Why am i getting banned so fast even with cloaker?

[Raspberries]

I am using a cloaker for my PPC ads, but my accounts are still getting banned in just 2 days i think the cloaker is not working properly and platform is seeing my real page. Dooes anyone know better cloaker that actually works and hides the page form reviewers?
Thanks!

 

[BlackEclipse]

Yout cloaker is not blocking properly. If the platform reviewers see you real site, they will ban you fast.
What are you selling?

 

[kalur]

Either the cloaker is misfigured or the creatives are too black

 

[ads studio]

We cant be sure about what is going on until we know what you are selling and you might want to step back and review your overall setup (ad copy, domain history, page consistency, etc.)

 

[johnatanmark]

Hi Ads Studio

Please follow rols

 

[ChaosClicks]

I had this problem last month. i used a cheap tool and lost many accounts. it is not just about the tool. the list of bad IPs must be very good

 

[Proxy Cake]

Without full details of your setup it's hard to advise you where the hole is

 

[jokalo]

I am using a cloaker for my PPC ads, but my accounts are still getting banned in just 2 days i think the cloaker is not working properly and platform is seeing my real page. Dooes anyone know better cloaker that actually works and hides the page form reviewers?
Thanks!

Which cloaker you are using ?

 

[bubblehat]

i tried many tools now i am using TrafficGuardian and it is very stable. it filters out unwanted traffic and reviewers better than others. in this work, the price does not matter as much the setup quality.

 

[ThrowRaPest]

it’s less about the cloaker and more about overall setup - domain history, ad copy, landing page signals, all that. Maybe it`s just bad cloaker

 

[Raspberries]

Yout cloaker is not blocking properly. If the platform reviewers see you real site, they will ban you fast.
What are you selling?

I am selling health products. I think you are right, the reviewers are seeing my real page. I need a better way to block this unwanted traffic. Any suggestions for a better tool or setup?

Either the cloaker is misfigured or the creatives are too black

I think my creatives are fine because they are not very aggressive . I feel the problem is the cloaker setup. How do i know if it misconfigured? I just want to block all unwanted visitors properly.

I had this problem last month. i used a cheap tool and lost many accounts. it is not just about the tool. the list of bad IPs must be very good

Yes agree. I think my current tool has a very old list and it is not catching the new reviewer IPs, Which tool are you using that has a better IP list.

 

[Raspberries]

Without full details of your setup it's hard to advise you where the hole is

I understand. iam just a beginner and trying to learn. I strongly feel the hole is in the filtering because my ads get approved but then account gets banned very fast. I need a setup that is more solid.

Which cloaker you are using ?

Peer Click

i tried many tools now i am using TrafficGuardian and it is very stable. it filters out unwanted traffic and reviewers better than others. in this work, the price does not matter as much the setup quality.

I haven't heard much about TrafficGuardian is it easy for a begginner like me?
I reeally want something that can handle the health niche without getting me banned in 2 days.

it’s less about the cloaker and more about overall setup - domain history, ad copy, landing page signals, all that. Maybe it`s just bad cloaker

True setup is key that why i'm looking for a more solid filtering setup now.

 

[Slightly Confused]

Honestly it doesn’t look like a cloaker issue. Most of the time it’s account quality, fingerprint and overall behavior. If the account is already weak or not warmed up properly, bans will happen fast no matter what tool you use. Seen similar cases where fixing setup made a big difference.

 

[kalur]

Peer Click - I think thats the issue. It seems more like a filtering, tracker - so it doesnt actually function as a proper cloaker.
It probably cloaks bots, but human reviews etc not so much

Get a actual cloaker specifically designed for this.

 

[Shadow Forge]

It doesn’t seem like a cloaking issue. Most of the time, it comes down to account quality, fingerprint, and behavior. If the account isn’t strong or properly warmed up, bans will happen quickly regardless of the tool used.

 

[woggle]

I haven't heard much about TrafficGuardian is it easy for a begginner like me?

I've recently started using TrafficGuardian as well, and so far, it's working fine for me. if you're beginner, my advice would be to first understand the basic of how cloaking actually works. Go though their blogs and docs because that's really important.
A tool is only as good as your understanding of the setup.

 

[TRICKY SEO]

I can’t help write or promote copy around cloaking or bypassing ad review systems.

If your ads keep getting flagged, the safer route is to fix the root cause: make your landing page and ad match policy, avoid misleading redirects, and keep the funnel fully transparent. Platforms are pretty aggressive about this now, and anything “hidden from reviewers” usually gets caught sooner or later.

If you want, tell me what niche you’re running and I can help you make a compliant version that actually survives review and scales longer than 2 days.

 

[AdsPowerTeam]

It's probably not your cloaker. If you're getting banned in 1–2 days, your setup is leaking signals somewhere (IP, fingerprint, domain, etc). Even the best cloaker won't save a weak environment.

 

[PrimeSeo01]

Upgrade to Adspect or TrafficGuardian for better detection, but ensure your Safe Page looks like a real authority site and use a Stealth Browser to hide your hardware footprint.

 

[tanjareen]

PeerClick is a tracker/filter, not a cloaker. You’ll need to upgrade to a tool that can actually do cloaking. Try JCI or Adspect if you have a large budget, or just use Cloakify , it’s one of the best low-cost options. I’m currently using it.