Why veersion with WWW is better?

I prefer the non www version since it makes the url shorter by 3 (or 4, if you count the dot) chars. I don’t think it matters much, though. Just make sure

1) Only one version is accessible. Redirect to the other one if both are accessible.

2) In case you cannot redirect, have a canonical url with the preferred version. That should (in theory… I prefer redirecting) achieve the same.
 
Last edited:
Hey Vldsam95, using `www.` or not is mostly a matter of preference and doesn't really affect SEO. Google treats both versions as the same website. You can choose whichever looks better for your brand.
 
There is no advantage using www. for SEO purpose, it's just your personal choice
 
Absolutely no difference... just a personal choice.
 
Hey

Why it is better to use URL with WWW?
for ex:
https://www.domain.com

is better than: https://domain.com?
There's no real difference, but you want to stick with one variation only. I personally prefer a non-www version of the domain. Sticking to one variation and getting redirects set up from the other(s) means that no matter how people link to you, they'll get to the right place, as will the majority of whatever link juice flows through those links.
 
It's mainly a matter of personal preference or brand consistency both versions work just fine for search engines
 
Both have some benefits and limitations. www is better for large website, restricted cookies policy, better for sub domain etc on the other hand non www is better for small website specifically branding websites, cookies policy is open etc.
 
Whether you use `www.` or not doesn’t affect SEO, so choose the option that best fits your brand.
 
Hey)
In my experience, using “https://www.domain.com” instead of “https://domain.com” can sometimes be better for several reasons.
For one, it can help with consistency and organizing how URLs are managed. Some servers and DNS setups work more smoothly , and it can make handling cookies and sessions easier since and non- versions can be treated differently. Also, many sites set up redirects so that both versions lead to the same place, which helps with SEO by avoiding duplicate content.
But honestly, it often comes down to personal or organizational preference. As long as you make sure to set up proper redirects, both options work fine.
 
there is no logical reason why www will be better for SEO
That is basically subliminally saying subdomains are more superior than non-www urls because www is technically an subdomain.

I prefer non-www URL, for more or less the same reason as everyone else, it is less to type and easier to remember & looks cleaner
 
There is actually no big difference from Google's perspective, both will work. Especially if you are asking in terms of SEO. But another perspective is that since we always remember "www" in TV commercials, there may be a slight attraction. Remember the commercials.

  • Personally, I would prefer "www" for more corporate companies, the reason for this is because of the digital marketing ads, marketing and TV commercials made on "www"
  • On blog sites, philosophy, etc., non-www versions can be preferred.

In general, both will work. I changed my blog page to the non-"www" version. If I have a corporate site (import, industry, etc.), I would probably save it as www.
 
But another perspective is that since we always remember "www" in TV commercials, there may be a slight attraction. Remember the commercials.
Hmm, not for at least a decade surely?

 
Back
Top