Charles yoo
BANNED
- Jul 10, 2026
- 15
- 3
For the same one million views, one video can earn a significant amount, while another generates considerably less revenue. Why is that?
The main reason for this financial gap lies in the difference between the metrics CPM (how much the advertiser pays for 1000 impressions) and RPM (how much the author actually receives for 1000 views after deducting YouTube's share of 45%)For the same one million views, one video can earn a significant amount, while another generates considerably less revenue. Why is that?
Exactly, but I think it’s worth clarifying that RPM isn't simply CPM minus 45%. CPM is calculated based on 1,000 ad impressions, whereas RPM is based on 1,000 views and reflects the creator's actual revenue, so it also depends on the number of monetized views.The main reason for this financial gap lies in the difference between the metrics CPM (how much the advertiser pays for 1000 impressions) and RPM (how much the author actually receives for 1000 views after deducting YouTube's share of 45%)
1M YouTube views are still valuable, but revenue depends heavily on niche, audience location, watch time, and ad demand.For the same one million views, one video can earn a significant amount, while another generates considerably less revenue. Why is that?
Absolutely! 1M views can have very different earnings depending on the niche, audience, and ad demand.For the same one million views, one video can earn a significant amount, while another generates considerably less revenue. Why is that?
Retention duration and viewer region are considerable variables. Try to. compare them first and see if it makes sense that way.For the same one million views, one video can earn a significant amount, while another generates considerably less revenue. Why is that?
The more views you have, the more will engage to your cta hook in your reel- then more warm up DM leads you will get and sales. Gotcha?It depends on the topic, audience, location and watch time. A million views can have very different value from one channel to another. The number of views alone doesn’t show the full value.
Facebook and Instagram have implemented changes that limit the organic reach of Reels, making it harder for users to gain visibility without paid promotion. This decline in organic reach is part of a broader trend affecting most social media platforms, where engagement rates have significantly dropped over the years.I agree with the points regarding the funnel model, but I’m quite curious about that 8–10% figure. Is that actually a platform-wide limit, or just an average you’ve observed? I find that organic reach tends to fluctuate significantly depending on the industry and content.
I see your point, but saying that "views are just numbers" seems to downplay the matter a bit. Isn't reaching a massive audience an asset in itself—even if you can't directly track the subsequent actions of every single viewer?
You have some control, have trend USA music in the first second in your reel a USA topic and use usa-english in captions, maybe add 2-3 usa hashtags too, use the words your audiences use in your captions, then then FB+IG knows who your audience is and which country you try to reach. In Tiktok not- there you need a special setup to get into US audience.It depends on the niche and GEO of viewers. It's not actually stable.
yes the number of 1M views is just one aspect of it. the viewers location, interest niche, audience retention rate as well as the monetization percentage of these views can significantly alter the bottom line in terms of earnings. two viral videos might generate complletely different amounts of money.For the same one million views, one video can earn a significant amount, while another generates considerably less revenue. Why is that?