Is still HideClick working for you?

tsode2001

Newbie
Joined
May 23, 2018
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
I recently signed up in HideClick. I set my first campaign, I integreated with my tracking tool (https://afflift.com/f/link-directory/voluum.18/) but I had a problem to carry the campaign URL parameters to the offer page (what they call 'money page'). I submitted a ticket but I never got an answer. I also tried Telegram but it didn't work neither.

The system works. Well, more or less, but maybe it was me who didn't set up properly the campaign. I'm still investigating. However, after several days still no answer.

I already found a solution using AI. Everything works now, technically speaking.

But is HideClick still an useful tool for you, guys?
 
HideClick is still useful, the right campaign setup is what converts and what make your campaign last long is the right cloaking tools
Thank you. I appreciate it.
 
Very few cloakers can compete with HideClick presently. The challenge is always in the campaign setup. If you are able to get a good campaign running, leave the rest to HideClick. The feature that fascinates me the most is its server side routing execution which results in ultra speed delivery.
 
I recently signed up in HideClick. I set my first campaign, I integreated with my tracking tool (https://afflift.com/f/link-directory/voluum.18/) but I had a problem to carry the campaign URL parameters to the offer page (what they call 'money page'). I submitted a ticket but I never got an answer. I also tried Telegram but it didn't work neither.

The system works. Well, more or less, but maybe it was me who didn't set up properly the campaign. I'm still investigating. However, after several days still no answer.

I already found a solution using AI. Everything works now, technically speaking.

But is HideClick still an useful tool for you, guys?
It's true parameter passing between the tracker and offer page is a challenge at times. I would do the separate testing to find out where they break within the voluum log files, particularly when support takes time to respond.
 
Very few cloakers can compete with HideClick presently. The challenge is always in the campaign setup. If you are able to get a good campaign running, leave the rest to HideClick. The feature that fascinates me the most is its server side routing execution which results in ultra speed delivery.
Doubt that, completely not up to date - tool.
 
The lack of support is a bigger concern than the setup issue itself. With tracking tools, even small parameter problems can mess up attribution, so I’d test the full click-to-conversion path before trusting the campaign data.
 
The lack of support is a bigger concern than the setup issue itself. With tracking tools, even small parameter problems can mess up attribution, so I’d test the full click-to-conversion path before trusting the campaign data.

Support can cut your time to $ by a magnitude order. A cloaking project you'd get done in 10 days can be done in 1 or 2 days if you get the right answers
 
Yes JCI is the best one even if it's the most expensive one.
No, not the best - there is no best , cloaking is cat and mouse game . But these tools i mentioned is good tools , up to date with many years of experience in the cloaking business.
 
I recently signed up in HideClick. I set my first campaign, I integreated with my tracking tool (https://afflift.com/f/link-directory/voluum.18/) but I had a problem to carry the campaign URL parameters to the offer page (what they call 'money page'). I submitted a ticket but I never got an answer. I also tried Telegram but it didn't work neither.

The system works. Well, more or less, but maybe it was me who didn't set up properly the campaign. I'm still investigating. However, after several days still no answer.

I already found a solution using AI. Everything works now, technically speaking.

But is HideClick still an useful tool for you, guys?
I think that support is as crucial as feature when it comes to choosing a cloaker. even if a certain cloaker suit you well, being caught in issues with subid passing or tracking will consume much of your time. I always test the whole proces from the tracker to the lander nd offer with a small volume of traffic.
 
The lack of support is a bigger concern than the setup issue itself. With tracking tools, even small parameter problems can mess up attribution, so I’d test the full click-to-conversion path before trusting the campaign data.
Absolutely right, and I would verify that UTMs, redirects, and conversion events make the whole trip. Bad tracking may turn a good campaign into a bad one.
 
I recently signed up in HideClick. I set my first campaign, I integreated with my tracking tool (https://afflift.com/f/link-directory/voluum.18/) but I had a problem to carry the campaign URL parameters to the offer page (what they call 'money page'). I submitted a ticket but I never got an answer. I also tried Telegram but it didn't work neither.

The system works. Well, more or less, but maybe it was me who didn't set up properly the campaign. I'm still investigating. However, after several days still no answer.

I already found a solution using AI. Everything works now, technically speaking.

But is HideClick still an useful tool for you, guys?
yes, I have faced such problems with tracking to.. It always occurs in the absence of subid passing through the redirects. now, before allocating any budget, I first test some click to see whether all the parameters are being passed until the offer page nd whether the conversions are being tracked. this save me a lot of time in the future.
 
In my case, I needed to add the following scripts to carry the parameters.

The first one sets the allowed parameters to be taken. Those are just examples (param1, param2...) although for Voluum I needed to carry 'cpid', 'ced' and 'cid' parameters.


$allowed = [
'param1', 'param2', 'param3', 'cpid',
'cep', 'cid'

];


The second script takes the actual values from those allowed parameters:


foreach ($allowed as $key) {
if (isset($_GET[$key]) && is_string($_GET[$key])) {
$params[$key] = $_GET[$key];
}

}
 
Back
Top