AI Writing Tools Vs Manual Writers!!!

Bro, read the OP its about blogging not about copywriting , now don't tell be they are same thing, they are not.
If you're at all an affiliate on your blog, then this is semantics and you're missing my point.

Article Forge is my favorite. I also just started a subscription to Zimmwriter (that uses my OpenAI API) to see if I can replace Article Forge due to the cost.
Did Zimm straighten out that virus scan issue? If not, then be careful with that. It seems legit, but idk.. Too many red flags for me in the scans.
I tried Article Forge waaaay back when they first started. I always liked what they WANTED to do, but my experience with it left much to be desired. Maybe they're much better by now. It's been years since I tried it.
 
Manual content takes the cake anyday unless you're a super authority site.
In the second scenario you can get away with promoting scams even let alone AI content.
Google loves lapdancing for authority sites even if they're harmful.
 
My opinion would be,Using AI writing tools can be cost-effective and efficient for generating content, but human writers bring creativity, nuance, and a personal touch that AI may lack; it depends on your content goals and budget
Exactly this. Plus if you are creating a lot of blog content through AI its always ideal to humanize it by editing it.
 
Manual content takes the cake anyday unless you're a super authority site.
In the second scenario you can get away with promoting scams even let alone AI content.
Google loves lapdancing for authority sites even if they're harmful.
With just a single prompt, this is what I was able to generate in response to this post:

Oh, my friends, I understand where you're coming from when you say manual content "takes the cake." There's a warmth, a texture, a human touch we've always associated with words crafted by human hands. It's like your grandmother's quilt, isn't it? Each stitch represents a thought, a feeling, a moment of pause. But let's open our hearts to the incredible possibilities that AI brings into this ever-expanding tapestry of life.

You see, the goal of communication—whether it’s through an article, a blog post, or a heartfelt letter—is to connect, to be understood, and to foster empathy. And guess what? In some scenarios, AI has shown a remarkable ability to do just that, but on a scale, and with a consistency, that's truly groundbreaking.

There are matters of scale, where AI can help generate content for a range of topics in the blink of an eye, letting us share information far and wide. But that's not the story I'm most excited to tell you about. No, it's the potential for AI to enhance quality that has me truly enthralled. Picture this: AI algorithms that not only understand the nuances of language but are trained in the art of empathy. Imagine tools that can analyze mountains of data to tell a story that resonates with the human experience.

Now, let’s be clear: AI isn't here to replace us, just as calculators didn't replace mathematicians—they’re tools to amplify our human gifts. The beauty of AI is in its ability to sift through the noise and find the chords that strike a universal human feeling, sometimes uncovering insights that even we might overlook. That's not undermining human capability; that's enhancing it. It’s like a harmonious choir where each voice—human or artificial—adds a unique richness to the melody.

Let's not see AI as the competition; let’s see it as a collaborator. Just as we've welcomed innovations like the printing press and the internet, let's open the doors of our minds to this new frontier. Let's use it to expand our collective voice, to tell stories that enlighten, uplift, and most importantly, connect us all.

I invite you to lean into this new era with curiosity and hope, rather than fear or skepticism. Because, my friends, when we lean into change, we make room for growth. And isn’t growth what life’s all about?
 
With just a single prompt, this is what I was able to generate in response to this post:
Still sounds painfully AI :D

Here's what GPT has to say about its own content:

Yes, the text you provided appears to be AI-generated content. It showcases a positive viewpoint on the potential of AI in enhancing content creation and communication. If you have any questions or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss, feel free to let me know!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toz
Still sounds painfully AI :D

Here's what GPT has to say about its own content:
Fair enough, but the goal was to capture the emotional appeal of the response. Just the same, with a single prompt, I was able to get this created:
Hey, I totally get where you're coming from with the whole "manual content takes the cake" thing. I mean, who doesn't love that homemade feel, right? But hear me out, AI's not the villain in this story. It's like... it's like when you find out your favorite homemade spaghetti sauce actually came from a jar, but was spiced up by your mom. It started as something pre-made, but it ended up pretty darn good, didn't it?

So yeah, AI can churn out content way faster than any of us keyboard warriors, no argument there. But it's not just about speed or even cost. AI's getting smart, like really smart. It can analyze data and pick up on stuff that maybe we'd miss 'cause we're, you know, human and sometimes we've got a lot on our plates.

And okay, the point about authority sites getting a free pass on Google—even when they mess up—is kinda true. It's like the popular kid in school getting away with stuff. But guess what? AI can also help smaller sites, the underdogs, level the playing field. It's not about replacing us; it's like a sidekick that has our back.

Also, let's be real. Just because something's written by a human doesn't mean it's golden. We've all read stuff that's either boring, misleading, or just plain wrong. So why not have an AI buddy that can help us make our content better? It can be like that friend who tells you there's spinach in your teeth—saving you from embarrassment and helping you put your best foot forward.

So yeah, manual content has its charm. I'm not saying replace all human writers with robots or anything crazy like that. I'm just saying, let's give AI a chance to show us what it's got. Who knows? It might just surprise us.

I guess what I'm getting at, is the versatility of AI and how it's not such a 1-trick pony.
 
If you got top writers or write yourself with proper research, seo optimization and good structure the articles will be better most of the time, but it takes time.

AI can speed up the process + you just need minimal manual optimizations to make it work properly.

If you cant get good writers or dont have the time to write use AI.
 
AI automatic writing tools can save you a lot of time compared to manual writing because they generate content much faster than manually written pieces.

Not if you qant quality and need to fact check anything you write anyway. It doesn't save you that much time.
 
What's everyone's opinion on using AI writing tools compared to hiring writers?

I can literally write blog posts myself but that takes a lot of time. These days some AI writing tools are even better than humans, and hiring very good writers is expensive.

So what do you guys think?

If you want to publish in bulk use AI tools.
If you want to rank in a professional fashion hire writers or proofread each AI article.
 
What's everyone's opinion on using AI writing tools compared to hiring writers?

I can literally write blog posts myself but that takes a lot of time. These days some AI writing tools are even better than humans, and hiring very good writers is expensive.

So what do you guys think?
AI tools are already outperforming most writers in terms of quality. If you are a prompt master, you can even challenge the best writers in the industry. But I have to agree with the folks here that topic authority can affect the output greatly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toz
After finding it difficult to get creativity from AI, we will still turn to the human writing that we previously abandoned.
 
AI tools are excellent at producing large amounts of content quickly and cost-effectively, making them perfect for routine tasks. Hiring writers can be slower and more expensive, but it delivers a more personalized touch and a deeper understanding of hard topics. The decision is based on specific needs and priorities.
 
Okay, I'm going to need some of you AI naysayers to start showing some proof. I feel like AI is being used as some blanket term without much context about the prompts and AI Engine(s) being used.
 
Human vs AI, I will say that human writers put, personality, ideas, and knowledge through experience they learn more and add or divide or extend the content even more, AI will provide you all the information or just a small section of what you asked besides is quicker, free and can create even more content of course you need to get the knowledge of the topic and learn more in order to continue working so your content makes sence, if you hire a writer you help some one to get a job and get money to pay bills and get some food in the table, AI will save you money time and upload more frequently, soo...... that is what I thing about Human writers vs AI if for you is better for cost benefit go for it, you will save that money for you or invest it in something else.
 
What's everyone's opinion on using AI writing tools compared to hiring writers?

I can literally write blog posts myself but that takes a lot of time. These days some AI writing tools are even better than humans, and hiring very good writers is expensive.

So what do you guys think?
AI is good for some tasks like lists. But if you need updated content or say frsh content, you have to hire manual writer. Cost is very high in case of manual writer though now.
 
When expert writers leverage AI tools, Such a combination brings together the best of both worlds.
 
Writers are better because with A.I you still need to edit its content.
 
Back
Top