Hostinger hosting ( 48 months ) 210 USD or A2hosting ( 36 months ) 251 USD

Hi guys happy sunday,

not laugh I found this yesterday: hostingdude.com
a weird design of website from the 90's, and it looks like a godaddy copy, you pay for all: backups, ssl and more.....
 
I am going to buy hosting for my company, which one do you reccomend? Shared hosting from Hostinger and A2 hosting.
A2 hosting turbo boost ( 36months ) = 251 USD
View attachment 229668

and Hostinger Business Shared Hosting ( 48months ) = 210 USD
View attachment 229669
Thank you very much !


According to the web search results, some of the main differences are:

  • Price: Hostinger is cheaper than A2 Hosting, especially for longer-term contracts. For example, Hostinger’s Premium shared hosting plan costs $2.79 per month for a 48-month contract, while A2 Hosting’s Drive shared hosting plan costs $5.99 per month for a 36-month contract.
  • Features: A2 Hosting offers more features than Hostinger, such as unlimited storage space, free site migration, automatic backups, and Turbo servers for faster performance. However, Hostinger also includes some useful features, such as a free domain name, a custom control panel, and a website builder.
  • Performance: Both Hostinger and A2 Hosting have good performance and uptime, but A2 Hosting has a slight edge with its optimized environment and speed-enhancing tools. However, Hostinger also has a global network of data centers and uses SSD storage and Cloudflare CDN.
  • Support: Both Hostinger and A2 Hosting offer 24/7 support via live chat, phone, email, and ticket system. However, A2 Hosting has a more responsive and knowledgeable support team, while Hostinger’s support can be slow and inconsistent.
Based on these differences, you should choose Hostinger if you want a cheaper and simpler web hosting service with decent features and performance. You should choose A2 Hosting if you want a more feature-rich and faster web hosting service with better support.

I hope this helps you make an informed decision.
 
I have no idea about a2 but hostinger is pretty much standard. Would go with namecheap.
NameCheap is not good. I've used them. Slow and lots of downtime.

1696191688970.png
 
digital ocean cloudways is the best imo. this is me running heavy 15 PHP workers in the background.
I've got it under 115ms LCP which is mad. google recommends <1.2s.

very cheap as well. wouldn't recommend either one OP, which isn't what you asked for.

View attachment 230384
This one? https://www.cloudways.com
It is very expensive and has a limited bandwith.
 
This one? https://www.cloudways.com
It is very expensive and has a limited bandwith.
Cloudways is a lot better than any other hosting I'm using with from the last 3+ years and had no issues so far, even though I'm hosting 10 good traffic sites in a my account. It costs me $30/mo which is around $3/mo per site. Use this coupon TST20 to get 20% off for the first 3 months.
 
Yep each individual has different webhosting experiences, hello today guys !

namecheap when you not have more than 10-12.000 visitors is not so bad their middle plan ($98/ year or something...)
Best Webhost I ever had= mddhosting $15/month really fast webhost and excellent live chat support !

For my second domain ( I try use two separate domains with same name to rank multiple times...) = Hostxnow fo 4,50 british pounds/monthly a really fast webhost and they have fast reacting email support.

For germany ionos is not so bad and you can pay monthly.
Stay absolute away from that gofuckdaddy cult.......
Nexcess is another really good and fast webhosting but more expensive.

NC, mddhositng and Hostxnow they hold on their words you not get big discount on first sight, after that a big 3x times price rising rip off- I like that.

I have heard the Hostinger webhost has a good and easy AI to build your website ? I miss it , ok I use free pro elementor (legal no hack) and envato, so I have enough blocks and templates, the free Hestia theme is good and shows category page description in nice way, but not has grid layout for blog, but I can live with that you see most big newspaper media sites not have grid layout.
 
Back
Top