Twitter accounts per IP

Shifter2600

Newbie
Joined
Apr 1, 2019
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
My Question is what has been your experience with the # of accounts running per IP? These are only used for search and reading posts.

These accounts are already suspect but that's still OK for search.
We have 4-5 user accounts per proxy at the moment and it's stable.
 
Last edited:
My Question is what has been your experience with the # of accounts running per IP? These are only used for search and reading posts.

These accounts are already suspect but that's still OK for search.
We have 4-5 user accounts per proxy at the moment and it's stable.
From experience, running 4-5 accounts per proxy is generally stable, especially if they’re only being used for search and reading posts. However, the ideal number can vary based on the platform’s sensitivity, the quality of your proxies (residential vs. datacenter), and how frequently the accounts are active. If you notice any restrictions, you might want to test lowering the number per proxy or rotating them more frequently
 
From experience, running 4-5 accounts per proxy is generally stable, especially if they’re only being used for search and reading posts. However, the ideal number can vary based on the platform’s sensitivity, the quality of your proxies (residential vs. datacenter), and how frequently the accounts are active. If you notice any restrictions, you might want to test lowering the number per proxy or rotating them more frequently
these are already sus accounts though and prone to ratelimits because they are used 24/7 with breaks between hit of rate limit. so my question is since they are sus already is there any additional risk if I ramp them upto 10 accounts per proxy or even 20?
 
these are already sus accounts though and prone to ratelimits because they are used 24/7 with breaks between hit of rate limit. so my question is since they are sus already is there any additional risk if I ramp them upto 10 accounts per proxy or even 20?
You're really running the risk of them connecting all your accounts and deleting them at once. I wouldn't risk it imo
 
My Question is what has been your experience with the # of accounts running per IP? These are only used for search and reading posts.

These accounts are already suspect but that's still OK for search.
We have 4-5 user accounts per proxy at the moment and it's stable.
the fewer the better
 
these are already sus accounts though and prone to ratelimits because they are used 24/7 with breaks between hit of rate limit. so my question is since they are sus already is there any additional risk if I ramp them upto 10 accounts per proxy or even 20?
Since the accounts are already getting rate-limited, increasing to 10-20 per proxy will likely make things worse—more frequent CAPTCHAs, blocks, or even bans. If you’re okay with some accounts burning out, you can test it, but staggering activity, using rotating proxies, or mixing in residential IPs might help keep them running longer.
 
Since the accounts are already getting rate-limited, increasing to 10-20 per proxy will likely make things worse—more frequent CAPTCHAs, blocks, or even bans. If you’re okay with some accounts burning out, you can test it, but staggering activity, using rotating proxies, or mixing in residential IPs might help keep them running longer.
im using static proxies that do not change the ip that the accounts use. wouldnt rotating proxies be problematic since tha account would be seen on multiple geo ips i would think this would flag the account pretty quickly. When I say having 10-20 on a single IP I don't mean having all of them connected concurrently. Would that matter? Is it the fact that 10 - 20 accounts have used the same IP or that 10-20 accounts are connected and using the ip at the same time? Could I get away with more accounts against the same ip as long as we limit concurrent ip use to only up to 4 of the same ip at a time.?
 
im using static proxies that do not change the ip that the accounts use. wouldnt rotating proxies be problematic since tha account would be seen on multiple geo ips i would think this would flag the account pretty quickly. When I say having 10-20 on a single IP I don't mean having all of them connected concurrently. Would that matter? Is it the fact that 10 - 20 accounts have used the same IP or that 10-20 accounts are connected and using the ip at the same time? Could I get away with more accounts against the same ip as long as we limit concurrent ip use to only up to 4 of the same ip at a time.?
You're right that rotating proxies can be risky if they switch geo-locations, but session-based residential proxies can help. The issue isn't just the number of accounts per IP but also activity patterns—staggering logins and interactions is key. Limiting concurrent use to 4 accounts per IP could reduce flags, but testing different setups is the best way to find what works.
 
4-5 accounts per proxy seems to be a safe approach, if it changes in the future, you may reduce this number, for now you can keep working like that.
More accounts per proxy could put them at risk
 
Back
Top