Is better for multiple channel residential mobile proxy or ISP proxy?

[keven11]

Hi everyone :
i want to run multiple channel with intedetector and proxy i want to know is better to use residential mobile proxy or ISP static proxy ?
and i have other question how this guru's did create alot of email's without their mac adress of their phone get banned by google

 

[TargetedProxies]

Hi everyone :
i want to run multiple channel with intedetector and proxy i want to know is better to use residential mobile proxy or ISP static proxy ?
and i have other question how this guru's did create alot of email's without their mac adress of their phone get banned by google

The pattern a lot of operators land on: use the mobile/residential IP for the riskiest moment (creation and early warming, where the platform scrutinizes new accounts hardest), then park the account on its own dedicated static ISP IP for ongoing use where speed and a consistent IP matter more than raw trust. If the platform you're targeting isn't aggressive about it, a dedicated static ISP per channel alone is often enough and much easier to run.

On the email question — Google isn't banning by your phone's MAC address. MAC addresses are local-network only; they never leave your router, so Google's servers never see them. What people are usually running into is a mix of IP reputation, device fingerprinting, and phone-number verification limits.