linkbuilding web2.0 and indexing

[erichon]

Hi
First of all question 1: Is parasites and web 2.0 the same?

q2: Moneysite --- web 2.0 (like wordpress.com artikle links to inner pages of MS) ---- blast web 2.0 articles with SB (like comments) --- sucessful comment links indexing

Is this the right way?

 

[IM Dude]

1) No they are not same.
2) No because most web 2.0 are nofollow they don't pass linkjuice. Tiered link building needs to have do follow backlinks to money site.

 

[erichon]

So which kind of sites make sense? Gsa does not use web 2.0?

 

[praetserge]

1. No. Parasites are sites with high DA, PA, etc like LinkedIn
2. I prefer to use cheap PBN's for my Web2.0 properties (but make sure your web2's are d0follow)

 

[erichon]

So you link from pbn to web2. 0 and from there to money site?

 

[jonathan101]

1. they're totally different
2. this probably will not work.

 

[erichon]

1) No they are not same.
2) No because most web 2.0 are nofollow they don't pass linkjuice. Tiered link building needs to have do follow backlinks to money site.

2) wordpress com, blogspot, Blogger are dxfollxw

 

[Fiducia]

So which kind of sites make sense? Gsa does not use web 2.0?

Web 2.0s can be ********.

GSA SER alone does not post on many web 2.0 sites as many of these need more advanced systems. The SERLib add-on or alternatives like RankerX allow you to build Web 2.0s. These are pretty useless for SEO though and just a nice thing to expand your backlink profile. It makes much more sense to build your own Wordpress- and Tumblr-Blogs, set links to your money site from these and use SER to power up the Web 2.0s.

In addition, you will also need a paid indexer to get these Web 2.0 links indexed at all. And they all come with a PA 0.

Better to use SER to build links on established sites with PA and DA and to power these up.

 

[Tech Shark]

Hi
First of all question 1: Is parasites and web 2.0 the same?

q2: Moneysite --- web 2.0 (like wordpress.com artikle links to inner pages of MS) ---- blast web 2.0 articles with SB (like comments) --- sucessful comment links indexing

Is this the right way?

People already answered. Yet, I would say - not to fall too much of web 2.0s. Better go for ******** pbns and high DA free posts.

 

[erichon]

How to find pbns? Buy links? Create themself.?
High Da free posts can be scraped

 

[preeshusaket]

buy pbn its worked good

 

[synciaguard]

No, they are not the same tasks. Web 2.0 involves creating a relevant and proper domain and then posting our blogs/articles on that domain.

 

[proxygo]

So which kind of sites make sense? Gsa does not use web 2.0?

i thought gsa worked ok for 2.0

 

[NeedMyLink]

1. Nope, parasites and Web 2.0s aren't the same. Parasite SEO leverages high-authority third-party sites to rank content for competitive keywords (think high DA/PA platforms you piggyback on). Web 2.0s are more about creating content on platforms like WordPress.com, but they give you more control over your content and links.

2. Your strategy is a classic tiered link building approach. It can work, but blasting Web 2.0 articles with low-quality SB links is risky now.

 

[DECKEREDSEO]

Hi
First of all question 1: Is parasites and web 2.0 the same?

q2: Moneysite --- web 2.0 (like wordpress.com artikle links to inner pages of MS) ---- blast web 2.0 articles with SB (like comments) --- sucessful comment links indexing

Is this the right way?

Parasite is the trash links and web2.0s are contextual links known or considered as tier 1 foundation links

Parasite links could use as tier 3 or 2

 

[alonelywriter]

1. No.
2. Moneysite --- niche pbns --- web 2.0 (only do follow web 2.0 article links to niche pbns/inner pages of MS) ---- blast web 2.0 articles with SB (like comments) --- successful comment links indexing (A better suggestion)

 

[Marco69]

1) No they are not same.
2) No because most web 2.0 are nofollow they don't pass linkjuice. Tiered link building needs to have do follow backlinks to money site.

Yep they don't pass linkjuice, but more important is, these web2.0 barnacle parasites will rank good and bring traffic to your main site,, that is important not the linkjuice.

 

[IM Dude]

Yep they don't pass linkjuice, but more important is, these web2.0 barnacle parasites will rank good and bring traffic to your main site,, that is important not the linkjuice.

There is a google update against parasite, Google search:
site reputation abuse
Google constantly penalizes parasites. The parasites ranking today may not rank tomorrow. So unless you are constantly building new ones you may get traffic today you may not next month.

 

[team475]

i suggest you to stop getting mixed and confused with terms and artificial categorization.
you need 2 things:
1. Good valuable content
2. do follow backlinks from sites that are themeslves ranked high in your niche.
That's it.

 

[Marco69]

There is a google update against parasite, Google search:
site reputation abuse
Google constantly penalizes parasites. The parasites ranking today may not rank tomorrow. So unless you are constantly building new ones you may get traffic today you may not next month.

This big fight against google and us the folks becomes harder and harder....please stay strong dude! So then the only parasites we can use today are: Facebook, Linkedin...... (ranking your article with them in the serps.)