Boosting Ezine Views

[bgibson8708]

oh.. i guess i got caught up in all the arrows pointing to different places last time I read it. Thanks.

 

[cheapyoutubeviews]

There is a section in there that talks about boosting ezine views as well as becoming the most published.

Good ebook, thanks for the share.

 

[Danzig]

Put some hidden Iframes on your sites, buy traffic or create a macro with the Foxyproxy add-on for firefox if you want to rate the articles etc.

Just clearing the cookies might get you banned for rating your own article.

 

[Kid Shaleen]

Unfortunately script writting is a bit beyond my knowledge despite it's ease. I've thought about learning php, but building backlinks has also seemed like the better invesmtent of time in terms of ROI and making money. Maybe I should stop being a pussy about it and just learn it.

I've just started writing imacros that hit specific pages with different amounts of time between each it.

I didn't set out to "learn" imacros; I grabbed some posted elsewhere on bhw and simply changed a few things. "Learning" took perhaps ten minutes.

 

[Jackst]

Hello everyone,

New here, just signed up ... found this post of interests and thought I'd share my recent findings in reference to the following quote posted prior.

Originally Posted by Yukinari84 http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/197252-boosting-ezine-views.html#post1762222
Sending paid clicks like donkeymails works great, and this is my personal favorite as of now.

You will need to use a double-meta refresh to hide where you are getting the traffic from though if you want it to work, and you definitely want to spread things out a little over time if you are going to be sending a lot of views.

Yesterday I had an e-mail conversation with a WF member who is the author of a very popular WSO on article marketing. In his method he shows how to use outsourcing to get your Ezine articles listed in their "Most Viewed" & "Most Published" sections.

The method he used for getting 1K clicks on his article to get it listed in the "Most Published" section was exactly the same as Yukinari84 mentioned. However this report was written sometime in 2009, so I decided to e-mail him and find out if the method was still valid.

He said that using the double meta redirect with "Donkeymail.com" was no longer working. He didn't state as to exactly why it no longer worked. but did say you could still accomplish the same goal using Mturk.

And that the only difference would be that 1K hits from Mturk will run you a lot more than when using Donkeymail.com, and using Mturk you would not need to use the double meta redirect.

Excuse me if my question is rather naive, as I don't yet know a lot about how links & IP tracking etc works.

For I have never used Donkeymail service and not sure exactly how it works, but I'm guessing the way it is done creates more of a footprint as opposed to individual Mturk workers clicking on links. Hence the need for the double meta redirect. Correct?

That being said, if I created a Mturk "Hit" using a link to the "ezine publisher" page for my article... along with the anchor text of say ..."Click Here" ...that Ezine will not be able to determine that the peeps from Mturk came from my Hit link?

Also being you can not tell how many times an article has been "Published" you don't know how many clicks you will need to beat it out. So if I created a Hit for say 50 clicks ... and it wasn't enough, I could just create another 50 click Hit. But what would happen if the same Mturk workers from my 1st Hit also accepted my 2nd Hit and clicked my link again using their same IP...might this raise flag at Ezine?

Yukinari84 have you used the Donkeymail method recently and if so have you noticed any difference in your result from past usage of this method?

Has anyone else here used Mturk successfully to get their articles listed on the Most Viewed & Published sections?

I look forward to your feedback.
Thanks,
Jack

 

[Yukinari84]

Hello everyone,

New here, just signed up ... found this post of interests and thought I'd share my recent findings in reference to the following quote posted prior.

Yesterday I had an e-mail conversation with a WF member who is the author of a very popular WSO on article marketing. In his method he shows how to use outsourcing to get your Ezine articles listed in their "Most Viewed" & "Most Published" sections.

The method he used for getting 1K clicks on his article to get it listed in the "Most Published" section was exactly the same as Yukinari84 mentioned. However this report was written sometime in 2009, so I decided to e-mail him and find out if the method was still valid.

He said that using the double meta redirect with "Donkeymail.com" was no longer working. He didn't state as to exactly why it no longer worked. but did say you could still accomplish the same goal using Mturk.

And that the only difference would be that 1K hits from Mturk will run you a lot more than when using Donkeymail.com, and using Mturk you would not need to use the double meta redirect.

Excuse me if my question is rather naive, as I don't yet know a lot about how links & IP tracking etc works.

For I have never used Donkeymail service and not sure exactly how it works, but I'm guessing the way it is done creates more of a footprint as opposed to individual Mturk workers clicking on links. Hence the need for the double meta redirect. Correct?

That being said, if I created a Mturk "Hit" using a link to the "ezine publisher" page for my article... along with the anchor text of say ..."Click Here" ...that Ezine will not be able to determine that the peeps from Mturk came from my Hit link?

Also being you can not tell how many times an article has been "Published" you don't know how many clicks you will need to beat it out. So if I created a Hit for say 50 clicks ... and it wasn't enough, I could just create another 50 click Hit. But what would happen if the same Mturk workers from my 1st Hit also accepted my 2nd Hit and clicked my link again using their same IP...might this raise flag at Ezine?

Yukinari84 have you used the Donkeymail method recently and if so have you noticed any difference in your result from past usage of this method?

Has anyone else here used Mturk successfully to get their articles listed on the Most Viewed & Published sections?

I look forward to your feedback.
Thanks,
Jack

DM is just one place you can get traffic from. There are quite a few others if you dig around.

The main point is you need to get real clicks from multiple IPS in order to get a view count.

The easiest way to do this is through paid junk traffic and even some bots.

I'm not sure whom you talked to, but considering it's a popular WF author, I'm not to concerned by him/her saying "it doesn't work". They always say that over there.

Not to mention the majority of people are a bunch of do-gooders that are against anything that even smells a little BH.

WF is not the best place for info.

 

[G0D0VERY0U]

Look into Russian services....

 

[hardinflash]

tweet attacks works great for boosting article views, just toss a link in with trending topics and you have a ton of free real human traffic
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[Jackst]

Thanks for the great advice everyone.

I especially like the tweet attacks hardinflash, though right now I currently have not built a Twitter following and I would like to get views/published asap.

Yukinari84 ...

The main point is you need to get real clicks from multiple IPS in order to get a view count.

...so Mturks would work okay for this purpose?

The easiest way to do this is through paid junk traffic and even some bots.

...what qualifies as paid junk traffic...Mturks, maildonkey etc?

BassTrackerBoats

Use the method that is outlined in the free ebook in my signature.

... sorry but I do not see such a ebook in your signature ...is it still available? ...I would love to read it.

Jack

 

[SHERRY2012]

Hi! Since scrapebox not working for boosting Ezine views, I use russian service: www dot boostviews dot org dot ru

Perhaps this can help you.

 

[neil007]

Sending paid clicks like donkeymails works great, and this is my personal favorite as of now.

You will need to use a double-meta refresh to hide where you are getting the traffic from though if you want it to work, and you definitely want to spread things out a little over time if you are going to be sending a lot of views.

Can you explain how exactly I go about using a double meta-refresh to hide my traffic source?