proxies , because of searching of more targeted forums is for me very expensive task.
But you are right more targeted (accurate) extraction would resolve it.
 
This program works extremely well:

Code:
http://sickmarketing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1351
 
Register url for vbulletin footprint in scrapebox.

Code:
"Powered By vBulletin" + "In Order to proceed, you must agree with the following rules"

And if u got a list of 100k, then split down these to 10 part. Run in Sick Platform reader.

Bam!
 
This program works extremely well:

Code:
http://sickmarketing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1351
Very nice tool but crashing , I hate splitting the files before running it , 10K is maximum to run it .
 
More targeted footprints requires better proxies because scrapebox proxies are almost all of them dead for operator footprint extracting , when I search for new ones they are also bad for google operator footprint searches , and to buy private proxies , because of searching of more targeted forums is for me very expensive task.
But you are right more targeted (accurate) extraction would resolve it.

I use a method read here:

- get around 15-20k proxies from different places (not internal source)
- test, remove failed, filter over 2,000ms
- rinse and repeat until you get a nice list of few hundreds great public proxies for harvesting
- until it finishes a batch of keywords+queries I already find other proxies with another sb license
- etc
 
I use a method read here:

- get around 15-20k proxies from different places (not internal source)
- test, remove failed, filter over 2,000ms
- rinse and repeat until you get a nice list of few hundreds great public proxies for harvesting
- until it finishes a batch of keywords+queries I already find other proxies with another sb license
- etc
Kappa thank you very much , but I do the same , but I bet you never will be able to get many results on some operator footprint like inurl:..... , never , you can have many results for "powered by ...." but never for inurl: which are much more accurate
 
I use "powered by" and inurl something like profile or whatever that platform has for its member's profile pages. Probably over 90% of the urls it grabs are actual forum member profile pages.

This way it's likely they will public and not private. Also try using marketing keywords to find forums that aren't heavily moderated. If you see a profile with an old viagra link in it then it's probably smooth sailing.
 
I use "powered by" and inurl something like profile or whatever that platform has for its member's profile pages. Probably over 90% of the urls it grabs are actual forum member profile pages.

This way it's likely they will public and not private. Also try using marketing keywords to find forums that aren't heavily moderated. If you see a profile with an old viagra link in it then it's probably smooth sailing.
Thanks for suggestion , but I am trying to find more targeted market (nightclub's , stripclub's blogs - forums etc) . I run an agency for lap dancers (I have income from that ) and BHW forum I use to work more greyhat and try to earn also some money with my websites where I am describing those clubs (thanks BHW I learn better SEO when I see some tips , hacks , little cheating and can use better tools I had till now ) , but I can't write common comments on those blogs & forums because my website(s) are intended to be serious websites , I can't allow to spam . I only want to be better than my other whitehat thinking and working competitors using techniques like scrapebox to find High PR relevant blogs & forums for commenting them with real (unfortunately) manual comments with links to my website . That's why I try to find exactly what I need by operator footprints (not every opened public blog on this planet , but HIGH PR my niche relevant blogs & forums for making manual comments ( it sounds terrible , but I don't know other solution how to gain precious backlinks and do not spam....

If I put inurl:.......... my footprint in scrapebox become immediately enemy to Google and refuces every proxy I have . So I can only use " quotes " to get some extractions , inurl: footprints are more targeted - accurated but I don't want to buy private proxies because of that.
 
Last edited:
You know all those footprints, it seems to work just as well when you put all the footprints in the keyword area...so you get alot more connections as well instead of just one.

But I guess this is old news?

The only thing about scrapebox, it doesn't seem to keep digging and digging.....have to start harvesting over and over again.
 
Last edited:
More targeted footprints requires better proxies because scrapebox proxies are almost all of them dead for operator footprint extracting , when I search for new ones they are also bad for google operator footprint searches , and to buy private proxies , because of searching of more targeted forums is for me very expensive task.
But you are right more targeted (accurate) extraction would resolve it.

I noticed this too. The public proxies does not deliver accurate Google foot prints search results.
 
Back
Top