YOUTUBE FARM PROFITABLE ?

[ELEKID]

Good morning dear members, I plan to start YouTube farming with an anti-detect browser or bot. I would like to have a share of the experiences of people who have already done YouTube farm. I mean use their own YouTube pool accounts to generate engagement (views, likes, etc.) with their monetized channels. Was it profitable ? If yes, I would like to know the details of how you proceeded (the number of accounts, the cost of the proxy, the number of channels where the traffic was redirected, etc.)? Thank you

 

[AhmedSaeed133]

Good morning dear members, I plan to start YouTube farming with an anti-detect browser or bot. I would like to have a share of the experiences of people who have already done YouTube farm. I mean use their own YouTube pool accounts to generate engagement (views, likes, etc.) with their monetized channels. Was it profitable ? If yes, I would like to know the details of how you proceeded (the number of accounts, the cost of the proxy, the number of channels where the traffic was redirected, etc.)? Thank you

That's good question but in my pov in any time youtube detect the proxy and shadowban the account and they also check the related account doing the same So, the good way is start on channel with low budget and grow them with loyal audience then drive you audience to your other channels easily without and ban or shadow ban.

 

[ELEKID]

That's good question but in my pov in any time youtube detect the proxy and shadowban the account and they also check the related account doing the same So, the good way is start on channel with low budget and grow them with loyal audience then drive you audience to your other channels easily without and ban or shadow ban.

Yes I was talking firstly for old channels which have already organic audience to mask them and avoid ban. My problem is to know, given the cost of what is needed (residential ip, aged account, ...other tricks to not be detected) and the amount of revenue generated. will the balance of the result be positive and therefore profitable?

Now for the new channels, can it help to build a based audience without get detected to help the algo to bring organic views ? Because nowadays build a youtube is difficult, it takes time and strategy. I took 5 years before bringing my channel to 35k subscribers posting regularly and in those past years when i begun competition was low in my niches. Nowadays there are more competitors and it is easy to create content with AI, so competition is more and more higher. Creating a channel with 0 subscribers and 0 views can take a long time for the algorithm to push it. So can farming be a primer that show that there's engagement to the algo, which will recommend more and more the content to other people ?

 

[whenzy1929]

in my personal experience it work by using android emulator

 

[BLGProductions]

Good morning dear members, I plan to start YouTube farming with an anti-detect browser or bot. I would like to have a share of the experiences of people who have already done YouTube farm. I mean use their own YouTube pool accounts to generate engagement (views, likes, etc.) with their monetized channels. Was it profitable ? If yes, I would like to know the details of how you proceeded (the number of accounts, the cost of the proxy, the number of channels where the traffic was redirected, etc.)? Thank you

Hey,

This is going to take up a lot of cost and effort from your side and its already tracked down by youtube for the most part. Why not go for some good quality smm services, cheaper and easier and can be effective if used right from a reliable panel.

 

[ELEKID]

Hey,

This is going to take up a lot of cost and effort from your side and its already tracked down by youtube for the most part. Why not go for some good quality smm services, cheaper and easier and can be effective if used right from a reliable panel.

tested smm since 3 years and there are crap

 

[BigFirePanda]

It used to be but not anymore.

 

[Adcanyon]

Good morning dear members, I plan to start YouTube farming with an anti-detect browser or bot. I would like to have a share of the experiences of people who have already done YouTube farm. I mean use their own YouTube pool accounts to generate engagement (views, likes, etc.) with their monetized channels. Was it profitable ? If yes, I would like to know the details of how you proceeded (the number of accounts, the cost of the proxy, the number of channels where the traffic was redirected, etc.)? Thank you

Good morning yes YouTube farming with your own pool of accounts can be profitable but only if done carefully Most people fail because of bad proxies poor fingerprinting or overuse of the same IPs. From my experience the key is realism You need aged accounts warm activity and slow natural patterns Most setups use at least 100 to 500 accounts with 4G or residential proxies rotating every few minutes Costs can run from 200 to 500 dollars a month just for proxies

Only a few monetized channels should receive traffic at once otherwise it looks unnatural Engagement like watch time comments and likes need to be mixed in not just views. It can work but the setup takes time and profit only comes if you stay under the radar and know how to rotate and control behavior well

 

[ELEKID]

Good morning yes YouTube farming with your own pool of accounts can be profitable but only if done carefully Most people fail because of bad proxies poor fingerprinting or overuse of the same IPs. From my experience the key is realism You need aged accounts warm activity and slow natural patterns Most setups use at least 100 to 500 accounts with 4G or residential proxies rotating every few minutes Costs can run from 200 to 500 dollars a month just for proxies

Only a few monetized channels should receive traffic at once otherwise it looks unnatural Engagement like watch time comments and likes need to be mixed in not just views. It can work but the setup takes time and profit only comes if you stay under the radar and know how to rotate and control behavior well

Thank you I'm wondering how to be profitable with a 200 usd just for proxies

 

[ELEKID]

Hey, thanks for sharing your journey — it’s a common experience with YouTube Shorts. While Shorts can get a lot of views, the RPM is very low, so even millions of views won’t bring in much income. That’s why your earnings feel underwhelming despite high views.


Joining an MCN probably won’t help unless they offer direct value like sponsorships or advanced promotion. Most take a cut of your revenue without boosting it meaningfully.


If you’re thinking of selling the channel, it has value since it’s monetized, but unless you have a loyal audience or long-form content, it may only be worth a few hundred dollars.


Before selling, consider trying trending topics. AI-related content is hot right now — even AI-generated videos draw attention. Also, use seeding tools or manually share your videos in relevant groups or communities (Facebook, Reddit, Discord) right after uploading. This boosts early traction and helps trigger the algorithm.


Since you’ve already reached monetization (which is hard), give it one more shot with a smarter content and sharing strategy before deciding to quit or sell. The channel still has potential if you shift your approach.


Good luck!

Thank you I already launch some ai channels now I need to work on them

 

[ELEKID]

If you are run for 200 acc. You need 200 accounts. 200 Mobile Proxy 1$/1 per. = 200 $ (at least)

yes but how to be profitable with it ?

 

[Trakel]

Just copped a farm of 20 devices too, and yeah, it’s mad hard to find info on this stuff. I’ll stay tuned for any updates.

 

[DustyBawls]

Well the SMM Panels are currently not working with Youtube: Subs/Views are all removed after 2-3 days.

So at the moment, farms won't work.

 

[ELEKID]

Well the SMM Panels are currently not working with Youtube: Subs/Views are all removed after 2-3 days.

So at the moment, farms won't work.

smm panels use bot farm are using gmail account and proxy the problem it is how to scale it up to make it up to make it profitable since automation and good proxies are expensive

 

[kkkingcrimson]

in my personal experience it work by using android emulator

BlueStacks or NoxPLayer? or soemthing else?

 

[mtomcreative]

Good morning dear members, I plan to start YouTube farming with an anti-detect browser or bot. I would like to have a share of the experiences of people who have already done YouTube farm. I mean use their own YouTube pool accounts to generate engagement (views, likes, etc.) with their monetized channels. Was it profitable ? If yes, I would like to know the details of how you proceeded (the number of accounts, the cost of the proxy, the number of channels where the traffic was redirected, etc.)? Thank you

I have recently started mine with about 20 old gmails (will add more as i progress), i got a mobile proxy subscription of around 100$ monthly (rotating IPs), fingerprint sub of 20$/m and currently warming up the accounts. The idead is to use this to push some of the new channels I created. I think this could be profitable on the long run if you have about 10 channels you are pushing at the same time, knowing that you are maximising resources.

At least, this is better than most SMM panels out there.

I will be following this thread to hear from experts.

 

[Tribulations]

I have recently started mine with about 20 old gmails (will add more as i progress), i got a mobile proxy subscription of around 100$ monthly (rotating IPs), fingerprint sub of 20$/m and currently warming up the accounts. The idead is to use this to push some of the new channels I created. I think this could be profitable on the long run if you have about 10 channels you are pushing at the same time, knowing that you are maximising resources.

At least, this is better than most SMM panels out there.

I will be following this thread to hear from experts.

For such an small amount why bother with some proxy that could risk the accounts? I think dynamic ip's are safer. Just find an ISP with dynamic IP and suffle. You are using 20 not 2000.

 

[mtomcreative]

For such an small amount why bother with some proxy that could risk the accounts? I think dynamic ip's are safer. Just find an ISP with dynamic IP and suffle. You are using 20 not 2000.

Thank you for your input. I have currently increased my gmails accounts to 200. I plan to get it to 1,000 by the end of this month. Do i still use dynamic IPs or stick with mobile proxies? I'd love to hear what you think. Cheers

 

[venf]

YouTube farm require using automation bot to run the profiles to secure from getting suspend with running of mass integration on target channel.

 

[Tribulations]

Thank you for your input. I have currently increased my gmails accounts to 200. I plan to get it to 1,000 by the end of this month. Do i still use dynamic IPs or stick with mobile proxies? I'd love to hear what you think. Cheers

That is a ton. How do you even plan to use 1000 accounts? There's not enough time on the day to warm up 1000 accounts, manage them, click around, etc, etc, its a mess. Im not sure about proxies, I think all proxies will eventually flag your accounts, since it's a matter of time they end up blacklisted due someone doing something with them.