Damn, I wasn`t hoping to get so much hate. I thought this was the Blackhat forum. Blackhat seo and stuff. How do you make money easier than all of those whitehat people?
People want to pay pennies for articles I`m not that good at writing I don`t have any special skills what`s so wrong for me to say I`m writing 100% original content (which is 100 % true because it`s original content)
It`s the same thing said in a 1000 ways. All niches are full with everything everything you can talk about it`s already has 1000 articles on Google.
The only unethical thing (since this is the black world forum, not the white hat forum, the only lie in all of this is they say have you written this by yourself, then I say yes I did.
Which is a half truth because I am rewriting certain parts of the article but not all of it. If the customer likes it he can pay for it and give a good review, if he got what he wanted and likes what I`ve given to him.
You're not getting hate. You're getting feedback from the community. Take it onboard and grow as a person and you'll achieve far more success in life.
It's a common misconception that people think blackhat = scamming.
It's not. It never has been.
It's blackhat marketing, which means you're engaging in techniques that flaunt the rules/terms of sites you're marketing on.
This isn't ScamHatWorld where we discuss how to deceive your customers. And the forum originally was blackhat SEO, which just means "doing anything to rank on Google" basically.
It's not "the only unethical thing". The core of your service is a complete lie.
As I said above, this is like saying you're selling someone a real rolex, and you sell them a replica. Fancy wording doesn't make this any less of a scam.
AI content is NOT the same quality as human. If someone is paying for a human, they want the time and effort to go into it that only a human can provide.
They don't want an AI generated article for $15 that they could have generated themselves for a cent. You are talking like "Oh it's just 2 little letters I'm missing out", but yes, "replica rolex" vs "real rolex" is just an extra 5 letters.. What's the harm.
Again, with the "half truth" stuff you are using euphisms and semantics to convince yourself that this is not an outright scam. If you do this you are no different than any other scammer.
Again, with this bullshit of "if the customer likes it".
All this means is you've successfully DECEIVED your customer.
You are putting the onus on your customer to do increased due dilligence because you are trying to deceive them, and if they don't do that, then you claim it's their own fault. This is such faulty logic used to justify scamming.
This is NOT how business works.
You are not being honest and upfront with your client. You are trying to hide something from them, and saying it's ok if they don't find out. How is this not scamming? This is EXACTLY what scammers do. A scammer is not someone who takes a payment and delivers nothing. It's someone that deceives people so well that most don't find out until it's too late.
Ie, "too late" in this case is you've got someone who's running an agency, they get paid by their client to do SEO and content. They hire you in good faith thinking you'll produce high quality work. You deliver AI crap, and they then publish it and 6 months later the client either has no results or they run a new and improved AI detector which flags it as AI. The agency loses the client. Because of YOUR SCAM. Yes, they should do as much due diligence as possible, but that's only because there are scammers out there. If everyone was running honest businesses then this wouldn't even be necessary.
I thanked you for explaining how Google works, so let me explain something to you in return. The AI language models can be trained on anything. Right now we are not talking about a knowledge base like news, historical facts, scientific discoveries, etc. This training data is used to compute the neuron weights. In fact, it shouldn't be human-generated content at all, because the language models don't care about its origin, so it can be synthetic data as well. I mean data generated by other AI models. For example, NVIDIA has just released its new super large 340B model called Nemotron-4 (
read this). The main purpose of this model is... to generate synthetic data that can be used to train other AI models. I think you've got my point now
So yes, there is the other way.
P.S. You can download and try Nemotron-4 yourself - it's opensource.
Yes, but all the original training data was created by humans. We are only where we are now because of the original human written data.