• Please take a moment to look over the Suggestions & Feedback rules before making a post: READ RULES HERE

A warning message on BSTs, WTB, HAF threads about using Telegram.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rufai

Supreme Member
Joined
May 23, 2020
Messages
1,362
Reaction score
1,177
I think a warning message on BSTs, WTBs, HAF threads warning buyers about using Telegram and advising using alternative methods will go a long way in protecting buyers.

For example, Bybit does this on their P2P section where they display a popup message warning users that users of a certain bank can delete bank account records. Therefore resolving related issues may take time and advises users to consider alternative method.
 
I think a warning message on BSTs, WTBs, HAF threads warning buyers about using Telegram and advising using alternative methods will go a long way in protecting buyers.

For example, Bybit does this on their P2P section where they display a popup message warning users that users of a certain bank can delete bank account records. Therefore resolving related issues may take time and advises users to consider alternative method.
Do you really think that a different communication platform can prevent fraud? I don't think so.

Ultimately, the criminal energy is on both sides. The buyer who wants to bypass the actual providers (AWS, Meta, Google, PP, Stripe) and actively seeks opportunities, as well as the supposed seller who disappears with the money in hand. No one will take criminal action because of this.

Other communication channels and dispute threads do not change this.
 
Do you really think that a different communication platform can prevent fraud? I don't think so.

Ultimately, the criminal energy is on both sides. The buyer who wants to bypass the actual providers (AWS, Meta, Google, PP, Stripe) and actively seeks opportunities, as well as the supposed seller who disappears with the money in hand. No one will take criminal action because of this.

Other communication channels and dispute threads do not change this.
At least the buyer will be aware of the risk.
 
Do you really think that a different communication platform can prevent fraud? I don't think so.

Ultimately, the criminal energy is on both sides. The buyer who wants to bypass the actual providers (AWS, Meta, Google, PP, Stripe) and actively seeks opportunities, as well as the supposed seller who disappears with the money in hand. No one will take criminal action because of this.

Other communication channels and dispute threads do not change this.
"Criminal energy is on both sides"....well one side is doing actions against a platforms TOS for example Google...and the other side is straight up scamming. So I wouldn't say it's on both sides in most cases. That's why it's called blackhat, it's not really illegal just morally not so nice...scamming people is illegal.
 
"Criminal energy is on both sides"....well one side is doing actions against a platforms TOS for example Google...and the other side is straight up scamming. So I wouldn't say it's on both sides in most cases. That's why it's called blackhat, it's not really illegal just morally not so nice...scamming people is illegal.
Scamming companies and investors is fine? There are people behind, too.
 
Discussions about Telegram and the use of external contact information are ongoing within the team. If we decide to change the rules relating to this then we'll obviously inform the community in advance.



If you have further questions please visit our newbie guide summary here: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/s...ter-list-of-all-newbie-guide-threads.1389081/

If that doesn’t answer your question, please reach out to our Support for further guidance.

Answer Supplied - Thread Closed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top