Ever improved any article without having to rewrite it from scratch?

[jimmy.andersan]

Is it true that sometimes an article is not bad but lacks certain elements that readers look for in the search engine? Have you got any experience with improvements of an article using different approaches other than rewriting it all?

 

[SEO JOKER]

Yes, for sure. Sometimes an article is already good but just misses a few things people are actually searching for. I usually improve it by adding relevant subtopics, FAQs, examples, better internal links, and updating old information instead of rewriting the whole thing.

 

[wotova]

Yes, I have seen success by updating the missing portions rather than re-writing everything. Mostly, correcting intent, adding informative portions, enhancing internal linking and updating old information is enough.

 

[BlackShield]

Is it true that sometimes an article is not bad but lacks certain elements that readers look for in the search engine? Have you got any experience with improvements of an article using different approaches other than rewriting it all?

Yes, definitely. I’ve had better results sometimes by improving specific weak sections instead of rewriting the whole article. Adding missing information, real examples, FAQs, updated data, better headings and internal links can make a big difference when the core has sold content

 

[james.col]

Yes, I have seen success by updating the missing portions rather than re-writing everything. Mostly, correcting intent, adding informative portions, enhancing internal linking and updating old information is enough.

Yep, no need to rewrite a page that already has an established foundation. Tackling any intent gaps, updating anything that is out-of-date, and linking things internally may do the trick without a rewrite.

 

[voxeltoon]

Is it true that sometimes an article is not bad but lacks certain elements that readers look for in the search engine? Have you got any experience with improvements of an article using different approaches other than rewriting it all?

yesh i have experienced more success enhancing an already existing article than starting from scratch. the truth is that the material may be very helpful nd only requires some tweaking with respect to heading, updatting of examples, linking internally or answering questions that people are really seeking answers to.

 

[Link Building Pro]

yeah just added a comparison table and a few images to an old post once, didn't touch the writing at all and it still moved up a few spots

 

[josh.phliphi]

yeah just added a comparison table and a few images to an old post once, didn't touch the writing at all and it still moved up a few spots

Yes, there are times when just by improving the formatting, you can make that old web page better without having to write a new one from scratch. There have been instances when tables, visuals, and improved formatting have given that web page a boost up.

 

[lynxtoon]

Is it true that sometimes an article is not bad but lacks certain elements that readers look for in the search engine? Have you got any experience with improvements of an article using different approaches other than rewriting it all?

yes there have been times when it is better to edit rather than rewrite the article from scratch. in such cases, simple changes such as ressponding to simple queries nd delleting unnecessary words to add relevant examples, may turn out to be very effective.

 

[Monkey$houlder]

added a short answer paragraph at the top and a table, nothing else. it went from page 2 to top 5. the article was fine, it just made google scroll for the answer

 

[Emaya Anand]

Yes sometimes the content is fine but missing key information or search intent. Adding FAQs examples better headings internal links and updated facts can improve it without rewriting the whole article.

 

[somcer]

Is it true that sometimes an article is not bad but lacks certain elements that readers look for in the search engine? Have you got any experience with improvements of an article using different approaches other than rewriting it all?

Yeah it happens all the time with older content. sometimes the information is all right, but the article fails to mention some of the things that people want to knows about so i add those parts and some new examples to it.

 

[jimmy0]

Yes sometimes the content is fine but missing key information or search intent. Adding FAQs examples better headings internal links and updated facts can improve it without rewriting the whole article.

Yes, some times the page just requires to fill in a couple of blanks rather than rewriting the whole thing. I normally compare it with the present day’s SERP and then fill in the missing pieces.

 

[RankCatalystt]

Is it true that sometimes an article is not bad but lacks certain elements that readers look for in the search engine? Have you got any experience with improvements of an article using different approaches other than rewriting it all?

all the time. Just with the addition of a TL;DR box at the top, a great comparison table nd two significant H2 title , I can assist u to improve your click through rate and dwell time, without changing 80% of your original text.