AI CONTENT WRITING IS JUST A BUBBLE

[Akinyande ayo]

I've been using AI, chat GPT and others to write articles for 2 years now, and I can say this is not going to fly as expected or claimed.

Last year, I generated 500+ articles using different prompts, and was later adding human touches to improve their quality and use for Parasites and Guest posts.

With my experience with these contents, mostly generated by Chat GPT, it's just a bubble that's about to burst.

The buzz of AI writers is almost gone.
You can say the strength lies on prompt engineering, AI will get better in the future, more AI writing machine will be developed just like people claim DeepSeek is better than ChatGPT today bla bla bla bla.

AI contents lack Credibility and Reliability, 2 important factors in Data analysis.

Of what use is data that's not reliable?

If writers would have to understand the topic, and be able to proofread and remove non-factual sentences before using a generated article on a blog with real audience, then, such contents are useless.

I think more people will not border to use AI writers for serious projects in the future unless you're offering services.

 

[vcacheboot]

The Ai content still work for now . A lot of sites rank using AI content so may be a bublle or not but is still works and that is most important

 

[RichMedusa]

If things remained static, I would agree
But there is a tendency for improvement in the future
Right now ''If writers would have to understand the topic, and be able to proofread and remove non-factual sentences before using a generated article on a blog with real audience, then, such contents are useless.'' is an accurate statement, but who knows in the future...AI is at its VERY early stage, I assume this kind of problem will be fixed soon

 

[SirLouen]

With my experience with these contents, mostly generated by Chat GPT, it's just a bubble that's about to burst.

The burst will be the search results as we know them now.

 

[tazarbm]

it's just a bubble that's about to burst.

The buzz of AI writers is almost gone.

yep! I give it 3 more years and after that the retarded AI will be history...

I mean, some niche-y industries (coding, science, etc) will probably still use the AI for a long time, but for writing and creativity I don't think it will have the same popularity as it has now... if even that...

 

[Akinyande ayo]

The Ai content still work for now . A lot of sites rank using AI content so may be a bublle or not but is still works and that is most important

It's not about ranking here, but credibility and reliability of the text

If things remained static, I would agree
But there is a tendency for improvement in the future
Right now ''If writers would have to understand the topic, and be able to proofread and remove non-factual sentences before using a generated article on a blog with real audience, then, such contents are useless.'' is an accurate statement, but who knows in the future...AI is at its VERY early stage, I assume this kind of problem will be fixed soon

The world is dynamic so subject matters. As we have more inventions, innovations, and advanced learning, the more AI would have to process.

AI largely rely on search engines and websites today, so shall it be tomorrow.

There's often a divergent view on most subject matters, and with submissions by professionals in any industry, there's always a connect in their view.

AI seems to only output the most related facts to a prompt and wrap it around the subject with a bit of probabilistic content texture.

The burst will be the search results as we know them now.

Don't really understand this

 

[Walterwhit]

This thing is not going anywhere.


It is different than crypto.

 

[Roger Marquez]

AI contents lack Credibility and Reliability, 2 important factors in Data analysis.

Maybe you need to further "tweak" your prompts or look into other AI tools but, this shouldn´t be the case.

 

[Akinyande ayo]

Maybe you need to further "tweak" your prompts or look into other AI tools but, this shouldn´t be the case.

Why don't you let me give you 5 topics so you can use your best prompt to produce articles, and let's validate the facts therein.

 

[MajestySEO]

AI content writing is not a bubble, it’s just a tool, and its value depends on how you use it. Early AI had issues, but it’s improving fast. The key is using AI as an assistant, not a replacement. You control AI, not the other way around. To make AI content valuable, you must add insights, fact check, and refine the output.

If your articles are not ranking, AI might not be the problem, it could be your topic selection, SEO strategy, or execution. AI will not magically rank content, it still needs proper keyword research and optimization. If you are struggling, hire someone who knows how to get results. Google doesn’t hate AI content, just low quality content. At the end, it’s all about how you use the tool.

 

[Ralphoton]

AI content writing isn’t just hype it’s a tool, and like any tool, it works best in the right hands.

 

[Webmastermarket]

AI content is fast but not reliable on its own; you still need human approval and fact-checking.

 

[Md Sahid Mia]

You made some solid points. I agree that AI content alone isn’t enough. But when used with human editing and topic knowledge, it can still save a lot of time. It’s more of a tool, not a full solution.

 

[Akinyande ayo]

This thing is not going anywhere.


It is different than crypto.

I know this before now, and now everybody has joined the bandwagon to develop their AI writing machine.

AI writing machine will evolve to something else as we already heard chat gpt is working on new features solely to market products.

 

[Floppy Disc]

You can claim it's a bubble but I am using it daily to rewrite articles and it's doing a fantastic job so not sure this bubble will be burst anytime soon

 

[dvmagic]

the quality of ai critically depends of prompt you input, if you input standard fluff like "imagine you are super expert ... and write an expert text" you will get a total fluff, normal promt looks like a4 page with detailed instructions

 

[Alexander301]

ChatGPT is not an AI content writer. To write great content using AI, you need to use multiple AI layers, fine-tuned models, API access to repositories, web search and latest info. Good prompts are part of it, but it is not a 1 step process.

 

[dvmagic]

ChatGPT is not an AI content writer. To write great content using AI, you need to use multiple AI layers, fine-tuned models, API access to repositories, web search and latest info. Good prompts are part of it, but it is not a 1 step process.

looks like you've listed all you've heard about it. I don't know what it all about, i use ChatGpt, Claude and XGPTWriter (in case of bulk content) and usually it gives human-written quality

 

[dvmagic]

Here’s the verdict from several AI detectors, the most popular ones show 100% human authorship, and the most advanced one I usually use explains why. The kicker? This entire text was written from A to Z by an AI writer. So while you’re busy listing all those fancy AI layers and tools you ‘need’ to write great content, here are three screenshots proving that just quality prompting alone can deliver great results — and honestly, I don’t even know half of what you mentioned.

 

[Alexander301]

Here’s the verdict from several AI detectors, the most popular ones show 100% human authorship, and the most advanced one I usually use explains why. The kicker? This entire text was written from A to Z by an AI writer. So while you’re busy listing all those fancy AI layers and tools you ‘need’ to write great content, here are three screenshots proving that just quality prompting alone can deliver great results — and honestly, I don’t even know half of what you mentioned.

Ranking content is what I am after, and not passing the 100% human authorship test.