How to do internal linking automatically, without any plugin?
- Thread starter Auto Ai
- Start date
ChocolatePie
Junior Member
- Jul 8, 2024
- 129
- 135
Manually add a relevant link to a related word. That's it
GoogleIsBad
Newbie
- Jul 8, 2024
- 42
- 19
What is the problem about doing it with a plugin?
I want to make my own script that's why
GoogleIsBad
Newbie
- Jul 8, 2024
- 42
- 19
I see
In this case I think you should hire a freelancer to build your own script based on your needs
Or try to create a code on ChatGPT
MKSKS
Banned for failing to resolve dispute.
- Jul 11, 2013
- 6,098
- 4,465
Haven't you prepared your keywords topical cluster?
You need use the cluster relationship keywords to interlink the articles.
This is the best approach in terms of SEO relevance, content structuring.
The other option is using a plugin like:
https://wordpress.org/plugins/link-whisper/
https://wordpress.org/plugins/internal-links/
Chatgpt cannot able to do it
Afterall a tool cannot do all the seo things. I just need the internal link solution. Where it can select the proper anchort text to do the intenal link.
MKSKS
Banned for failing to resolve dispute.
- Jul 11, 2013
- 6,098
- 4,465
As I said before if you have keywords topical cluster ready use that.
Code a script to do that for you in case of bulk articles.
I understand, this will solve a temporary problem.
I want when post an article it will automatically crawl from sitemap and do link with anchor text.
Your solution is for some selected keywords.
I want for daily new case.
- May 20, 2019
- 1,381
- 573
MKSKS
Banned for failing to resolve dispute.
- Jul 11, 2013
- 6,098
- 4,465
No, maybe my process is different as I have moved from the old traditional autoblogging.
The content planning is the most important part for me, so I prepare my clusters first then feed it to the automation system.
I mostly build my content plan using SILO, as that has always worked good for me.
Your way is okay for single project. I was looking for bulk project. So everytime creating keyword cluster is not a better solution. Too much time consuming.
MKSKS
Banned for failing to resolve dispute.
- Jul 11, 2013
- 6,098
- 4,465
I have been doing this for over a decade now and it's not for single project.
The way you're approaching is something that used to work great few years back and I was using the same approach.
But, with the updates in past few years there's a risk involved in the old approach.
Site do rank and get traffic, but they also get taken down at some point.
The new approach minimizes this risk, so I have adapted to the new changes and made my old fully automated system semi-automated.
It also depends on your approach like if you're just looking to rank and bank from a project just like churn and burn it's ok.
But I have been running autoblogs for years and my goal is to make sure each of these gives me some passive income regularly.
I had started this back with 10 blogs and have scaled it to just over a 600 autoblogs until now.
And the content planning & content generation part is also something I have automated with custom scripted tools and AI to generate content that is at par with the serp results in terms of topical relevance.
- May 2, 2010
- 9,939
- 16,042
That looks shit hot, i been looking a way to have a visual rep of internal links for ages, might have to buy that plugin! lol thanks
I know it mate. But thx for detail explanation
- May 13, 2013
- 6,962
- 1,959
ChatGPT can't do much here.
- Jun 23, 2021
- 1,510
- 1,557
Mind if i ask, what is the old approach that can rank but might get taken down.
And what's different in the new approach that minimizes the risk?
don't need details but I was wondering what's what, thanks.
MKSKS
Banned for failing to resolve dispute.
- Jul 11, 2013
- 6,098
- 4,465
Old approach was to:
Grab a list of websites in same niche that are doing well scrap their content then spin that content (using google translate in my case) and post it.
There used to be a software back in the day called multiblogger that had more options like it took some keywords generated relevant lSI keywords, created content, and also posted the content.
It also had option to create content from a list of sitemap url's of different websites.
Content creation was using 3rd party spinning services like WordAI and it also had inbuild sytsem which was pretty good standard at that time.
For images royalty free images or scraped images were used.
Expired articles and their images were also a good source back then.
New approach:
As mentioned in my previous reply the new reply is semi-automated with the content planning being the most important part.
I use tools like seo powersuite, serpstat, and google search with seo extensions to create a topical relevant content plan with clustered topics/keywords.
This is done manually and is the most important part here.
Then content is generated with AI and optimized with AI after comparing the optimization with top serp result pages.
This process involves custom scripts and perfectly working prompts for the AI.
Once the optimization score for article is good it gets posted and I review myself and with a VA's on every Weekend.
For images I still rely on free CC and royalty free images.
Another most important change with my new approach is I focus more quality rather than quantity.
So, instead of thousands of articles posted per day it's now some hundreds posted per week with more relevance and better quality.
Plus based on data from seo tools non-performing articles are improved to meet the standards.
It's not an ideal white hat approach but a careful measured approach.