Ok, I read something like this in the marketplace some days ago and I was in the doubt of why now someone has decided are going to play this new game of corrupting a new SEO word
It happened with PBN (now there is almost a full marketplace section on fake-PBN and everyone is accepting such, when they are only selling fricking Guest Posts)
And now it happens that a parasite will become any site that simply accepts casinos, Viagra and any gray/black niche.
Let's be clear here: this is still a PR or a GP that simply accepts more niches. But still, PR and GP site not a parasite.
Parasiting is a technique, and the parasite page is the place to execute such technique. It doesn't matter the niche, although gray/black niches use more frequently this technique for their churn & burn nature (many are going to receive a massive penalty and die young, so better live fast & furiouly)
But technically, you can parasite with the whitest product on the market. So not every site that accepts gray niches is a parasite by definition
Furthermore, parasiting involves hideous practices, specially non-consent practices. Many sites in the world, like Reddit or Change.org were historically the first parasiting objectives. To the point that they have now implemented a no-follow no-index strategy to eliminate these practices (only once the Subreddit, the campaign or the post, or the user, demonstrates a degree of trustworthiness they remove the nofollow/noindex tags). Still, you can inject articles and content without owner supervision. This is the main core of parasiting.
Still, you can clearly execute parasiting practices over a PR or a GP, but they are not parasites by definition (for example, blasting the site). But technically, you can blast not only a parasite, but a 2.0, or low-quality links like bookmarks, profiles, etc, so still I doubt that the blast-eable option make a PR or a GP, a parasite-page category.
Moreover, I would not even call it 100% parasiting because they have had 100% consent, and one of the main parasiting properties is the non-consent.
I think that
@710fla got the point here on this post:
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/m...es-that-rank-using-oppenheimer-movie.1522439/
Conclusion: The title should have been: "New big PR sites to publish gray/black niches articles".
Why I'm talking about this?
I think we should stop corrupting words; otherwise we are going to end with those fricking 50 marketplace posts full of deceipt to the point that when someone is actually asking for a parasiting job, he will not really know what he is asking about (like now happens with PBN)