hey man, no offense intended (honestly), but you can't expect people to send you their money makers just so you (a completely random stranger to them) can test some theory that you might have had.
People who test SEO theories and case studies either do it with their own sites, or - if they happen to have clients - they ask their clients AFTER they've ranked their sites whether or not they're OK with sharing their sites as case studies. That's how these things usually go.
Again, no offense intended to you (I've got no beef with you anymore
), but you came here beating your chest about shaking the SEO industry to the core with your groundbreaking vision of ranking websites without backlinks, but so far you've not delivered a single hint about your theory, but you want people to trust you implicitly by sharing their websites with you who - in their opinion - might be a google employee for all they know.... It just doesn't work like this
Just get to 100 messages by participating in discussions, offering value (for free for now), building trust with people, and then - after you will have reached 100 messages and 60 days of BHW membership - you can become paid member and share your theories with us (for money if you want, if you're giving us the real deal I'm sure you'll bank hard). But before that happens, I don't think anyone will share their websites with you when I, and other members, strongly advocate against making the websites, niches, and keywords public on the biggest SEO forum on the planet. That's not how it works...
Anyway, sorry for the long message and honestly, I've got no beef with you anymore. So I hope you take this reply as constructive criticism instead of judgement and you get motivated to prove us all wrong. I'd love to see it
