I figured out how most SMM panels work.

[MoonCakeV5]

As we all know, the majority of SMM panels offer the exact same services and some at very similar prices. At first, it seems like they have some sort of access to massive farms or private networks, but the reality is actually much simpler.

Most of these panels are not sourcing services from farms at all, but rather from "Follow for Follow" or "Like for Like" apps. These apps are built around reward systems where real users complete actions like following accounts, liking posts for credits. A perfect example is Topfollow (Which I have tested it on a SMM panel, and turned out followers came from that app). Most of the times they either own the apps or simply give a cut to the providers. Topfollow for example is one of the biggest providers as they got around ~150,000 daily users (which half of them have 5-10 accounts in the app).

So in short, what they do is allow users to follow and like each other in exchange for followers and within that system they mix in SMM orders, where paid orders are given priority over regular users.

Honestly, this is really smart of them. This doesn't really have a any of a cost for the providers which means its highly profitable. Personally, all this time I thought it was a big phone farm, but no. Honestly wild.

 

[egyfollow]

true, but the process is very hard as you need to know if the user won't unfollow or people do scam to get points, maybe also how to make the bot run for making follow and like auto, not manually

 

[theusualkeysersoze]

That's not the full story, though.

That's, let's call it layer 3.

Layer 1 are bots, layer 2 are hybrid device farms.

Layer 4 are compromised machines.

Give or take.

L3 is indeed the most economical once it gains traction

 

[MoonCakeV5]

true, but the process is very hard as you need to know if the user won't unfollow or people do scam to get points, maybe also how to make the bot run for making follow and like auto, not manually

That's why they provide no refill and refill options. If you choose no refill and you lose followers then its not their problem.

 

[MoonCakeV5]

That's not the full story, though.

That's, let's call it layer 3.

Layer 1 are bots, layer 2 are hybrid device farms.

Layer 4 are compromised machines.

Give or take.

L3 is indeed the most economical once it gains traction

Well, yes. That's why I put "most" in the title. From what I have seen majority operate with what I mentioned as it's cheaper.

 

[omi3oh1]

SMM panels mostly get followers and likes from real people using reward apps, not big farms, which makes their system smart and low-cost.

 

[Yoram]

That's not the full story, though.

That's, let's call it layer 3.

Layer 1 are bots, layer 2 are hybrid device farms.

Layer 4 are compromised machines.

Give or take.

L3 is indeed the most economical once it gains traction

This is a better explaination for the origin of smm panel services.

Not every account is real, even the term real is used for real-looking accounts in SMM panels

 

[Isabellaura]

Yeah, most SMM panels just use apps where users follow each other for credits, not huge farms. Paid orders get priority, so it looks big but its really just clever incentives.

 

[betsuga]

Most follow then unfollow later

 

[Proxellor]

I was actually researching SMM services earlier, and your post made me stop and rethink everything.

This is probably the most educational explanation I’ve read on here today, and it honestly makes a lot of sense when you break it down like that. I always assumed it was massive phone farms too, not reward-based app ecosystems prioritising paid orders.

Really appreciate you sharing that insight, definitely changed my perspective.

 

[SparkWeb]

SMM Panel sending followers , likes , comments from farming accounts it similar to bot accounts only . quality depends on the SMM Panel providers .