How to improve your generated ChatGPT content in 10 seconds?

[NeedMyLink]

I've been analyzing content generation with AI for the last 6 months, made different kinds of research and got some helpful insights.

I'll start with something easy to understand and to do.

The biggest problem of AI content is that it looks exactly like AI-generated. People keep on telling the chatgpt to make a content more human-like, but it still fails. Using this little tip we made our content to be more "human-like" and better for 30-40%.

Step 1. Generate part by part, heading by heading. It's essential because the ChatGPT has its own tokens, and it just can't generate the whole article of high quality with a single prompt. Just can NOT. So do it part by part.

Step 2. After each part generated - don't just go to another one. Read it carefully and if you totally don't like it - give the chat a simple additional prompt, some kind of: "The quality of the content is not what I expected to see. Re-write this part, make it more human like".

You can change this kind of prompt, but the key point is that the rewritten part can be better. It may be more interested to read and understand, and not look like typical AI-content. If you do this for 10 texts - you will see at least 3-4 texts to be better than the original part (they will have less % of AI detection with different tools, and more % of unique with plagiarism checkers)


Have you tried so?

 

[IM Dude]

Most people don't read 100% articles. They skim scan read about 10-20% max. So don't worry about if looks ai as long as it ranks. Add bullet points, bold phrases, directly answer what they want. Also if all top 10 are ai who the hell cares. Think about how you can scale and make it your priority. Also use chatgpt+ don't use the free one.

 

[jeronimon]

Thanks, will be trying. But wont it take too long tho

 

[NeedMyLink]

Most people don't read 100% articles. They skim scan read about 10-20% max. So don't worry about if looks ai as long as it ranks. Add bullet points, bold phrases, directly answer what they want. Also if all top 10 are ai who the hell cares. Think about how you can scale and make it your priority. Also use chatgpt+ don't use the free one.

Surely it has to be ChatGPT 4 model. But, content written on GPT is fine as long as it is written good. Mostly, people are not able to do good content. They think it's enough to give keywords and topic. Common problem

 

[tNK]

I've been analyzing content generation with AI for the last 6 months, made different kinds of research and got some helpful insights.

I'll start with something easy to understand and to do.

The biggest problem of AI content is that it looks exactly like AI-generated. People keep on telling the chatgpt to make a content more human-like, but it still fails. Using this little tip we made our content to be more "human-like" and better for 30-40%.

Step 1. Generate part by part, heading by heading. It's essential because the ChatGPT has its own tokens, and it just can't generate the whole article of high quality with a single prompt. Just can NOT. So do it part by part.

Step 2. After each part generated - don't just go to another one. Read it carefully and if you totally don't like it - give the chat a simple additional prompt, some kind of: "The quality of the content is not what I expected to see. Re-write this part, make it more human like".

You can change this kind of prompt, but the key point is that the rewritten part can be better. It may be more interested to read and understand, and not look like typical AI-content. If you do this for 10 texts - you will see at least 3-4 texts to be better than the original part (they will have less % of AI detection with different tools, and more % of unique with plagiarism checkers)
View attachment 307564

Have you tried so?

What website is this?

 

[NeedMyLink]

What website is this?

mine

 

[iproxyonline]

Interesting point about "generating part by part" thanks!

In response, I want to share my experience, as I've been using ChatGPT 4 daily for the past few months. Its algorithm is based on a probabilistic statistical approach. This means it follows each word with the one most likely to be used next in a similar context from its vast training text database. So, your main task is to provide as much context as possible.
For example, I might ask it to write an email subject "considering recommendations from leading global email marketing experts; to maximize the email open rate; for a specific topic for a particular audience from a specific company."

 

[NeedMyLink]

Interesting point about "generating part by part" thanks!

In response, I want to share my experience, as I've been using ChatGPT 4 daily for the past few months. Its algorithm is based on a probabilistic statistical approach. This means it follows each word with the one most likely to be used next in a similar context from its vast training text database. So, your main task is to provide as much context as possible.
For example, I might ask it to write an email subject "considering recommendations from leading global email marketing experts; to maximize the email open rate; for a specific topic for a particular audience from a specific company."

It also works, but the content still may stay the "AI visible" with the common AI patterns

 

[MoonStarz]

Is a really good idea to test, but just a few wil try it, the idea of the AI is to automate and for some people read, check and asked to rewrite takes time for them, but if someone focus on quality definitely will be helpful and is going to pay off at the end.

 

[NeedMyLink]

Is a really good idea to test, but just a few wil try it, the idea of the AI is to automate and for some people read, check and asked to rewrite takes time for them, but if someone focus on quality definitely will be helpful and is going to pay off at the end.

Exactly, but 30 seconds to rewrite is not that much and worth trying at least

 

[pavankumorkumo]

What website is this?

 

[parasol]

I am sorry to barge in so late into the conversation, but most of the people mentioned that only GPT4 should be used. I don't have (for time being) an option to subscribe to GPT4. Will it be such a detriment to use 3.5?

 

[robe50203]

according to my experience, we need to be guided properly with chatGPT prompts, what to do, what content we want, what keywords we focus on.....and how many characters we want.

 

[Jaco Kristoffer]

Will try to do that

 

[Boeing787]

Generating part by part definitely gives a better output.

You also have to give good instructions

 

[entervpn]

Utilize AIPRM for ChatGPT. It features prebuilt templates, making it incredibly easy to produce the best content. This tool is available as a Chrome extension.