Does anyone try posting upto 2400 post's in a day on Twitter?

[symonkings]

After researching, I found out that Twitter has a limit of 2,400 posts per day. Has anyone tried posting that much? If yes, can someone share the results?

 

[moazam12]

Yes

 

[symonkings]

Yes

That's great can you please share me the results I mean can I post upto 100 post's each hour? And will they banned your account if you post upto 2400 in each day.

 

[Venusaur]

Ignore this random newbie offering services.
Why would you need 2400 posts per day? Your account would be probably flagged as a spammy account before the second hour

 

[symonkings]

Ignore this random newbie offering services.
Why would you need 2400 posts per day? Your account would be probably flagged as a spammy account before the second hour

I see so you try it righ.?

 

[imccafey]

Yes, supposedly Twitter now lets you do 2400 tweets per day, including retweets. You shouldn't cap all at once though, ideally do 300 tweets/retweets over a 3-hour period. Spanning that sort of thing out is preferred anyway so you don't immediately come off as a spammer. Also personally, I'd avoid hitting the 2400 limit at all, just some generous number below that should do.

 

[symonkings]

O

Yes, supposedly Twitter now lets you do 2400 tweets per day, including retweets. You shouldn't cap all at once though, ideally do 300 tweets/retweets over a 3-hour period. Spanning that sort of thing out is preferred anyway so you don't immediately come off as a spammer. Also personally, I'd avoid hitting the 2400 limit at all, just some generous number below that should do.

K so look how about this I will post around 80-90 a hour which will be around 1900-2100 so it's okay?

 

[tsudoko]

You’ll get banned for spamming WAY before hitting the actual limit for 2400 posts.

 

[symonkings]

You’ll get banned for spamming WAY before hitting the actual limit for 2400 posts.

Oh yeah? Really? So tell me newbie do you try it? If yes can you show me results or something.

 

[imccafey]

O

K so look how about this I will post around 80-90 a hour which will be around 1900-2100 so it's okay?

That sounds about fine. Though honestly, it's not a hard rule to avoid the limit. It's just that on a normal personal account you're not likely to hit 2400 in one day so just in case they keep tabs of that sort of thing.

 

[ContentOptimizer]

Not very good, if you post 2400 times a day, your account is likely to be directly banned by the platform. But you can try using automated tools to manage 600+accounts and then release them regularly. It may seem impossible to achieve, but there is a powerful tool that may be able to. You can experiment with it.

 

[symonkings]

Hello everyone I am thinking of creating a bot that can post upto 1500 post's in a day on Twitter including affiliate links so will it be okay?

 

[mrseo1]

Yes, supposedly Twitter now lets you do 2400 tweets per day, including retweets. You shouldn't cap all at once though, ideally do 300 tweets/retweets over a 3-hour period. Spanning that sort of thing out is preferred anyway so you don't immediately come off as a spammer. Also personally, I'd avoid hitting the 2400 limit at all, just some generous number below that should do.

Are really 100 tweets/hour fine?

Even 1 tweet/minute seems like a lot. Maybe I'm missing something?

 

[imccafey]

Are really 100 tweets/hour fine?

Even 1 tweet/minute seems like a lot. Maybe I'm missing something?

It can be fine depending on what you're doing or the quality of the tweets/replies (because I think replies also count to that cap). Primarily though, or at least going by the language Twitter goes uses to present the info, it’s about behavior patterns and account trust. That said, I'm fairly sure newer or low-trust accounts doing 100 hour will flag you in some way especially if it has heavy link usage.
On retrospect, almost any number of tweets above 10 per hour can look spammy if there’s no engagement or variety in content. Upper limits aside, it'd be safer to ease into volume gradually and look organic in the process. Use a scheduler to space them out naturally perhaps.

 

[nvlus]

You’ll get banned for spamming WAY before hitting the actual limit for 2400 posts.

Most I've ever done is 531 replies in 4 hours. And hardly any posts.

It was brutal, but worth it. I got over 60 followers from that haul.

Then again, I did it completely from the X Android app on my phone. So no automation, proxies, VPNs etc involved here.

No penalties whatsoever

 

[papadigico]

After researching, I found out that Twitter has a limit of 2,400 posts per day. Has anyone tried posting that much? If yes, can someone share the results?

Yeah, I looked into that too. Twitter does allow up to 2,400 posts per day, but that’s just the technical limit. I tested it on one of my aged accounts and tried around 300–400 posts in a day (tweets, replies, and retweets combined).

After passing 150, I noticed some delays and a drop in visibility — tweets weren’t getting pushed as much. On newer or inactive accounts, going that high could easily trigger flags.

From my experience, staying under 100–150 posts per day feels much safer, especially if you’re not using any automation. Slow and steady posting tends to perform better in the long run.

 

[symonkings]

I am going to 10 post's a hour for 15 hours daily

Yeah, I looked into that too. Twitter does allow up to 2,400 posts per day, but that’s just the technical limit. I tested it on one of my aged accounts and tried around 300–400 posts in a day (tweets, replies, and retweets combined).

After passing 150, I noticed some delays and a drop in visibility — tweets weren’t getting pushed as much. On newer or inactive accounts, going that high could easily trigger flags.

From my experience, staying under 100–150 posts per day feels much safer, especially if you’re not using any automation. Slow and steady posting tends to perform better in the long run.

 

[favorit555]

I read your topic and the answers... first a question? Why do you need 100 or 200 tweets a day? If it's stupid spam, your tweets will probably get into filters, won't give organic traffic and will generally kill your profile if you just spam... I don't know if it gives you traffic.. I'm not sure, for example, you make a post and then immediately several more, Xtwitter distributes traffic to several of your posts at once, there is no concentration on one post, which could possibly give you good traffic, study the Twitter algorithm, one post that Xtwitter picked up, plus a little promotion with your auxiliary profiles will give better traffic and trust to your profile than your 300 useless tweets a day

 

[mrseo1]

It can be fine depending on what you're doing or the quality of the tweets/replies (because I think replies also count to that cap). Primarily though, or at least going by the language Twitter goes uses to present the info, it’s about behavior patterns and account trust. That said, I'm fairly sure newer or low-trust accounts doing 100 hour will flag you in some way especially if it has heavy link usage.
On retrospect, almost any number of tweets above 10 per hour can look spammy if there’s no engagement or variety in content. Upper limits aside, it'd be safer to ease into volume gradually and look organic in the process. Use a scheduler to space them out naturally perhaps.

Since Musk's takeover, it feels that new accounts are harder to start with, but the algorithm is more lenient than before when you have an aged account

 

[MaxiProviders]

To get around copyright issues, I made an archive account where I'd post the tweets from my main account first so no one could file a copyright claim.

There were nearly 10,000 videos, and to get it done quickly, I made the posting intervals short. I got the "you can't post any more tweets" warning before I could even see 2,400 of the posts.