BlackArcher
Registered Member
- Apr 11, 2009
- 64
- 15
Hi Everyone,
I need your advice on setting up a clever counter proposal on the following case.
Scenario:
A company approached me to do a Reverse SEO to kick a blogspot site out of Top 10 of G.
The blogpot site is sitting on 2nd place in G.
This blogspot site is spreading malicious rumours about the company being a scam.
Naturally the company wants it out of Top 10.
(I'm not dwelling into who's wrong or right)
The keyword - only 1 - is the company's name - 5 stars (very easy in Traffic Travis) and no authority sites in the Top 10 listing.
I'm proposing a package of $3,000 to ensure the blogspot site gets kick out of Top 10 and ensure no new sites with bad press will show up.
The package includes getting 15-20 new websites/blogs/web 2.0 sites with good quality content + tonnes of backlinks to push the blogspot site out of Top 10, for a period of 12 months.
They will see results in 8-12 weeks of the blogspot site being kick out of Top 10.
The client came back to me with the following offer:
1) they will confirm the deal if I can lower the fee to $2,000
2) How much refund, if in case the blogspot site got up to the Top 10 during the 12 months of the Reverse SEO campaign.
Issue:
I do not want to lower my fee just as the client pleased because it will potrayed that:
1) I'm desperate for sales more than they want to protect their reputation
2) I overcharge
3) My service has no professional value as any client can just squeeze my fee to any amount
Problem:
Whether it is $2,000 or $3,000, my work will be the same - 15-20 websites, content, backlinks, the works, etc
But the profit margin is affected that much!!
Suggestion needed:
Suggestion #1 - Counter proposal of the 2 packages
a) $2,000
- it takes longer to see results - 16 weeks or more instead of 8 weeks (i'm taking my own sweet time)
- no guarantee of other new sites with bad press; we only focus solely on that blogspot site.
- no refund? (i'm still not sure on this)
b) $3,000
- as my earlier proposal
- ensure no new or old sites with bad press appears on Top 10 (excluding news site like CNN, Wiki etc)
- refund of 10% and will get the bad press sites out in 1 month's time
Suggestion #2 - Your Constructive Suggestions Welcome.
Suggestion #3 - Your Constructive Suggestions Welcome.
Many Thanks!
P.S. Let me know also if I should post this in a more appropriate sub-forum?
I need your advice on setting up a clever counter proposal on the following case.
Scenario:
A company approached me to do a Reverse SEO to kick a blogspot site out of Top 10 of G.
The blogpot site is sitting on 2nd place in G.
This blogspot site is spreading malicious rumours about the company being a scam.
Naturally the company wants it out of Top 10.
(I'm not dwelling into who's wrong or right)
The keyword - only 1 - is the company's name - 5 stars (very easy in Traffic Travis) and no authority sites in the Top 10 listing.
I'm proposing a package of $3,000 to ensure the blogspot site gets kick out of Top 10 and ensure no new sites with bad press will show up.
The package includes getting 15-20 new websites/blogs/web 2.0 sites with good quality content + tonnes of backlinks to push the blogspot site out of Top 10, for a period of 12 months.
They will see results in 8-12 weeks of the blogspot site being kick out of Top 10.
The client came back to me with the following offer:
1) they will confirm the deal if I can lower the fee to $2,000
2) How much refund, if in case the blogspot site got up to the Top 10 during the 12 months of the Reverse SEO campaign.
Issue:
I do not want to lower my fee just as the client pleased because it will potrayed that:
1) I'm desperate for sales more than they want to protect their reputation
2) I overcharge
3) My service has no professional value as any client can just squeeze my fee to any amount
Problem:
Whether it is $2,000 or $3,000, my work will be the same - 15-20 websites, content, backlinks, the works, etc
But the profit margin is affected that much!!
Suggestion needed:
Suggestion #1 - Counter proposal of the 2 packages
a) $2,000
- it takes longer to see results - 16 weeks or more instead of 8 weeks (i'm taking my own sweet time)
- no guarantee of other new sites with bad press; we only focus solely on that blogspot site.
- no refund? (i'm still not sure on this)
b) $3,000
- as my earlier proposal
- ensure no new or old sites with bad press appears on Top 10 (excluding news site like CNN, Wiki etc)
- refund of 10% and will get the bad press sites out in 1 month's time
Suggestion #2 - Your Constructive Suggestions Welcome.
Suggestion #3 - Your Constructive Suggestions Welcome.
Many Thanks!
P.S. Let me know also if I should post this in a more appropriate sub-forum?