is linklicious.me ACTUALLY WORKING?
- Thread starter Sugirl
- Start date
Yes, that's the point of the free service. That was the initial goal of the site as well - to automate that portion of our boring SEO work.
What we immediately found is that Google doesn't crawl inside RSS feeds. So you can build them all day and night but the most you'll see is 10% crawls inside a feed. Once we pinged the links inside the feed and tracked it, THEN the crawls went to 100%.
I've been wanting to try the service. I think its fair to say that it should be judged on results in SERPS and not in link count totals. If the results are positive I don't care if my link counts go up, down or anything else.
I think many of us have experienced jumps in SERPS after an xrumer blast... without any visible increases in link totals... potentially this sounds like it should make these blasts more efficient... but I guess there is only one way for me to find out for sure... although the comments above have dampened my enthusiasm a bit.
I think many of us have experienced jumps in SERPS after an xrumer blast... without any visible increases in link totals... potentially this sounds like it should make these blasts more efficient... but I guess there is only one way for me to find out for sure... although the comments above have dampened my enthusiasm a bit.
accelerator_dd
Elite Member
- May 14, 2010
- 2,447
- 1,022
Download the CVS with all the RSS feeds, open up Bookmarking Demon and social bookmark them all. Open senuke put thoes rss there and rss submit them. Life is bit harder then pushing a button "Start ranking".
derpywizard
Regular Member
- Sep 6, 2010
- 288
- 55
Bro, if you could tell me what settings you use for BMD (so accounts don't get banned) that are optimal, I would love you for life. I thought that it was best to use 1 account per bookmark (option is anti-robot or something in BMD) but it was too much work not to mention the failure rates of account creation, e-mail verification, and posting (all with private proxies at the time).
I still have it but I don't really use it.
theindiaphile
Senior Member
- Jul 26, 2010
- 831
- 247
I will stand up and say that Linklicious is worth it. Given that no one, to my knowledge, has come up with a foolproof indexing method, this is the best one out there by a long way. More than that, it saves you a heap of time and hassle. I've no doubt they'll continue to refine their methods but, to date, this is the best indexing option on the web.
- Jun 23, 2010
- 2,141
- 5,063
Out of the 7,000 links you submitted for me to test out linklicious, only a HANDFUL got indexed over a week. I appreciate your generosity though!
Yukinari84
Elite Member
- Dec 12, 2007
- 2,326
- 4,735
I use Linklicious and it rocks. It's one of the easiest ways to give your backlinking efforts a boost.
The new trend these days seems to be obsessing over backlinks getting indexed. It's no wonder obliterating competition has become easier...
- Jun 23, 2010
- 2,141
- 5,063
I use Linklicious and it rocks. It's one of the easiest ways to give your backlinking efforts a boost.
The new trend these days seems to be obsessing over backlinks getting indexed. It's no wonder obliterating competition has become easier...
Actually, the new "trend" is getting crawled as opposed to getting indexed. Obsessing over getting indexed links has been around foreverrrrrrrr
LOL. I think blekkoing is the new pinging is the new indexing is the new cache.
You know, everyone has their own methods and beliefs. All I do is encourage everyone to track what they throw at their sites and watch the SERPs. At the end of the day traffic (and money from it) is the goal. Anything that helps is good, hinders is bad.
So take what you read with a grain of salt, evaluate through your own tests, and take what works for you as your game plan.
You know, everyone has their own methods and beliefs. All I do is encourage everyone to track what they throw at their sites and watch the SERPs. At the end of the day traffic (and money from it) is the goal. Anything that helps is good, hinders is bad.
So take what you read with a grain of salt, evaluate through your own tests, and take what works for you as your game plan.
Hi,
It seems everyone is pitching in here with various comments but no one seems to have actually done a solid test of sorts. I track everything that I do and measure its impact and effectiveness so I would like to add my feedback here.
I (like most) need a quick way of getting my backlinks INDEXED! I used to use a manual process as follows-
1) seperate links out into groups of 15-25 (batch keyword cleaner)
2) create rss feeds of the links with icerocket (ubot)
3) submit the rss feeds with SENuke and Scrapebox
This actually got very good results without much work at all on my end, the bulk of the work was writring spun titles/descs for the creation of feeds.
The below is taken from my link tracking spreadsheet-
Date Unindexed Links
15/10/2010 2902
21/10/2010 2765
28/10/2010 2109
04/11/2010 1764
11/11/2010 1209
18/11/2010 865
25/11/2010 489
02/12/2010 217
09/12/2010 89
sorry it doesnt line up properly, but you get the idea.
So this month, I gave linklicous paid account a shot to see what it can do in terms of indexing.
On the 5th Feb I loaded 1,647 unindexed backlinks with spun titles and descs like I did above.
Today I have ran an index check and out of the 1,647 backlinks a grand total of 93 are now indexed.
So in summary, linklicious on its own will not get your links indexed. It does what it says on the tin, creates feeds and pings them. At no point has linklicious claimed or siad they will get your links indexed, they clearly say it will get them crawled and I think a lot of newbies are getting 'crawled' and 'indexed' mixed up.
What you need to do to get indexed, is take the feeds linklicous creates and then submit them to rss directorys which is what I will be doing today to complete my personal linklicous test.
Hope thats a bit more constructive to help people understand linklicious a bit better.
It seems everyone is pitching in here with various comments but no one seems to have actually done a solid test of sorts. I track everything that I do and measure its impact and effectiveness so I would like to add my feedback here.
I (like most) need a quick way of getting my backlinks INDEXED! I used to use a manual process as follows-
1) seperate links out into groups of 15-25 (batch keyword cleaner)
2) create rss feeds of the links with icerocket (ubot)
3) submit the rss feeds with SENuke and Scrapebox
This actually got very good results without much work at all on my end, the bulk of the work was writring spun titles/descs for the creation of feeds.
The below is taken from my link tracking spreadsheet-
Date Unindexed Links
15/10/2010 2902
21/10/2010 2765
28/10/2010 2109
04/11/2010 1764
11/11/2010 1209
18/11/2010 865
25/11/2010 489
02/12/2010 217
09/12/2010 89
sorry it doesnt line up properly, but you get the idea.
So this month, I gave linklicous paid account a shot to see what it can do in terms of indexing.
On the 5th Feb I loaded 1,647 unindexed backlinks with spun titles and descs like I did above.
Today I have ran an index check and out of the 1,647 backlinks a grand total of 93 are now indexed.
So in summary, linklicious on its own will not get your links indexed. It does what it says on the tin, creates feeds and pings them. At no point has linklicious claimed or siad they will get your links indexed, they clearly say it will get them crawled and I think a lot of newbies are getting 'crawled' and 'indexed' mixed up.
What you need to do to get indexed, is take the feeds linklicous creates and then submit them to rss directorys which is what I will be doing today to complete my personal linklicous test.
Hope thats a bit more constructive to help people understand linklicious a bit better.