Do you use Classic or Gutenberg?

[Black Belt Spodermen]

I personally use the Classic if the content only includes images or text and also because it's way faster to use.

Gutenberg on the other hand does have many advantages for presenting your article in a better way. However, I don't like how messy it becomes sometimes.

 

[Dopious]

I was a Classic fanboy into the last, but I´ve more and more getting to love Gutenberg. Fck all other pagebuilders.

 

[Jave]

Gutenberg with some additional blocks/templates through Ghostkit

 

[IM Dude]

Gutenberg all the way. No reason to use ood version of something.
Recently I am creating a semi auto ai blog. Importer is creating classic editor posts. Adding external links in classic editor is nightmare. Die already.
Maybe there is a plugin to force delete or disable classic editor.

 

[SirLouen]

When I use another builder like Elementor I prefer to stick to Classic, because generally I use classic for CPT or templated content so the builder will be in charge of formating such piece.
But when I don't use a builder, I simply like Gutenberg with some extra blocks like Generateblocks.

 

[BlogPro]

Gutenberg all the way.

Allows me to define a new code block for microdata and easily insert schema in-post.

Gutenberg all the way. No reason to use ood version of something.
Recently I am creating a semi auto ai blog. Importer is creating classic editor posts. Adding external links in classic editor is nightmare. Die already.
Maybe there is a plugin to force delete or disable classic editor.

Can you give me more info on the process you're undertaking. Maybe I can help?

 

[roydan]

Gutenberg because it's:

1. Easier to use for a noob like me, while being stupidly flexible.
2. I'm not sure why, but I associate the classic editor with Times New Roman.
3. Saying Gutenberg is oddly fun.
Gutenberg...
Gutenberg..
See?

 

[provocative]

I was still a classic fan quite recently. But I saw that Gutenberg is clearly better, so my new sites are stay on that.

 

[Black Belt Spodermen]

So, it's time to stick to Gutenberg for all of my sites. I should adapt to this format if that's what the majority of bloggers are doing.

 

[IM Dude]

Gutenberg all the way.

Allows me to define a new code block for microdata and easily insert schema in-post.



Can you give me more info on the process you're undertaking. Maybe I can help?

Thanks, I will send you my whole semi auto blogging process on dm tomorrow. I don't want to give it out here.

 

[BlogPro]

Thanks, I will send you my whole semi auto blogging process on dm tomorrow. I don't want to give it out here.

Of course, happy to help in anyway.

 

[nick76]

At the beginning (years ago) I hated Gutenberg, especially because if I copy and paste from files that I had prepared before I couldn't easily separate them into paragraphs: then I imagine that they also improved something because in subsequent blogs I never had this type of problem. The classic system might seem more versatile but honestly, there is nothing I haven't been able to do with Gutenberg.

 

[Beklink]

Gutenberg, i just hate the classic one

 

[Roger Marquez]

Gutenberg​

 

[antho_rob]

Gutenberg

 

[Hontione]

I always go with Gutenberg.

 

[cyoz2019]

Gutenberg these days, esp with the various addon blocks. Effectively same as element or now.

 

[HeavyMorning]

Gutenberg, anyday.

 

[rankvisible]

I currently using Gutenberg as I am familiar with it now.

 

[raitoxxxx]

Classic only.