Facebook nutra

Status
Not open for further replies.

Needsome

BANNED
Joined
Dec 27, 2023
Messages
31
Reaction score
11
Hey, I'm Need!
For over 6 years, I’ve been rocking the traffic arbitrage game, specializing in Facebook and pouring traffic into nutra offers. I work through cloaking and partner with top CPA and CC networks, building solid relationships. I handle multiple GEOs: Europe, LATAM, USA, and Canada, testing tons of landing pages and creatives. Always on the hunt for new opportunities and ready to share my expertise!
Let’s talk about scaling profits!
What’s your take: COD or SS? What’s the minimum KPI a buyer should hit? And how can I help you out?

Ask your questions
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-08-03 at 00.38.49.png
    Screenshot 2025-08-03 at 00.38.49.png
    405.3 KB · Views: 175
Mostly KPI depends on the vertical, GEO, and payout model. For example, in Brazil COD nutra, even a 30% RTS is okay if volume is big and CPA is low.
 
The lower the minimum KPI the buyer can achieve the better, my clients usually like that
 
Welcome Need! Curious what KPI range you usually look for before scaling and which GEOs are giving you the best consistency lately.
 
With high traffic volumes and the goal of maximizing margins, COD is still a safe bet in emerging markets to reduce the risk of returns. SS should only be used if the funnel is well optimized and the buyer guarantees the speed of processing. Minimum KPIs should be around $1+ EPC to maintain sustainable performance, especially if pushing from paid sources. Recently, some simple prelanders, reducing the element of doubt, have outperformed more complex models — worth retesting.
 
Hey, I'm Need!
For over 6 years, I’ve been rocking the traffic arbitrage game, specializing in Facebook and pouring traffic into nutra offers. I work through cloaking and partner with top CPA and CC networks, building solid relationships. I handle multiple GEOs: Europe, LATAM, USA, and Canada, testing tons of landing pages and creatives. Always on the hunt for new opportunities and ready to share my expertise!
Let’s talk about scaling profits!
What’s your take: COD or SS? What’s the minimum KPI a buyer should hit? And how can I help you out?

Ask your questions
Great to hear about your rich experience in the field of traffic discrepancy! In my opinion COD is suitable for markets where consumers do not trust online payments. However, the risk can be higher as return rates can increase. SS is suitable for campaigns with a clear and automated checkout process. This can help optimize costs and speed up transactions. Typically, the minimum KPI should be 2-5%, but this can vary depending on the industry and target audience. CPA should be monitored to ensure that budget is not exceeded and profits are maintained. AOV should be optimized to increase profit per transaction.
 
Respect for putting in the work over 6 years—sounds like you've got solid systems in place. We’ve been testing both SS and COD flows recently. COD gives better short-term scale, but SS shows stronger LTV when done right.
 
Six years is no joke, respect. My take, based on the trenches:

COD vs. SS: In Brazil, COD is still the winner for nutra—more volume and better scaling potential because of local payment preferences. In the USA, SS is king. The market is mature, and you get better long-term customer value.

Minimum KPI: I always aim for at least a $1 EPC. If your cold traffic isn't hitting that, it's not ready to scale. It's the ultimate pulse check, no matter the GEO.
 
Between COD and SS, COD is safer for testing in low-trust markets but comes with higher return rates, while SS offers better margins and cash flow if your funnel is solid. A good buyer should aim for at least 1.5% CTR, sub-$1 CPC, and 2x+ ROAS before scaling.
 
Impressive for nutra, COD often works best in emerging GEOs with lower trust in online payments, while SS can scale well in Tier 1 markets. Minimum KPI depends on payout, but I’d aim for at least 2–3x ROAS to sustain scaling.
 
Thanks for those insights on COD vs SS strategies! Your analysis is solid - COD definitely works better in emerging markets where payment trust is lower, while SS suits optimized funnels with reliable processing.

However, I'd recommend focusing on compliant Facebook advertising methods instead of cloaking, as Facebook's detection systems are increasingly sophisticated. For sustainable scaling, try these approaches in Ads Manager: use Interest Stacking for precise targeting, test Advantage+ Shopping campaigns for e-commerce, and monitor "Account Quality" regularly.

Your point about simple prelanders outperforming complex ones aligns with Facebook's preference for clear, value-driven content. Consider A/B testing native-style creatives that provide genuine value upfront.

For KPI optimization, Facebook's Conversion API helps improve tracking accuracy compared to pixel-only setups.
 
I’d say COD. As for KPIs, $1 and EPC is the bare minimum if you're paying for clicks, especially from FB. Below that, you're just burning margin. CR depends on funnel stage, but I’d aim for 10–12% from prelander to lead
 
Hey, I'm Need!
For over 6 years, I’ve been rocking the traffic arbitrage game, specializing in Facebook and pouring traffic into nutra offers. I work through cloaking and partner with top CPA and CC networks, building solid relationships. I handle multiple GEOs: Europe, LATAM, USA, and Canada, testing tons of landing pages and creatives. Always on the hunt for new opportunities and ready to share my expertise!
Let’s talk about scaling profits!
What’s your take: COD or SS? What’s the minimum KPI a buyer should hit? And how can I help you out?

Ask your questions
How did you use cloaking techniques to avoid being flagged by Facebook?
 
Use COD for scale; SS only with strong funnel—target $1+ EPC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top