DR90 travel link for a SaaS site – cheap or dangerous?

cloakme

Elite Member
Jr. VIP
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
2,132
Reaction score
463
Sellers push "high DR any niche" because it's easy inventory. But Google's topic modeling gets sharper each update.

A SaaS site getting a link from "Best Caribbean Beaches 2025" looks unnatural. I'd rather pay $200 for a DR40 SaaS relevant link than $150 for DR90 irrelevant.

Has anyone here received a relevancy manual action? What was the ratio of off topic links?
 
not at all any issue what so ever, google is not that fast or accurate, just keep making other links as naked and branded to safe guard such guest post.
 
I would take a relevant DR40 link over an unrelated DR90 any day. A link that fits the site's niche looks more natural and is usually more valuable in the long run. Relevance has become much more important than chasing high metrics alone.
 
Sellers push "high DR any niche" because it's easy inventory. But Google's topic modeling gets sharper each update.

A SaaS site getting a link from "Best Caribbean Beaches 2025" looks unnatural. I'd rather pay $200 for a DR40 SaaS relevant link than $150 for DR90 irrelevant.

Has anyone here received a relevancy manual action? What was the ratio of off topic links?
The DR score don't mean shit if the link would not pass authority.

But for a very low price, I can take links from a high metric site that has strong history of ranking on Google.
 
i'm with you on this. relevance has become way more important than chasing big DR numbers. i'd take a relevant DR40 link over an unrelated DR90 every time. those links tend to make more sense both for users and search engines. i haven't seen a manual action based purely on off topic links, but i've definitely seen sites struggle after building too many irrelevant ones.
my opinion, a natural, relevant link profile beats impressive metrics every day.
 
I would definitely avoid it because a complete lack of niche relevance is a huge footprint these days. Google's topical authority systems are smart enough to look past high vanity metrics like DR90 if the context doesn't match your SaaS. A highly relevant DR40 link will always pass better contextual value and keep your link profile safe in the long run. :cool:
 
Has anyone here received a relevancy manual action?
Asking for a ratio is the right instinct and the non-answer tells you everything: there is no "relevancy" entry in GSC's manual actions report. Never has been. Off-topic links don't get you punished, they get you ignored. Penguin 4.0 flipped that switch back in 2016 -> irrelevant and spammy links get devalued, not penalized. The unnatural links action still exists, but it fires on engineered patterns (anchor stuffing, link scheme footprints), not on one beach listicle pointing at your SaaS.

So the DR90 travel link isn't dangerous. It's worse, it's probably worthless. A "Best Caribbean Beaches" page selling placements to SaaS brands is also selling them to casinos, CBD and essay mills. That outbound pattern is what Google actually reads, and once a page looks like a link store its links stop passing anything. $150 for a devalued vote.

Your DR40 SaaS link wins, but not because 40 beats 90 or because relevance is magic. It wins because a page that only links where it makes editorial sense keeps passing value. Relevance is the visible half of that; the seller's customer list is the invisible half.
 
I'd pay even more for a relevant link which passes link juice, then a high DR link on a non-relevant website.

Relevance is much better and beats any high "DR" link.
 
I agree. Topical relevance has been more valuable than DR alone. I'd take a relevant DR40 link over an unrelated DR90 link any day.
 
Back
Top