Quillbot Detects WriteSonic and ChatGPT texts

[knaller1]

Hi,
https://quillbot.com/de/ai-detector detects WriteSonic and ChatGPT. Is there a tool that can rewrite the text so that it is no longer recognized as AI content? If so, which one? It would be great if this tool retains the formatting.

 

[Dopious]

Well, if Quillbot detects it, why not use Quillbot to rewrite it.

 

[knaller1]

Well, if Quillbot detects it, why not use Quillbot to rewrite it.

i did and Quillbot still detects his own text

 

[4440]

Well, if Quillbot detects it, why not use Quillbot to rewrite it.

dear sir your IQ amazed me. clever.

 

[4440]

i did and Quillbot still detects his own text

your IQ also amazed me dear sir.
I will never think of such a genius hack.
Too bad it doesn't work Or should I say quillbot is so broken that its rewrite cannot pass its detection.

 

[Dopious]

dear sir your IQ amazed me. clever.

Want an ice cream now again?

 

[knaller1]

your IQ also amazed me dear sir.
I will never think of such a genius hack.
Too bad it doesn't work Or should I say quillbot is so broken that its rewrite cannot pass its detection.

do you contribute anything meaningful to the discussion? a rewriter should be able to write a text in such a way that, after a technical analysis, there is no longer any indication that it was generated by an AI. So he should no longer recognize his own text.

 

[4440]

Want an ice cream now again?

aha, I was just trying to use Quillbot to detect "Want an ice cream now again?".
Too bad it needs min. 80 words, so I am not aware if you are a real human or an AI without the help of AI detectors.

 

[4440]

do you contribute anything meaningful to the discussion? a rewriter should be able to write a text in such a way that, after a technical analysis, there is no longer any indication that it was generated by an AI. So he should no longer recognize his own text.

relax brother. I am not trolling here.
Using Quillbot to beat AI detectors is indeed a clever idea that I cannot think of.

To answer your question: I used Quillbot and a couple of rewriters back in the day but I don't bother about rewriting anymore. Rewrite will only lower the quality of your original text. If your AI content is of high quality, using a rewriter can only lower its readability. If your original AI text is cheap and of medium quality then why bother using a rewriter. If you want to retain the format, the old school translate method works great for this purpose.

 

[knaller1]

relax brother. I am not trolling here.
Using Quillbot to beat AI detectors is indeed a clever idea that I cannot think of.

To answer your question: I used Quillbot and a couple of rewriters back in the day but I don't bother about rewriting anymore. Rewrite will only lower the quality of your original text. If your AI content is of high quality, using a rewriter can only lower its readability. If your original AI text is cheap and of medium quality then why bother using a rewriter. If you want to retain the format, the old school translate method works great for this purpose.

i also try the translate method that works for the most AI Detectors. But on my today test the Quillbot detected them.
I only want to use a rewriter to avoid being penalized by Google at some point because these texts can be recognized.

 

[4440]

i also try the translate method that works for the most AI Detectors. But on my today test the Quillbot detected them.
I only want to use a rewriter to avoid being penalized by Google at some point because these texts can be recognized.

most rewriters are now powered by AI in some way even for Quillbot and translate.
So what you do is to use AI to bypass AI.
Say if your article is written in GPT-4, how can regular rewrites beat the performance of gpt-4?

It seems like you believe in AI detectors so I will not trying to convince you that AI detectors are just hype.

If you know some python, you can mix AI content and human content so that the "human-writing" ratio is high enough.
In that way you won't be panelized by google because some of your content is indeed human-written, you get the idea.

 

[PHPInjected]

Hi,
https://quillbot.com/de/ai-detector detects WriteSonic and ChatGPT. Is there a tool that can rewrite the text so that it is no longer recognized as AI content? If so, which one? It would be great if this tool retains the formatting.

What prompt types are you using with ChatGPT? Are you taking the output content and running it through ChatGPT with a modified prompt 2-3x?

 

[ZanardiSoso]

What about aitohumantextconverter

 

[knaller1]

most rewriters are now powered by AI in some way even for Quillbot and translate.
So what you do is to use AI to bypass AI.
Say if your article is written in GPT-4, how can regular rewrites beat the performance of gpt-4?

It seems like you believe in AI detectors so I will not trying to convince you that AI detectors are just hype.

If you know some python, you can mix AI content and human content so that the "human-writing" ratio is high enough.
In that way you won't be panelized by google because some of your content is indeed human-written, you get the idea.

well, the AI detectors have shown relatively clearly that they can recognize the difference between a human-written text and an AI-generated text. I don't know why Google shouldn't also use this for its own purposes to first recognize whether it is an AI text or not and then evaluate it accordingly. So as you say, the only thing left for me to do is to write the texts by hand?

What prompt types are you using with ChatGPT? Are you taking the output content and running it through ChatGPT with a modified prompt 2-3x?

I used AIPRM just with a simple keyword phrase. But my WriteSonic article get 100% AI detected also bei Quillbot. There i specify some related blogs and so on to build the article.

EDIT: And with diffrent Blog Templates

 

[AutomationIsKey]

Hi,
https://quillbot.com/de/ai-detector detects WriteSonic and ChatGPT. Is there a tool that can rewrite the text so that it is no longer recognized as AI content? If so, which one? It would be great if this tool retains the formatting.

Realisticially who gives a he-double hockey sticks what gets detected? Being honest? I have done case studies and asked many times in this forum and everyones data who's responded based off actual experience has concluded the same - if your information is valid | the user experience is not tarnished, you will rank regardless.

Ai Detectors are detecting patterns in your text. This is awesome, but be real here.. do you genuinely think on a non-spammy site scenario, that google has any care in the world to use the resources that it would take to determine the validity of this? And even such - think of how many sites who are not Ai generated but instead the learning sources, that would be affected.

 

[Dopious]

aha, I was just trying to use Quillbot to detect "Want an ice cream now again?".
Too bad it needs min. 80 words, so I am not aware if you are a real human or an AI without the help of AI detectors.

The fact is that Quillbot sucks since years ago, I stopped using them way back, nowadays I just adjust some minor things in my AI articles and just post them in my language. Works fine.

 

[4440]

well, the AI detectors have shown relatively clearly that they can recognize the difference between a human-written text and an AI-generated text. I don't know why Google shouldn't also use this for its own purposes to first recognize whether it is an AI text or not and then evaluate it accordingly. So as you say, the only thing left for me to do is to write the texts by hand?

1. Because Google does not care if it is AI. Google cares about serving its users and makes its users happy. If your AI content is good, google will show your content.
2. The only thing left for you to do is to not care about AI detections. Haven't you seen enough examples that real human contents are marked as AI?

 

[Tipblog]

actually ai content detection is a scam to sell the tools.

 

[knaller1]

1. Because Google does not care if it is AI. Google cares about serving its users and makes its users happy. If your AI content is good, google will show your content.
2. The only thing left for you to do is to not care about AI detections. Haven't you seen enough examples that real human contents are marked as AI?

i guess you're right. I'll just generate blog articles with AI and customize what's wrong. Then it should be ok for Google.

 

[4440]

The fact is that Quillbot sucks since years ago, I stopped using them way back, nowadays I just adjust some minor things in my AI articles and just post them in my language. Works fine.

yes, simple manual edits are just enough. Let alone you post them in language other than English then G would not give a sh*t about how you produce your content, as long as the content is of value.