Running 300 accounts on the same mobile proxy

lissaaa

Registered Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2025
Messages
82
Reaction score
25
Hey yall,

we currently switched our Meta accounts from ISP to mobile proxys. My question is if you can leave 300 accounts on the same mobile plan. So same sim and same subnet. Wont that link them effortlessly after a while? Or are the subnets really that big?
 
In my experience, having 300 accounts sharing a single SIM/proxy/subnet is very risky and there's no way to guarantee they won't be linked by Meta. The more accounts that share the same infrastructure, the more suspicious the signal becomes. The safer approach is to use accounts specific to each business, manage them through an official BM and adhere to policies.
 
don't.
 
I'd assume the role of a mobile proxy is to create for each account his own proxy device / identity.

So this would beat the purpose of using a proxy in the first place.
 
I'd assume the role of a mobile proxy is to create for each account his own proxy device / identity.

So this would beat the purpose of using a proxy in the first place.
I need to add that the IPs rotate ofc. So each account is gonna always be on a different IP
 
I think insta will ban all the account if they found them on the same IP. so don't do this, use different unqiue IPs
 
Hey yall,

we currently switched our Meta accounts from ISP to mobile proxys. My question is if you can leave 300 accounts on the same mobile plan. So same sim and same subnet. Wont that link them effortlessly after a while? Or are the subnets really that big?
that is very bad idea. You can run 1-3 account in one run and need to switch proxy
 
rotating IPs helps but it's not the main issue tbh. meta correlates accounts through a bunch of signals beyond IP device fingerprint (Android ID, GAID, hardware build props), WiFi SSID/BSSID, SIM operator, even boot timestamp. if 300 accounts run through the same physical device or same app instance, they share most of those signals and IG links them regardless of how often the IP rotates

realistic ceiling on a single mobile proxy with proper rotation is more like 3-5 accounts if the device fingerprints are isolated. if you're cloning apps you need each clone to have its own randomized Android ID, GAID, and Build.* values at minimum. otherwise IP diversity is just noise on top of a flagged device cluster
 
Last edited:
I think insta will ban all the account if they found them on the same IP. so don't do this, use different unqiue IPs
Like i said its different ips each account. its the same mobile plan tho
rotating IPs helps but it's not the main issue tbh. meta correlates accounts through a bunch of signals beyond IP — device fingerprint (Android ID, GAID, hardware build props), WiFi SSID/BSSID, SIM operator, even boot timestamp. if 300 accounts run through the same physical device or same app instance, they share most of those signals and IG links them regardless of how often the IP rotates.

realistic ceiling on a single mobile proxy with proper rotation is more like 3-5 accounts if the device fingerprints are isolated. if you're cloning apps you need each clone to have its own randomized Android ID, GAID, and Build.* values at minimum. otherwise IP diversity is just noise on top of a flagged device cluster.
It´s all IOS phones. We have a similar container system to crane so thats not really a problem. Im pretty sure its the IPs but i thought that subnets for mobiles are so big that its almost unlinkable
 
You can use a 4G proxy with a rotation link and run the profiles like that. Just make sure you are rotating the IP; this way all the accounts will use different IP's time to time.
 
Hey yall,

we currently switched our Meta accounts from ISP to mobile proxys. My question is if you can leave 300 accounts on the same mobile plan. So same sim and same subnet. Wont that link them effortlessly after a while? Or are the subnets really that big?
Running 300 different accounts from the same proxy carries the risk of all of them getting banned or shadow banned. Also Instagram can detect your IP so I suggest buying 4G mobile proxies coupled with anti detect browsers and group 3 accounts per proxy if you want your accounts to survive.
 
Technically, you can pull it off. If you've already dealt with the iOS fingerprinting side (Crane alone doesn't perform magic; there's other data that leaks from your device that Crane doesn't spoof) and you're rotating the IP every time you switch accounts, it works.

But honestly, the risk isn't just the IP. If your proxy is in a low-density region, you’re basically building a massive cluster. 300 accounts doing the same shit, at the same hours, on the same carrier and location is a huge red flag for Meta’s telemetry. IP diversity is just one layer; your behavioral patterns and how deep your fingerprint spoofing goes are way more important. If you don't vary the activity, you're just handing them a cluster to nuked all at once.
 
Hey yall,

we currently switched our Meta accounts from ISP to mobile proxys. My question is if you can leave 300 accounts on the same mobile plan. So same sim and same subnet. Wont that link them effortlessly after a while? Or are the subnets really that big?
You can stack a ton of accounts on one mobile IP because CGNAT makes it look like a whole apartment building of real users, not a bot farm. Just make sure each account has its own unique fingerprint in Gologin so their behavior doesn't accidentally link them together.
 
I agree with the sentiment That 300 is excessive. I've seen people actually successfully push around ten accounts on one mobile proxy, but they were all different devices and very different humanised behaviour patterns.
 
You should use 3-4 accounts on 1 IP, max 10.

Each with a different fingerprint.

Your assumption is that you are getting a rotating proxy, but that rotation would be, say, every 5 minutes. And for that whole 5 minutes, the IP will be the same.

Even when running 3-4 accounts, you have to run them at different time intervals, just to be on the safer side.
 
Seeing two 'Banned' tags in one sub-thread about safety is the ultimate irony. The point about infrastructure is valid, but everyone misses the fingerprinting issue. Meta doesn't just track IPs; they track behavioral patterns and browser canvas data. If you’re managing assets for high-ticket clients, 'playing safe' with a BM is only 20% of the job. The real question is how you warm up those entities to look like legitimate businesses, not just another farm.
 
Back
Top