Why do I keep getting flagged for multi-account abuse when running Google Ads for slots in Brazil? Any advice, guys?

[lidaxi]

Why do I keep getting flagged for multi-account abuse when running Brazilian slot ads? The same ad account runs other ads without any issues and spends consistently, but whenever I run slot ads, I always get flagged for multi-account abuse. Is there a setting I missed? If anyone knows the answer, please give me some advice. Thanks.

 

[ClickProfitHub]

slots in brazil is super high risk right now bro. google is flagging it heavy cuz u probably dont have the official google gambling certification for brazil. when the AI sees slot keywords or landing pages on a normal account, it instantly flags it as multi-account abuse cuz it thinks u r trying to bypass their casino policy. u either need proper certificates or look into cloaking if u r doing blackhat stuff.

 

[lidaxi]

Its because slot ads trigger a much deeper automated review than your normal campaigns. had this exact issue last year running tiger games in br... the normal ads run fine because they go through basic automated checks, but the moment you launch gambling, the system digs into your footprint. if your payment BIN, domain registrar, or browser profile is linked to any past bans, you get hit with the multi-account flag instantly. honestly you need to use a proper antidetect, clean mobile proxies, and a completely separate payment method. are you using a cloaker? running slots direct without one is basically suicide anyway.

Thank you very much for your response. We’ve been using masking tools for our campaigns, but we’re still getting flagged for account abuse. We’ve also tried using separate payment methods and separate identity verification, but the result is the same—multiple-account abuse. The only silver lining is that the risk control issues related to multiple-account abuse are concentrated on accounts under a specific MCC; there are some MCCs where this doesn’t happen. I’m not sure how long this will last, but I suspect that once spending reaches $250, we’ll likely face this multi-account violation again. So right now, I’m not sure how to resolve it. How did you handle this issue? Thank you.

 

[lidaxi]

slots in brazil is super high risk right now bro. google is flagging it heavy cuz u probably dont have the official google gambling certification for brazil. when the AI sees slot keywords or landing pages on a normal account, it instantly flags it as multi-account abuse cuz it thinks u r trying to bypass their casino policy. u either need proper certificates or look into cloaking if u r doing blackhat stuff.

Thank you for your response. We’ve already implemented obfuscation techniques, but our activity is still being detected. Accounts are being suspended under an MCC manager account—it seems my ad conversion package has been flagged by Google’s system. How did you resolve this? Thank you.

 

[Good_Agency_Ads]

Are you using different IP addresses and email addresses? When running with this type of niche, extra care must be taken regarding account association.

 

[lidaxi]

Are you using different IP addresses and email addresses? When running with this type of niche, extra care must be taken regarding account association.

Yes, I’m using different IP addresses and Google email accounts, and the ID documents for each account are different. This has nothing to do with the accounts themselves; it’s an issue with the ads. When I run ads under the same conditions across all my accounts, running other types of ads doesn’t trigger a “multiple-account abuse” warning, but running slot ads does.

 

[SMM Junction]

If its only happening on that specific MCC then the manager account itself is flagged. Google links everything under a dirty MCC once a high risk campaign triggers their manual review... you are basically burning every new account you put in there. Also you mentioned the conversion package being flagged. If you are sharing the same tracking link, pixel, or app ID across those accounts they will link them instantly no matter how clean your IPs are. Had a similar issue last year with utility apps. We had to completely isolate the tracking setup for each account and ditch the main MCC to get around it.

 

[The WP Nerd]

yeah if you are sharing the same gtm, firebase, or even just the same conversion postback url, they will link them instantly. google is super aggressive with those initial threshold reviews now, especially around the 250 mark. honestly, running slots on an MCC is just asking for a chain ban. you need to isolate everything... individual accounts only, different domain registrars, and separate conversion setups. also might want to check if your cloaker is leaking the real user agent during the conversion event. sometimes the bot sneaks in right when the pixel triggers and flags the whole setup.

 

[lidaxi]

If its only happening on that specific MCC then the manager account itself is flagged. Google links everything under a dirty MCC once a high risk campaign triggers their manual review... you are basically burning every new account you put in there. Also you mentioned the conversion package being flagged. If you are sharing the same tracking link, pixel, or app ID across those accounts they will link them instantly no matter how clean your IPs are. Had a similar issue last year with utility apps. We had to completely isolate the tracking setup for each account and ditch the main MCC to get around it.

Thank you so much for your answer. It was a huge help to me. I really appreciate it.

 

[lidaxi]

yeah if you are sharing the same gtm, firebase, or even just the same conversion postback url, they will link them instantly. google is super aggressive with those initial threshold reviews now, especially around the 250 mark. honestly, running slots on an MCC is just asking for a chain ban. you need to isolate everything... individual accounts only, different domain registrars, and separate conversion setups. also might want to check if your cloaker is leaking the real user agent during the conversion event. sometimes the bot sneaks in right when the pixel triggers and flags the whole setup.

Thank you so much for your answer. It was a huge help to me. I really appreciate it.

 

[lidaxi]

hello, Slot ads are usually subject to much stricter scrutiny than other ad categories because they are considered high-risk. Even if your account is compliant and performs well with other campaigns, the platform may apply additional checks to gambling-related ads and mistakenly associate certain signals with multi-account abuse. I’d recommend reviewing the platform’s gambling advertising policies, checking for any shared IPs, devices, payment methods, or business assets linked to other accounts, and contacting support for clarification if everything appears compliant....

Thank you so much for your answer. It was a huge help to me. I really appreciate it.

 

[Papa Mexicana]

If it only happens with one niche, it’s probably not just a setting issue. Some verticals like gambling get much heavier review and risk checks, so things like account history, landing page, payment info, creatives, and compliance signals can matter more than the ad account itself. I’d check the platform’s policy requirements first rather than assuming it’s a technical setup problem.

Why do I keep getting flagged for multi-account abuse when running Brazilian slot ads? The same ad account runs other ads without any issues and spends consistently, but whenever I run slot ads, I always get flagged for multi-account abuse. Is there a setting I missed? If anyone knows the answer, please give me some advice. Thanks.View attachment 528511