A good UDP proxy that can really fake webRTC

novakovo

Newbie
Joined
Dec 21, 2024
Messages
13
Reaction score
6
I need a good proxy that can fake WebRTC, most of service doesnot provide UDP, or UDP is semi-fake (pass stun, not turn ...)


Tks
 
I need a good proxy that can fake WebRTC, most of service doesnot provide UDP, or UDP is semi-fake (pass stun, not turn ...)


Tks
A good anti-detect browser combined with a reliable mobile proxy is essential.

It's true that there aren’t many providers offering real SOCKS5 with UDP support.

If you need more help, let me know.
 
I need a good proxy that can fake WebRTC, most of service doesnot provide UDP, or UDP is semi-fake (pass stun, not turn ...)


Tks
That can be tricky since many services don’t fully support WebRTC masking. You might want to check providers that offer advanced WebRTC leak protection or consider pairing it with proper browser configurations for better results.
 
Good proxy doesn't fake WebRTC. It just transmits TCP and UDP which makes WebRTC tests pass.
Keep in mind , the sole fact you don't pass WebRTC test, doesn't mean the proxy is bad. It might mean the latency between proxy client and the website is too high. If it is the case, WebRTC/UDP will always fail (because WebRTC will not even try UDP).
 
which anti-detect browsers do support QUIC?
i think it's not about antidetect browser but about setup inside antidetect browser: You just need to create a proper configuration when setting up browser profiles, if your user-agent has outdated versions of browsers or browsers that don't support Quic - Quic won't even try to establish a connection
 
i think it's not about antidetect browser but about setup inside antidetect browser: You just need to create a proper configuration when setting up browser profiles, if your user-agent has outdated versions of browsers or browsers that don't support Quic - Quic won't even try to establish a connection
I did ask that question because as per my knowledge chrome doesn't support UDP over socks5 in it's core, so no anti-detect can support UDP and thus the QUIC protocol, it's not about user-agents, what you said doesn't make much sense, sorry
 
I did ask that question because as per my knowledge chrome doesn't support UDP over socks5 in it's core, so no anti-detect can support UDP and thus the QUIC protocol, it's not about user-agents, what you said doesn't make much sense, sorry
yeah my bad, you right
 
Back
Top