Video Embeds and Action Video Ranker

RhebaReaux

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2022
Messages
264
Reaction score
205
I just watched a Mark Hess video where he argued that setting up Youtube on page SEO correctly followed by sending video embeds was super effective for ranking. He made big claims for a software called ActionVideoRanker made by a guy I think called Kirk Crowley (not sure if I caught the name properly). Anyway, it's a pricey piece of software ($97/month), and I wondered if anyone is using it and can vouch for it?
To be fair to Mark - the video he used as an example was uploaded 4 months agao and is still at #1 for the keyword, and there's a fair number of competing videos.
 
It's $47 a month using Mark's link https://wwn.sslwebcart.com/action-video-ranker/?coupon=ACTION50 ... I'm getting ready to give it a shot. A long time ago I did youtube vids, made a little clickbank money but moved onto other things. I'm now giving youtube a shot again. Back then I created web 2.0;s & embedded the video url in articles on the web 2.0 pages and it did work - my videos ranked well. This software uses the same approach: embedding the url ... well .. SOMEwhere. I guess after awhile you could just google the youtube vid url & see where they're putting it. But anyway, unless things've changed a lot from a few years ago, the method should still work I guess. So I'm giving it a shot. Worst case I'll lose $47 ... they say you get 14 days to get a refund if you don't like it but who knows. Course you could always file a paypal & credit card disputes. Anyway....
 
It's $47 a month using Mark's link https://wwn.sslwebcart.com/action-video-ranker/?coupon=ACTION50 ... I'm getting ready to give it a shot. A long time ago I did youtube vids, made a little clickbank money but moved onto other things. I'm now giving youtube a shot again. Back then I created web 2.0;s & embedded the video url in articles on the web 2.0 pages and it did work - my videos ranked well. This software uses the same approach: embedding the url ... well .. SOMEwhere. I guess after awhile you could just google the youtube vid url & see where they're putting it. But anyway, unless things've changed a lot from a few years ago, the method should still work I guess. So I'm giving it a shot. Worst case I'll lose $47 ... they say you get 14 days to get a refund if you don't like it but who knows. Course you could always file a paypal & credit card disputes. Anyway....
Good luck: do let us know how it goes!
 
It's $47 a month using Mark's link https://wwn.sslwebcart.com/action-video-ranker/?coupon=ACTION50 ... I'm getting ready to give it a shot. A long time ago I did youtube vids, made a little clickbank money but moved onto other things. I'm now giving youtube a shot again. Back then I created web 2.0;s & embedded the video url in articles on the web 2.0 pages and it did work - my videos ranked well. This software uses the same approach: embedding the url ... well .. SOMEwhere. I guess after awhile you could just google the youtube vid url & see where they're putting it. But anyway, unless things've changed a lot from a few years ago, the method should still work I guess. So I'm giving it a shot. Worst case I'll lose $47 ... they say you get 14 days to get a refund if you don't like it but who knows. Course you could always file a paypal & credit card disputes. Anyway....
Updates on how is the software performing?
 
Updates on how is the software performing?

Hard to tell. It's been 3 weeks and there are some issues with it. When you submit a youtube video url, it asks "How many days to you wish to span for organic appearance of your Video Embeds/Backlinks to your YouTube Video?" and gives you a dropdown menu. You can choose 7, 14 or 30.

What the fuck does that mean? After a struggle I found out how to email the guy who I'm paying the $47/mo to, and I asked him. He blathered an equally incoherent response.

Does it mean, e.g. if you choose 7 days, that it'll create an embed once every 7 days for x weeks? Or does it mean it'll embed it once a day for 7 days then stop? Who knows.

I still don't know. I sent him 2 more emails seeking guidance and have not received a reply.

On the plus side, my videos are indeed ranking #1 for some of my targeted keywords in quotes, and much lower (so far) for that same keyword without quotes (youtube search, using Tor in multiple countries to rule-out youtube algo hanky-panky.)

One of the keywords for which the corresponding video is ranking #1 in quotes gets 900 searches a month on youtube according to ahrefs.

Not many total video views so far and no clickbank sales so far (I've tested only Clickbank so far since that's what I've gotten sales from in the distant past), but I have gotten a few hops.

One very telling thing is that the videos are jumping around a lot for the targeted keyword. I was #7 one day - and one day only - for a very competitive keyword in quotes, but the video has since vanished from youtube search results. Others have jumped up & down by 20 or 30 positions.

This is exactly the sort of behavior my youtube vids would display back in the days that I was embedding manually using Web 2.0 sites. After awhile they became firmly attached at or near the top of the rankings. So the fact that these videos are behaving that very same way is encouraging to me.

Of course, there's no way to know if all of this is due to merely following all the keyword rules Mark sets out in his video, and whether Action Video Ranker is having any effect at all. Or if it's even doing anything, since I can't figure out how to find out if a video has embeds and if so, where.

I'm intrigued enough that I'm going to give it some time. A few months at least. Meanwhile, I'll keep testing various niches and veer away from Clickbank etc just to see what happens. Of course at some point I'll have to do a scientific test where I use the ranking software on one video & not on another (all else being equal in terms of following Mark's keyword rules) and gauge the results.
 
Hard to tell. It's been 3 weeks and there are some issues with it. When you submit a youtube video url, it asks "How many days to you wish to span for organic appearance of your Video Embeds/Backlinks to your YouTube Video?" and gives you a dropdown menu. You can choose 7, 14 or 30.

What the fuck does that mean? After a struggle I found out how to email the guy who I'm paying the $47/mo to, and I asked him. He blathered an equally incoherent response.

Does it mean, e.g. if you choose 7 days, that it'll create an embed once every 7 days for x weeks? Or does it mean it'll embed it once a day for 7 days then stop? Who knows.

I still don't know. I sent him 2 more emails seeking guidance and have not received a reply.

On the plus side, my videos are indeed ranking #1 for some of my targeted keywords in quotes, and much lower (so far) for that same keyword without quotes (youtube search, using Tor in multiple countries to rule-out youtube algo hanky-panky.)

One of the keywords for which the corresponding video is ranking #1 in quotes gets 900 searches a month on youtube according to ahrefs.

Not many total video views so far and no clickbank sales so far (I've tested only Clickbank so far since that's what I've gotten sales from in the distant past), but I have gotten a few hops.

One very telling thing is that the videos are jumping around a lot for the targeted keyword. I was #7 one day - and one day only - for a very competitive keyword in quotes, but the video has since vanished from youtube search results. Others have jumped up & down by 20 or 30 positions.

This is exactly the sort of behavior my youtube vids would display back in the days that I was embedding manually using Web 2.0 sites. After awhile they became firmly attached at or near the top of the rankings. So the fact that these videos are behaving that very same way is encouraging to me.

Of course, there's no way to know if all of this is due to merely following all the keyword rules Mark sets out in his video, and whether Action Video Ranker is having any effect at all. Or if it's even doing anything, since I can't figure out how to find out if a video has embeds and if so, where.

I'm intrigued enough that I'm going to give it some time. A few months at least. Meanwhile, I'll keep testing various niches and veer away from Clickbank etc just to see what happens. Of course at some point I'll have to do a scientific test where I use the ranking software on one video & not on another (all else being equal in terms of following Mark's keyword rules) and gauge the results.
Awesome answer: thank you for taking the time!
 
Awesome answer: thank you for taking the time!

No problem. Another data point: I'm following a tip I learned here:
to create a short out of a long-form video. (The one thing he missed in that youtube video was that you can also choose the thumbnail for the short.)

I did that for one of the long-form videos to which I had applied Mark's keyword-stuffing procedure, and had submitted to AVR, and I also keyword-stuffed the short in the same manner and also submitted IT to AVR ... and in less than 24 hours, that short has gotten 267 views, 15 likes (1 dislike), SIX new subscribers, and a few views (and 1 Like) to the long-form video from which the short was derived.

No Clickbank hops as a result of all that activity, but I know from prior experience they will probably eventually come - along with sales. But again, how much of any of this is due to AVR? Who knows. But it's some very interesting stuff.
 
Last edited:
No problem. Another data point: I'm following a tip I learned here:
to create a short out of a long-form video. (The one thing he missed in that youtube video was that you can also choose the thumbnail for the short.)

I did that for one of the long-form videos to which I had applied Mark's keyword-stuffing procedure, and had submitted to AVR, and I also keyword-stuffed the short in the same manner and also submitted IT to AVR ... and in less than 24 hours, that short has gotten 267 views, 15 likes (1 dislike), SIX new subscribers, and a few views (and 1 Like) to the long-form video from which the short was derived.

No Clickbank hops as a result of all that activity, but I know from prior experience they will probably eventually come - along with sales. But again, how much of any of this is due to AVR? Who knows. But it's some very interesting stuff.
Interesting - thanks for the tip. I have been creating shorts using the free plan from Vidyo.ai - 75 minutes per month (but you could open multiple accounts to increase that). That's effectively 75 shorts per month or 2-3 per day - so maybe enough to test the idea and if you find it's working and you can make money, you could buy the Pro plan. It's so easy to create short videos and the ai does a reasonable job of finding useful segments. Also, you're not restricted to using your own videos and posting to YT. You could upload to Tiktok , Pinterest and/or Reels... That said you have to be careful: I screwed up a YT channel and a Pinterest account with this and haven't gone back to it.
 
Interesting - thanks for the tip. I have been creating shorts using the free plan from Vidyo.ai - 75 minutes per month (but you could open multiple accounts to increase that). That's effectively 75 shorts per month or 2-3 per day - so maybe enough to test the idea and if you find it's working and you can make money, you could buy the Pro plan. It's so easy to create short videos and the ai does a reasonable job of finding useful segments. Also, you're not restricted to using your own videos and posting to YT. You could upload to Tiktok , Pinterest and/or Reels... That said you have to be careful: I screwed up a YT channel and a Pinterest account with this and haven't gone back to it.
And another tip: https://www.capcut.com - the script-to-video option supports AI script generation - give it a topic and it'll write a script, and then make a video. It's a lot quicker than doing it all from scratch, and it's free.
 
Interesting - thanks for the tip. I have been creating shorts using the free plan from Vidyo.ai - 75 minutes per month (but you could open multiple accounts to increase that). That's effectively 75 shorts per month or 2-3 per day - so maybe enough to test the idea and if you find it's working and you can make money, you could buy the Pro plan. It's so easy to create short videos and the ai does a reasonable job of finding useful segments. Also, you're not restricted to using your own videos and posting to YT. You could upload to Tiktok , Pinterest and/or Reels... That said you have to be careful: I screwed up a YT channel and a Pinterest account with this and haven't gone back to it.

Holy crap! That Vidyo.ai is incredible! Thank you so much for the tip!!
 
I would like to ask if you need to log in a large number of accounts for this software you purchased, or if you only need to use this software to optimize the ranking
Hard to tell. It's been 3 weeks and there are some issues with it. When you submit a youtube video url, it asks "How many days to you wish to span for organic appearance of your Video Embeds/Backlinks to your YouTube Video?" and gives you a dropdown menu. You can choose 7, 14 or 30.

What the fuck does that mean? After a struggle I found out how to email the guy who I'm paying the $47/mo to, and I asked him. He blathered an equally incoherent response.

Does it mean, e.g. if you choose 7 days, that it'll create an embed once every 7 days for x weeks? Or does it mean it'll embed it once a day for 7 days then stop? Who knows.

I still don't know. I sent him 2 more emails seeking guidance and have not received a reply.

On the plus side, my videos are indeed ranking #1 for some of my targeted keywords in quotes, and much lower (so far) for that same keyword without quotes (youtube search, using Tor in multiple countries to rule-out youtube algo hanky-panky.)

One of the keywords for which the corresponding video is ranking #1 in quotes gets 900 searches a month on youtube according to ahrefs.

Not many total video views so far and no clickbank sales so far (I've tested only Clickbank so far since that's what I've gotten sales from in the distant past), but I have gotten a few hops.

One very telling thing is that the videos are jumping around a lot for the targeted keyword. I was #7 one day - and one day only - for a very competitive keyword in quotes, but the video has since vanished from youtube search results. Others have jumped up & down by 20 or 30 positions.

This is exactly the sort of behavior my youtube vids would display back in the days that I was embedding manually using Web 2.0 sites. After awhile they became firmly attached at or near the top of the rankings. So the fact that these videos are behaving that very same way is encouraging to me.

Of course, there's no way to know if all of this is due to merely following all the keyword rules Mark sets out in his video, and whether Action Video Ranker is having any effect at all. Or if it's even doing anything, since I can't figure out how to find out if a video has embeds and if so, where.

I'm intrigued enough that I'm going to give it some time. A few months at least. Meanwhile, I'll keep testing various niches and veer away from Clickbank etc just to see what happens. Of course at some point I'll have to do a scientific test where I use the ranking software on one video & not on another (all else being equal in terms of following Mark's keyword rules) and gauge the results.
I would like to ask if you need to log in a large number of accounts for this software you purchased, or if you only need to use this software to optimize the ranking
 
It's $47 a month using Mark's link https://wwn.sslwebcart.com/action-video-ranker/?coupon=ACTION50 ... I'm getting ready to give it a shot. A long time ago I did youtube vids, made a little clickbank money but moved onto other things. I'm now giving youtube a shot again. Back then I created web 2.0;s & embedded the video url in articles on the web 2.0 pages and it did work - my videos ranked well. This software uses the same approach: embedding the url ... well .. SOMEwhere. I guess after awhile you could just google the youtube vid url & see where they're putting it. But anyway, unless things've changed a lot from a few years ago, the method should still work I guess. So I'm giving it a shot. Worst case I'll lose $47 ... they say you get 14 days to get a refund if you don't like it but who knows. Course you could always file a paypal & credit card disputes. Anyway....

Why click on this website can only pay, there is no way to connect to the author and view the optimization of the successful task case
 
Holy crap! That Vidyo.ai is incredible! Thank you so much for the tip!!
Hi... Does Action Video Ranker still work in 2025?? I wanted to buy but did not find any recent reviews for the software anywhere on the net.
 
I just watched a Mark Hess video where he argued that setting up Youtube on page SEO correctly followed by sending video embeds was super effective for ranking. He made big claims for a software called ActionVideoRanker made by a guy I think called Kirk Crowley (not sure if I caught the name properly). Anyway, it's a pricey piece of software ($97/month), and I wondered if anyone is using it and can vouch for it?
To be fair to Mark - the video he used as an example was uploaded 4 months agao and is still at #1 for the keyword, and there's a fair number of competing videos.
Long-term effectiveness: If you can maintain rankings and increase views sustainably like Mark's video, the cost can be offset.
Self-study YouTube SEO: You can try learning video SEO techniques (optimizing titles, tags, descriptions, thumbnails, engagement, etc.) and compare the results with when using software.
Competitor analysis: Many other tools can also support keyword analysis, such as TubeBuddy or VidIQ, at a more reasonable price.
Try the trial version: If there is a trial version, you should take advantage of it to test whether the software is suitable for your workflow.
 
I think it's useless. You can do excellent SEO optimization yourself. Why pay someone else to do it?
 
Back
Top