AI for Creative Writing, which is best?

djbankrupt

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2010
Messages
228
Reaction score
43
I've played around with a few of the tools out there, but I've been mostly disappointed with the creative writing side.
Great for structure, and article writing, but it's been at least for me kind of crappy at writing creative niche short stories.
What one do you think is best? Grok? Gemini? ChatGPT? I seem to end up re-writing allot of it to sound more human.
 
I did write a whole eBook just with chatgpt with minimal effort, reread the content it gave me, fixed some small things and everything is great! You have to write really good prompts tho, can’t give you much tips on that but the better understandable your prompt (sentences) are for chatgpt, the better the result
 
I've played around with a few of the tools out there, but I've been mostly disappointed with the creative writing side.
Great for structure, and article writing, but it's been at least for me kind of crappy at writing creative niche short stories.
What one do you think is best? Grok? Gemini? ChatGPT? I seem to end up re-writing allot of it to sound more human.
The prompt is the king :)
Not a tool!
 
Chat gpt and gemini, I use both and don't have any problem but I always edit and check the before moving to something else is not only AI somtimes are my own ideas and research too.
 
Chatgpt for me, once I give it a good prompting, I’m good to go. I tweak it till I get a good one.
 
Times is not against you here, these AI's becomes better and better. You give them a writing style (not a role) and he will wirte in that "human like" mimick style which sounds not bad! Problem is the longer you rprompts become or more often you repeat prompts- also to write a 10 chapters ebook as example, then the AI falls back into robotic and hallucination, repeats same sentences in any new paraphrase etc,etc.... like "let's face it" , "the digital landscape" and that sort of hallucination. Or the AI mixes up your numbers and names, this is programmed by "elites" , really? With that guys, I must always re-read the AI content or the chapter (for ebook) to be sure the AI is not using in any new paraphrase the same sentences and words.

Why copilot, gpt, gemini, perplexity, always falls back in their hallucination when I use prompts often in conversations, questions, content writing ?
 
I've played around with a few of the tools out there, but I've been mostly disappointed with the creative writing side.
Great for structure, and article writing, but it's been at least for me kind of crappy at writing creative niche short stories.
What one do you think is best? Grok? Gemini? ChatGPT? I seem to end up re-writing allot of it to sound more human.
I think it depends on what you're writing. I'm a huge fan of Claude Opus across the board. I would suggest that you try the free versions of all the AI tools and see which one is closer to what you're after. If you don't want to go that route, a great way to test many models is by using OpenRouter. You can test several models, along with open-source models, and see which ones work the best for you. You only have to deposit $5, and if you're using the open source models, five dollars goes quite a ways.
 
I've mainly used Chatgpt for rewriting text to fix grammar. Writing an entire ebook with AI tools requires prompt engineering skills and patience. AI sometimes messes up things. So, you need to proofread everything and rewrite as many times as required to keep things under control. You may also need to have short description to remind AI once in a while about the themes & characters. The AI is growing over time to remember large chunks of information, so future updates may generate entire ebook just with a little guidance from us.
 
Grok 3 produces some quality content but it seems it patterns content already on the net.
 
I've played around with a few of the tools out there, but I've been mostly disappointed with the creative writing side.
Great for structure, and article writing, but it's been at least for me kind of crappy at writing creative niche short stories.
What one do you think is best? Grok? Gemini? ChatGPT? I seem to end up re-writing allot of it to sound more human.
In fact, AI can give some ideas, but writing itself only has emotion and rationality because it is written by humans.
 
I think it depends on what you're writing. I'm a huge fan of Claude Opus across the board. I would suggest that you try the free versions of all the AI tools and see which one is closer to what you're after. If you don't want to go that route, a great way to test many models is by using OpenRouter. You can test several models, along with open-source models, and see which ones work the best for you. You only have to deposit $5, and if you're using the open source models, five dollars goes quite a ways.
Yep, free version of Claude, after 6 prompts you be locked out for the next 24 hrs. ! With free version you can write max. 2 long articles every day.
 
In fact, AI can give some ideas, but writing itself only has emotion and rationality because it is written by humans.
Try it to give the AI a writing style from some authors as example and you will see the difference.
 
ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, Claude...try all of them and check which one is working better for your needs
 
How you prompt is the key. In my opinion ChatGPT can produce good articles if you add a quality prompt. + final article needs to be edited by a human.
 
I've played around with a few of the tools out there, but I've been mostly disappointed with the creative writing side.
Great for structure, and article writing, but it's been at least for me kind of crappy at writing creative niche short stories.
What one do you think is best? Grok? Gemini? ChatGPT? I seem to end up re-writing allot of it to sound more human.

I would say it all depends on on the prompt given for the most part, ChatGPT can do it with very explicit instructions as can Grok - Gemini is more tuned for professional use but can do it.

NGPT or NotGPT takes the instruction part away by just adjusting sliders.
 
Back
Top